GRE閱讀邏輯題型思維能力訓練技巧講解

GRE閱讀邏輯題型思維能力訓練技巧講解 ,靈活思路才能提升正確率得分,快來一起學習吧，下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。

GRE閱讀邏輯題型思維能力訓練技巧講解 靈活思路才能提升正確率得分.

GRE邏輯閱讀考試中有多少題?

首先，小編要為大家介紹一下GRE邏輯閱讀的具體題型數(shù)量。在GRE每個語文VERBAL部分SECTION中，總計20道題目里有一半屬于閱讀題，常見形式是一篇長閱讀附帶3-4道題目，然后3篇左右的短閱讀，每篇附帶1-2題。而在這3篇短閱讀中，必然會有至少一篇的邏輯閱讀題。另外長閱讀中的部分題目也可能以邏輯題的形式出現(xiàn)。因此邏輯題看似數(shù)量較少，但其實在閱讀中的占分比例并不低。

GRE邏輯閱讀重在考察思維能力

有人可能會提出疑問，GRE邏輯CR為什么要考批判性思維能力呢?所謂批判性思維能力，簡單來說就是挑錯找漏洞的能力?？糋RE的考生，大多是為了申請研究生以上級別專業(yè)項目的深造。而到了這個級別的學術研究，往往需要大家自行查找和閱讀大量書籍文章，收集各類信息。面對龐大復雜的各類專業(yè)內容，假如考生缺乏分析質疑發(fā)現(xiàn)漏洞的能力， 對所有渠道來源的資料都照收不誤，那么可能很快就會受到一些錯誤或者片面內容的影響，對于學術內容產生錯誤的認識和偏見，這對于大家提升學術能力是非常不利的。而批判性思維能力，能夠幫助大家從各式消息中排除錯誤內容，篩選出真正有價值的可靠知識，從而讓自己的學業(yè)深造得到提升。因此，考生是否具備足夠應對處理大量學術知識的批判性思維能力，就成為了GRE考試考察的一大重點，這也正是GRE邏輯閱讀體現(xiàn)其價值的地方。

GRE邏輯閱讀思維方法訓練技巧分享

那么考生應該如何訓練出足以應對GRE邏輯閱讀的批判思維能力呢?

大家首先需要明確的一點是，批判思維能力并不是某種特定的解題方法和技巧，而是更進一步的思維方式層面上的能力。這也就意味著考生僅靠大量做題的題海戰(zhàn)術是不夠的，因為做題只能提升你對解題方式的熟練度，于解題思維并無太大助益。真正有效的方式是通過日常的思維訓練來進行加強。簡單來說，就是帶著批判質疑的觀點來看待問題。以廣告為例，日常生活中廣告無處不在，這些廣告大多都是打的感情牌，本身的邏輯往往存在不少漏洞。大家可以嘗試著去用批判思維來看待這些廣告，自己去尋找發(fā)現(xiàn)這些邏輯漏洞，對于其中的一些賣點如何加強、削弱等等。通過這種方式來提升自己的批判思維。多開動腦筋，把GRE邏輯閱讀解題中的各種思路和方法都運用到生活中，不用多久你的批判思維能力就會得到顯著提升，面對GRE邏輯閱讀也會更加游刃有余。

多讀課外讀物也能鍛煉邏輯思維

通過閱讀來提升能力對于整個GRE語文VERBAL部分的考試來說都是通用的，而具體到不同題型則還是會有所區(qū)別。假如大家想要提升邏輯閱讀的批判思維，那么就應該拓展課外閱讀量，特別是要增加爭議性文章內容的閱讀。比如一些經濟類政治類話題的公開討論，雙方發(fā)表的不同觀點等，往往都有較大爭議，互相辯駁相持不下。通過閱讀涉及到這些內容的文章，考生也能夠學習到不少邏輯思維方面的技巧，如何發(fā)現(xiàn)對立觀點的邏輯漏洞，怎樣加強己方觀點的說服力，這些都有助于大家鍛煉自己的批判思維能力。

邏輯思維有助GRE作文提分

眾所周知，批判思維重點在于發(fā)現(xiàn)邏輯漏洞。而在GRE兩篇作文中，Argument作文也是類似于對給出題材和觀點進行辯駁攻擊的駁論文。許多考生寫不好Argument作文，正是因為缺乏批判思維，無法找到找準題目中最主要關鍵的各類邏輯漏洞。假如大家能夠練好批判思維，那么在Argument作文的寫作中，也能夠更快發(fā)現(xiàn)問題，更為順利地寫好文章。練好批判思維，GRE作文同樣受益匪淺。

總而言之，考生如果想要確保GRE邏輯閱讀題的得分，那么訓練好批判思維就必不可少了。小編希望上文提到的這些訓練方法技巧，能夠給大家?guī)硪恍﹨⒖?，幫助大家在備考中做好更為充分的準備，以順利應對GRE邏輯閱讀的挑戰(zhàn)。

攻破新GRE邏輯閱讀

Question 13 is based on the following reading passage.

In the past ten years, there have been several improvements in mountain-climbing equipment. These improvements have made the sport both safer and more enjoyable for experienced climbers. Despite these improvements, however, the rate of mountainclimbing injuries has doubled in the past ten years.

13. Which of the following, if true, best reconciles the apparent discrepancy presented in the passage?

(A) Many climbers, lulled into a false sense of security, use the new equipment to attempt climbing feats of which they are not capable.

(B) Some mountain-climbing injuries are caused by unforeseeable weather conditions.

(C) Mountain climbing, although a dangerous sport, does not normally result in injury to the experienced climber.

(D) In the past ten years there have been improvements in mountain-climbing techniques as well as in mountain-climbing equipment.

(E) Although the rate of mountain-climbing injuries has increased, the rate of mountain-climbing deaths has not changed.

Explanation

In this question you are asked to identify the fact that would best reconcile the apparent discrepancy that the passage presents. The discrepancy is that despite improvements in mountain climbing equipment that have made climbing safer, the incidence of mountain-climbing injuries has greatly increased. Choice A explains how this could have happened — the improvements in equipment have led climbers to attempt feats that are beyond their level of skill. Therefore, Choice A is the correct answer.

None of the other choices provides information that resolves the discrepancy. Neither Choice B nor Choice C relates to conditions that have changed over the relevant ten-year period. Choices D and E do relate to the relevant period. But if, as Choice D says, techniques as well as equipment have improved, that fact by itself only makes the increase in injuries more puzzling. Choice E provides more data about the consequences of climbing accidents, but doesn’t suggest any explanation for the increase in injuries.

攻破新GRE邏輯閱讀

At a certain period in Earth’s history, its atmosphere contained almost no oxygen, although plants were producing vast quantities of oxygen. As a way of reconciling these two facts, scientists have hypothesized that nearly all of the oxygen being produced was taken up by iron on Earth’s surface. Clearly, however, this explanation is inadequate. New studies show that the amount of iron on Earth’s surface was not sufficient to absorb anywhere near as much oxygen as was being produced. Therefore, something in addition to the iron on Earth’s surface must have absorbed much of the oxygen produced by plant life.

4. In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is a claim made by the argument in support of a certain position; the second is that position.

(B) The first is a judgment made by the argument about a certain explanation; the second is that explanation.

(C) The first expresses the argument’s dismissal of an objection to the position it seeks to establish; the second is that position.

(D) The first sums up the argument’s position with regard to a certain hypothesis; the second provides grounds for that position.

(E) The first is a concession by the argument that its initial formulation of the position it seeks to establish requires modification; the second presents that position in a modified form.

Explanation

The passage presents an argument and the question asks you to identify the role the portions highlighted in boldface play in that argument. The first step in responding is to read through the passage quickly to get an understanding of what is being said. Then it is possible to go back and assess how the parts of the passage fit together into an argument.

In this passage the first sentence presents two pieces of information that seem to be in conflict — the atmosphere contained almost no oxygen even though plants were producing so much of it. The second sentence presents a hypothetical explanation that has been proposed for reconciling the discrepancy — that oxygen was absorbed by iron. The next sentence calls this hypothetical explanation inadequate and the following sentence gives a reason for that judgment — that there was insufficient iron for the proposed explanation to work. Finally, the last sentence draws the conclusion that there must have been something in addition to iron to absorb the oxygen.

Since the highlighted portions in the passage represent the main content of the third and fourth sentences, the task in this question is to find the answer choice whose two parts fit those sentences’ roles. It can be seen that answer Choice D fits the requirement: the third sentence does sum up the argument’s position about a hypothesis, and the fourth sentence gives grounds for the third. Therefore Choice D is the correct answer.

攻破新GRE邏輯閱讀

During the day in Lake Constance, the zooplankton D. hyalina departs for the depths where food is scarce and the water cold. D. galeata remains near the warm surface where food is abundant. Even though D. galeata grows and reproduces much faster, its population is often outnumbered by D. hyalina.

Which of the following, if true, would help resolve the apparent paradox presented above?

(A) The number of species of zooplankton living at the bottom of the lake is twice that of species living at the surface.

(B) Predators of zooplankton, such as whitefish and perch, live and feed near the surface of the lake during the day.

(C) In order to make the most of scarce food resources, D. hyalina matures more slowly than D. galeata.

(D) D. galeata clusters under vegetation during the hottest part of the day to avoid the Sun’s rays.

(E) D. galeata produces twice as many offspring per individual in any given period of time as does D. hyalina.

Description

The paragraph presents an apparent paradox: the zooplankton that spends the day in less hospitable conditions often outnumbers the one that stays in more hospitable conditions.

Explanation

The presence of predators of zooplankton feeding near the surface during the day would suggest that D. galeata is consumed at a higher rate than D. hyalina: this would explain why D. hyalina is often more numerous, so Choice B is correct. Choices C and E are incorrect because although they help to explain why the two zooplankton reproduce at different rates, they do not help to resolve the apparent paradox. Choices A and D are incorrect because nothing is said in the paragraph to show the relevance of the presence of other species of zooplankton, nor of the habit of clustering under vegetation, to the relative population size of the two species.

攻破新GRE邏輯閱讀

A study found that 70 percent of children surveyed in 1970 had at one time had cavities, whereas only 50 percent of those surveyed in 1985 had ever had cavities. The researchers concluded that the level of dental disease in children had declined between 1970 and 1985.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine the researchers' conclusion presented above?

(A) Cavities are the most common kind of dental disease to which children are subject.

(B) The children surveyed came from a broad variety of income backgrounds.

(C) The children surveyed were selected from among students of teachers cooperating with the researchers.

(D) The accuracy of cavity detection techniques has improved dramatically since 1970.

(E) The children surveyed in 1985 were younger on average than those surveyed in 1970.