gre考試寫作水平如何更快提升

陳鈴1147 分享 時(shí)間:

gre考試是很多學(xué)子的難題,那么如何考好gre寫作考試?今天小編給大家?guī)韌re考試寫作水平如何更快提升,希望能夠幫助到大家,下面小編就和大家分享,來欣賞一下吧。

gre考試寫作水平如何更快提升

gre寫作考試提分方法一:大量閱讀

閱讀文章

考生必須了解語言的真實(shí)性和優(yōu)美性,通過理解示范文本的語言內(nèi)容和邏輯,學(xué)習(xí)如何在寫作中使用詞匯和句型。在閱讀中,你有機(jī)會(huì)將語言與其內(nèi)容和思維方式聯(lián)系起來。范文范文范文中的一個(gè)詞、短語或句型,因?yàn)樵谔囟ǖ恼Z言環(huán)境中,你可以感受到它的確切內(nèi)涵、外延和用法通過不斷地積累這些好單詞和句子的用法,你寫單詞和提煉句子的能力將穩(wěn)步提高。因此,對(duì)于考生來說,不背課文范本,該怎么用呢?從宏觀上看,要從示范文本即論證體系上細(xì)化文章的結(jié)構(gòu)和邏輯層次。從微觀的角度,我們應(yīng)該從模型文本中提取語言點(diǎn)(單詞、短語、句型)。

閱讀歷史、哲學(xué)、政治等相關(guān)書籍,為GRE寫作儲(chǔ)存必要的知識(shí)。

gre考試寫作有其獨(dú)特的魅力,因?yàn)樗婕暗酱罅康恼軐W(xué)觀點(diǎn)、宗教、政治、藝術(shù)、社會(huì)問題、歷史現(xiàn)象,要求考生有合理的洞察力分析和論證,如何做到有洞察力,必須對(duì)哲學(xué)觀點(diǎn)有一定的了解,這樣你就可以自然地進(jìn)行徹底的分析和論證。這是非常有說服力的,同時(shí)也為知識(shí)儲(chǔ)備中的相關(guān)課題鋪平了道路。gre寫作能力,gre備考要多久否則,就不可能開始,無話可說。例如,在gre的問題部分,有一個(gè)真正的主題:“儀式和儀式有助于定義一種文化。沒有他們,社會(huì)或群體的自我意識(shí)就會(huì)減弱,“儀式和儀式有助于建立一種文化,否則,人們對(duì)社會(huì)或群體的歸屬感就會(huì)減弱。如何理解儀式?西方社會(huì)對(duì)人有什么影響?為什么儀式和歸屬感有什么關(guān)系?如果我們不了解宗教,我們會(huì)感到無助。

GRE寫作,對(duì)論題寫作有很高的要求,所以儲(chǔ)存你的名人故事,積累相關(guān)知識(shí)是非常重要的。在漫長的歷史中,大量的例子是你最有說服力的例子。這個(gè)鏈接也是GRE考生最麻煩的部分,不能舉例支持自己的觀點(diǎn),所以就讓自己發(fā)短信吧。張似乎只有蒼白的論據(jù),缺乏說服力。因此,要讀更多的歷史,積累更多的例子,就要關(guān)注那些重要的哲學(xué)家、科學(xué)家、藝術(shù)家、政治領(lǐng)袖和商界領(lǐng)袖的生平事跡和主要貢獻(xiàn)。例如,本期雜志的主題是:“真正有深度的思想家和富有創(chuàng)造力的藝術(shù)家總是與他們的時(shí)代和社會(huì)格格不入?!闭嬲杏绊懥Φ乃枷爰液透挥袆?chuàng)造力的藝術(shù)家總是與他們的時(shí)代和社會(huì)節(jié)奏格格不入。如果你在這個(gè)話題上沒有必要的思想家和藝術(shù)家的例子,文章難免缺乏說服力。因此,閱讀歷史,積累寫作材料,特別是論據(jù)材料,是GRE作文獲得高分的重要環(huán)節(jié)。

GRE寫作改進(jìn)方法二:研究練習(xí)庫、大綱寫作、練習(xí)

論點(diǎn)部分有242個(gè)問題。首先,我們應(yīng)該熟悉每個(gè)主題,因?yàn)橹黝}是從242個(gè)主題中隨機(jī)抽取的。對(duì)于每一個(gè)論題,我們都可以找出主要的邏輯錯(cuò)誤,即論題的大綱。同時(shí),我們?yōu)槊總€(gè)邏輯錯(cuò)誤準(zhǔn)備一組語言例程。這本書的論證部分詳細(xì)分析了每一個(gè)邏輯錯(cuò)誤。它還提供了詳細(xì)的攻擊框架和優(yōu)美的論證語言。寫出242個(gè)主題的大綱。寫10-15篇完整的文章(如果你的語言能力較弱,你可以增加寫作量)。找搭檔幫你改正錯(cuò)誤,以后再重寫。

Issue部分練習(xí)題一共243個(gè)題目,寫提綱對(duì)于這一部分的備考是至關(guān)重要的,也是最占用時(shí)間、最核心的一個(gè)環(huán)節(jié),gre寫作能力,gre備考要多久每一個(gè)題目的提綱力求詳細(xì),不用去寫開頭段和結(jié)尾段,就寫正文各段你的各個(gè)分支觀點(diǎn),也就是正文部分的論證過程,除了論證以外,寫完后想想可以用些什么論據(jù),把支持論證的論據(jù)也寫上。這里,再次強(qiáng)調(diào)的是,一定要較為詳細(xì)的寫Issue提綱,否則,在考場(chǎng)如果遇到?jīng)]有思考過的題目,很容易亂了陣腳,臨場(chǎng)去想,導(dǎo)致失敗。此外,題目必須考前按題材分類去寫提綱,看懂,知道對(duì)立面和大致寫作思路,往往論據(jù)在同類的很多題目中通用;寫完提綱后,再寫20-40篇完整的文章(語言能力弱的話,盡量多寫)。

GRE作文范文:獨(dú)立思考

What most human beings really want to attain is not knowledge, but certainty. Gaining real knowledge requires taking risks and keeping the mind open―but most people prefer to be reassured rather than to learn the complex and often unsettling truth about anything.

2018年GRE作文范文參考:

What does most human beings want is not discovery and change but reassurance.Although discoveries and changes are the real impetuses of human civilization, most people prefer reassurance than innovations and changes in that in this world most people are conservative and the discoveries and changes would sometimes harm some ones' benefit, which based on the obsolete systems.

On the one hand, in fact, most people value what they have obtained much more than what would be gain through new ways. This conservative kind of thinking in some sense is very common indeed since trying new ways always means taking risks of losing the present benefit. Take many Chinese workers for example. In China now,during the transformation of economy system, many factories and companies are under the danger of bankruptcy due to their rigid ways of thinking. And the workers in these companies or factories do not have positive attitudes neither. They ignore, or we can say give up, the better chance such as leave the old companies and find a new one which would be more suitable or quite for a short time to study some new skills; but stay where they are to wait for reassurance from the companies or government. the reason for this kind of behaviors is that they are fear for losing the jobs, whish however have little points after all. Simply put, they think they can survive if they keep the salary, but maybe lose everything when taking risks. Actually, these people fail to see the wealth behind changes and discoveries. No pain, no gain. One reluctantly loses something, he/she would not gain more important and valuable.

On the other hand, discoveries and changes would bring new systems and value and moral standards, which would necessarily break the outdated ones. In this sense,discoveries and changes could harm some ones or some classes' benefit. Therefore, it is not difficult to understand the resistance against new things and the preference of reassurance to the obsolete system. The Industry Revolution is just a case in point.

The significant change had brought human beings into a new stage of both material and spirit; but during the revolution, many people hold the point of view that the change is very dangerous to human civilization. Such individuals included peasants,old noble men and some government officials. The fundamental reason for this situation was that such a profound and overall change shook the old social and economy system and thus those depended on such a system felt they were threatened.

For example, the peasants lost their lands and the old noble men lost their taxes from the peasants; even the government officials, were in the fear of losing their positions.Thereby, for the men who would still receive benefit from the obsolete system, they would prefer reassurance than changes and discoveries.

It is true that sometimes changes and discoveries would bring some damage to the present society; yet they would automatically build a new one full of vigor and creativity. So people should not be restrained with the conservative ideas and open their minds to see the future benefit they would gain from the new system built by changes and discoveries. Anyway, new things are always prior to the old ones.

GRE作文范文:新創(chuàng)意

Truly innovative ideas do not arise from groups of people, but from individuals.When groups try to be creative, the members force each other to compromise and, as a result, creative ideas tend to be weakened and made more conventional. Most original ideas arise from individuals working alone.

2018年GRE作文范文參考:

I agree with the speaker on that truly innovative ideas arise from individuals.Nevertheless, it is unfair to claim unilaterally that the groups tend to weaken creative ideas without thinking of their positive effects on the ideas; it is equally important for groups to examine, modify, or even reject the ideas.

First of all, truly innovative ideas are destined to arise from individuals in that inter-personal thinking process is so far impossible. This is to say, when we sit still and have a cluster of phenomena, theories, statistics and so forth of a certain issue in our mind, we are thinking it over yet with no assistance at all. After all it is impossible for one to intrude into other's mind. Following this principle, innovative ideas spark off during the process of meditation, and they are the produced by one's own effort. It is equally possible, however, for people to be inspired by each other, yet this is by no means assistance in thinking. Clues, hints, inspirations are to remind people of things ignored or taken for granted, but have nothing to do with the process of thinking, that is, to sort out the whole vision and draw conclusion. In one word, innovative ideas arise from meditation, which is solely limited within one body, one brain. Therefore innovative ideas are always the product of individual's work.

Nevertheless, it does not suggest that innovative ideas then have nothing to do with group work, and actually it is just the opposite. When a novel thought is brought up, it is of great importance to fully evaluate its validity, feasibility, and consequences if carried out. This point need no further illustration if we think of a father who resolutely stops his 6-year-old son from playing matches. The kid might have intended to try something new, driven by an innovative idea, yet the whole house might have caught fire also since the boy is incapable of dealing with accidents. This is the same case in academic fields. In a chemistry lab for example, a novel route design of synthesizing a new compound is never carried out without further evaluation. Practical conditions such as equipments, reagents, and economic efficiency, namely yield per cost, are always taken into consideration and sometimes restrict the application of those ideas.

This is to say, innovation is usually good but not always practicable. This claim is fully demonstrated in the political field. Governors of all levels must take holistic views of the situation and make balanced decision in order to avoid mistakes; innovative ideas alone cannot justify their practicability and goodwill to others. For instance, when we look back, the development of plastic industry has resulted in great loss in the global ecosystem. Thus we see the disastrous consequences of carrying out such innovative yet premature ideas.

Hence, it is necessary for the groups to assess, remedy, and conclude the value and use of innovative ideas. All innovative ideas should be brought to discussions. With the clash of skeptical attitude of others to the advocating behavior of the thinker, fallacies made in a haste can be easily found and eliminated, which rectifies, sometimes supplements the idea. I don't agree with the speaker on his/her judgment of group work as compromising, weakening and conventionalizing innovation. Group work promotes those justified and useful innovative ideas and rejects those invalid, sometimes dangerous ones, as we see the case between father and son, in a chemistry lab, in all nations around the world. Only after the group censorship can the innovative ideas be carried out and benefit people, and this is the time when its innovativeness is fully appreciated.

In conclusion, I concede that most original ideas arise from individuals, yet I believe the group effort on these ideas should never be downplayed. It is the group that judge,reject or develop these ideas; this process is equally important with the innovative thinking.

GRE作文范文:成功

Success, whether academic or professional, involves an ability to survive in a new environment and, eventually, to change it.

2018年GRE作文范文參考:

Many wonder the intrinsic impact of industrial revolution over the last century. Is it a blessing or a curse? Ever since the invention of steam engine, mass production enabled factories to make out products in a madly efficient manner, while machines also supplanted innumerous traditionally skilled artisan, forcing them out of work. Gone are the days when they boasted of their craftsmanship that they assumed to be able support their family all their life. Consumers became more aspiring to novel design instead of durability as goods were made to be discarded.

Hundreds years later, with the first installation of integrated circuit on the chip, another profound turnover took place. Now the computer pervades our life so much that one may find himself half illiterate in absence of input skill. This time, thousands of jobs were created in Silicon Valley, transforming some of the few into billionaire over one night. Nevertheless, the original inventor might not expect that the ensuing slow down and thus recession in IT sector would approach so soon in less than 10 years, which is obviously less than a presumable 15 years time normal for a periodical change.Positive or negative, one mark that characterizes the technological bombardment indicates a constant fact: changes exist ubiquitously and operating at an ever-increasing tempo; those who fail to catch up with the torrent of change would ineluctably engulfed by billows, floating no where and eventually dissolve as negligible bubbles.

Favors as well as opportunities goes to who adapt to the contemporary trend. Fully recognizing this axiom, long before the scientists announced accomplishment of sketches of human genes or earlier successful cloning of Doris, candidates preparing for university admission have smelt the sense. Today, in the U.S., biology and its branch disciplines become the first choice for top students of senior high, determining that this subject, foretold as the third wave in technology, could bring them brilliant future as “Bill Gates” dreamt the same in the previous wave.

In addition to academic realm, respect would be paid to people who though deprived of their past secure professions, choose not to be a loser in the whimsical society. Like the artisans who lost jobs, a vast number of skilled laborer in China’s city of Wengzhou have undergone darkness and depression in those old days. However, after years of endeavor and refinement, they prove their value again. By accurately posit the economic trend and market demand, they play an active role in almost all economic sectors, garments, catering and lodging, hi-tech industry, you name it.

While ability honed in surviving the fickleness of the world makes the path through success shorter, it is essential for the more ambitious to acquire the pith of reformist and lead the trend. In this way, it could help him distinguish from the mediocracy and platitude. This is absolutely not an easy task. Inborn insight and foresight are needed to tell uncommon out of the commonplace; extraordinary perseverance and encouragement is a must to face the coming challenges against his iconoclasm. Very few people crowned with triumph possess this quality, whether the Nobel Prize winner or those who makes coverage on the Times.

In sum, as shown in the course of history, success, whether academic or professional,involves an ability to surviving in a new environment and---, eventually, ---to change it.Now some elite persons have again forecast that another social change is impending.Are you ready for that?


gre考試寫作水平如何更快提升相關(guān)文章:

詳解GRE考試寫作提綱的使用

349067