GRE寫作打字失誤扣分原因分析
GRE寫作是最能體現(xiàn)考生英語水平的題目，因?yàn)槭遣粌H考驗(yàn)著考生的語言功底，還要求這考生的思維以及邏輯能力，但是考生卻常常會(huì)犯些低級(jí)的錯(cuò)誤，比如打字錯(cuò)誤，下面小編就和大家分享GRE寫作字失誤扣分原因分析，來欣賞一下吧。
GRE寫作字失誤扣分原因分析
GRE寫作打字問題扣分情況介紹
根據(jù)GRE考試中作文部分的評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，因?yàn)槲恼轮谐霈F(xiàn)的打字和語法等錯(cuò)誤，最多可能會(huì)導(dǎo)致0.5-1分的扣分。雖然看似分值很少，但由于GRE作文是按照滿分6分計(jì)算，因此哪怕是0.5分也非常重要。因此，在GRE作文中，考生應(yīng)努力避免因?yàn)榇蜃皱e(cuò)誤而導(dǎo)致的扣分，這樣才能在寫作部分拿到更好的成績(jī)。
GRE寫作為何會(huì)出現(xiàn)打字扣分?
想要避免在寫作中出現(xiàn)打字錯(cuò)誤，首先要找到錯(cuò)誤原因并加以區(qū)分，看看是什么導(dǎo)致的打字出現(xiàn)問題，并根據(jù)錯(cuò)誤原因采取針對(duì)性措施避免錯(cuò)誤。一般來說打字錯(cuò)誤的原因主要分為以下三種：
1. 強(qiáng)行提升打字速度導(dǎo)致TYPO
因?yàn)镚RE考試為機(jī)考，而且考試時(shí)間相當(dāng)緊張，一些平時(shí)電腦用得比較少的考生可能因?yàn)椴涣?xí)慣鍵盤輸入，再加上擔(dān)心考試時(shí)間不夠而給自己心理上帶來了一些額外壓力，強(qiáng)迫自己加快打字速度，這樣就有可能造成打字錯(cuò)誤。
避免方法：針對(duì)這種原因造成的打字問題，小編建議大家，特別是那些鍵盤用得比較少的同學(xué)，能夠在平時(shí)備考過程中就提前使用電腦先適應(yīng)起來，進(jìn)行限時(shí)的寫作練習(xí)時(shí)就可以通過電腦打字進(jìn)行，只要熟悉了用法，一般就不太會(huì)因?yàn)榇蜃痔於霈F(xiàn)打字錯(cuò)誤了。
2. 對(duì)寫作詞匯拼寫掌握不熟練
GRE考試的詞匯量雖然沒有明確要求，但其實(shí)數(shù)量還是不少的。有些同學(xué)在背單詞的時(shí)候，可能只是記住了它的長(zhǎng)相和基本含義，對(duì)于詞匯的拼寫和具體用法則沒有太過留意，剛好混了個(gè)臉熟。而到了寫作中，想要使用這些單詞的時(shí)候往往就會(huì)因?yàn)闆]有徹底掌握而出現(xiàn)各種拼寫和用法上的問題。
避免方法：如果考生是因?yàn)檫@個(gè)原因而產(chǎn)生了打字錯(cuò)誤，那么就需要把詞匯基礎(chǔ)再好好鞏固一下，特別是對(duì)于那些其實(shí)沒有徹底掌握到位的單詞，應(yīng)該進(jìn)一步加強(qiáng)記憶，以避免出現(xiàn)拼寫和使用上的錯(cuò)誤。
3. 手腦不協(xié)調(diào)手速跟不上思路
有些考生在寫文章時(shí)會(huì)因?yàn)樗悸分袛酂o以為繼而痛苦不堪，但也有考生會(huì)出現(xiàn)思路太順反而手速跟不上這樣幸福的煩惱。相信大家在寫作中可能也偶爾進(jìn)入過文思如泉涌的狀態(tài)，腦子里的想法一個(gè)接一個(gè)，感覺下筆順暢無比。但這種時(shí)候，打字速度反而會(huì)跟不上，有些考生為了抓住這種狀態(tài)而拼命加速，結(jié)果反而因?yàn)椴划?dāng)心把一些單詞給拼錯(cuò)造成了扣分。
避免方法：如果大家是因?yàn)檫@種原因犯錯(cuò)，小編的建議是先寫再說，但寫完一定要回頭檢查一下。打字錯(cuò)誤一般來說只要通過返回檢查，很容易就能被找出來。所以只要能保證檢查一遍，那么就不太會(huì)再出現(xiàn)這種問題了。
GRE作文范文：新創(chuàng)意
Truly innovative ideas do not arise from groups of people, but from individuals.When groups try to be creative, the members force each other to compromise and, as a result, creative ideas tend to be weakened and made more conventional. Most original ideas arise from individuals working alone.
GRE作文范文參考：
I agree with the speaker on that truly innovative ideas arise from individuals.Nevertheless, it is unfair to claim unilaterally that the groups tend to weaken creative ideas without thinking of their positive effects on the ideas; it is equally important for groups to examine, modify, or even reject the ideas.
First of all, truly innovative ideas are destined to arise from individuals in that inter-personal thinking process is so far impossible. This is to say, when we sit still and have a cluster of phenomena, theories, statistics and so forth of a certain issue in our mind, we are thinking it over yet with no assistance at all. After all it is impossible for one to intrude into other's mind. Following this principle, innovative ideas spark off during the process of meditation, and they are the produced by one's own effort. It is equally possible, however, for people to be inspired by each other, yet this is by no means assistance in thinking. Clues, hints, inspirations are to remind people of things ignored or taken for granted, but have nothing to do with the process of thinking, that is, to sort out the whole vision and draw conclusion. In one word, innovative ideas arise from meditation, which is solely limited within one body, one brain. Therefore innovative ideas are always the product of individual's work.
Nevertheless, it does not suggest that innovative ideas then have nothing to do with group work, and actually it is just the opposite. When a novel thought is brought up, it is of great importance to fully evaluate its validity, feasibility, and consequences if carried out. This point need no further illustration if we think of a father who resolutely stops his 6-year-old son from playing matches. The kid might have intended to try something new, driven by an innovative idea, yet the whole house might have caught fire also since the boy is incapable of dealing with accidents. This is the same case in academic fields. In a chemistry lab for example, a novel route design of synthesizing a new compound is never carried out without further evaluation. Practical conditions such as equipments, reagents, and economic efficiency, namely yield per cost, are always taken into consideration and sometimes restrict the application of those ideas.
This is to say, innovation is usually good but not always practicable. This claim is fully demonstrated in the political field. Governors of all levels must take holistic views of the situation and make balanced decision in order to avoid mistakes; innovative ideas alone cannot justify their practicability and goodwill to others. For instance, when we look back, the development of plastic industry has resulted in great loss in the global ecosystem. Thus we see the disastrous consequences of carrying out such innovative yet premature ideas.
Hence, it is necessary for the groups to assess, remedy, and conclude the value and use of innovative ideas. All innovative ideas should be brought to discussions. With the clash of skeptical attitude of others to the advocating behavior of the thinker, fallacies made in a haste can be easily found and eliminated, which rectifies, sometimes supplements the idea. I don't agree with the speaker on his/her judgment of group work as compromising, weakening and conventionalizing innovation. Group work promotes those justified and useful innovative ideas and rejects those invalid, sometimes dangerous ones, as we see the case between father and son, in a chemistry lab, in all nations around the world. Only after the group censorship can the innovative ideas be carried out and benefit people, and this is the time when its innovativeness is fully appreciated.
In conclusion, I concede that most original ideas arise from individuals, yet I believe the group effort on these ideas should never be downplayed. It is the group that judge,reject or develop these ideas; this process is equally important with the innovative thinking.
GRE作文范文：獨(dú)立思考
What most human beings really want to attain is not knowledge, but certainty. Gaining real knowledge requires taking risks and keeping the mind open―but most people prefer to be reassured rather than to learn the complex and often unsettling truth about anything.
GRE作文范文參考：
What does most human beings want is not discovery and change but reassurance.Although discoveries and changes are the real impetuses of human civilization, most people prefer reassurance than innovations and changes in that in this world most people are conservative and the discoveries and changes would sometimes harm some ones' benefit, which based on the obsolete systems.
On the one hand, in fact, most people value what they have obtained much more than what would be gain through new ways. This conservative kind of thinking in some sense is very common indeed since trying new ways always means taking risks of losing the present benefit. Take many Chinese workers for example. In China now,during the transformation of economy system, many factories and companies are under the danger of bankruptcy due to their rigid ways of thinking. And the workers in these companies or factories do not have positive attitudes neither. They ignore, or we can say give up, the better chance such as leave the old companies and find a new one which would be more suitable or quite for a short time to study some new skills; but stay where they are to wait for reassurance from the companies or government. the reason for this kind of behaviors is that they are fear for losing the jobs, whish however have little points after all. Simply put, they think they can survive if they keep the salary, but maybe lose everything when taking risks. Actually, these people fail to see the wealth behind changes and discoveries. No pain, no gain. One reluctantly loses something, he/she would not gain more important and valuable.
On the other hand, discoveries and changes would bring new systems and value and moral standards, which would necessarily break the outdated ones. In this sense,discoveries and changes could harm some ones or some classes' benefit. Therefore, it is not difficult to understand the resistance against new things and the preference of reassurance to the obsolete system. The Industry Revolution is just a case in point.
The significant change had brought human beings into a new stage of both material and spirit; but during the revolution, many people hold the point of view that the change is very dangerous to human civilization. Such individuals included peasants,old noble men and some government officials. The fundamental reason for this situation was that such a profound and overall change shook the old social and economy system and thus those depended on such a system felt they were threatened.
For example, the peasants lost their lands and the old noble men lost their taxes from the peasants; even the government officials, were in the fear of losing their positions.Thereby, for the men who would still receive benefit from the obsolete system, they would prefer reassurance than changes and discoveries.
It is true that sometimes changes and discoveries would bring some damage to the present society; yet they would automatically build a new one full of vigor and creativity. So people should not be restrained with the conservative ideas and open their minds to see the future benefit they would gain from the new system built by changes and discoveries. Anyway, new things are always prior to the old ones.
GRE寫作相關(guān)文章：