GRE閱讀3大常見丟分原因分析
淺析GRE閱讀3大丟分原因 ,不學(xué)應(yīng)對方法高分難保，我們來看看吧，下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。
GRE閱讀3大常見丟分原因分析
那么，GRE閱讀究竟有哪些常見的丟分原因需要大家引起警惕呢?
1. 文章篇幅太長不會定位
GRE閱讀文章篇幅不一，大致可分為短篇文章和長篇文章，其中大部分閱讀包括邏輯閱讀的文章都是短篇，一次GRE考試中長篇文章的數(shù)量一般只有1篇。但恰恰是這1篇的長篇閱讀，才是最讓考生頭痛的內(nèi)容。這是因?yàn)殚L篇文章往往涉及到一些比較專業(yè)晦澀的科技類社會類內(nèi)容，文章中存在大量長難句式和冷僻生詞，本身具備一定難度，通篇閱讀往往需要大量時(shí)間。同時(shí)文章中往往會涉及到許多細(xì)節(jié)內(nèi)容，題目中也會有涉及到這些細(xì)節(jié)的部分，定位就成為了大問題。想要看的細(xì)節(jié)找不到在哪里，只能重讀一遍，大大浪費(fèi)了考試時(shí)間。
應(yīng)對長篇文章，最好的辦法還是快速閱讀+做筆記的方法。長篇文章不需要全部完整地詳細(xì)閱讀，在快速閱讀過程中，大家應(yīng)該以理解文章整體大意和各段落的重心思想為主。對于各類細(xì)節(jié)內(nèi)容，只要在筆記上進(jìn)行標(biāo)記，知道其所處位置即可。等到解答相應(yīng)的細(xì)節(jié)題時(shí)，再根據(jù)標(biāo)記快速返回，就能準(zhǔn)確定位到具體內(nèi)容，提升解題效率。
2. 題目出現(xiàn)復(fù)雜數(shù)字干擾思路
在GRE閱讀題中，為了證明作者觀點(diǎn)，文章中常會使用到一些具體的數(shù)字，有些數(shù)字十分復(fù)雜，涉及許多具體內(nèi)容。而這些數(shù)字加入出現(xiàn)在題目當(dāng)中，就會提升題目難度，特別是在一些Support或者Infer題目中，選項(xiàng)中的數(shù)字可以說是扣分的主要原因。
想要應(yīng)對好復(fù)雜數(shù)字問題，考生首先需要培養(yǎng)閱讀過程中對于數(shù)字的敏感性。只要在文章中看到，建議大家都第一時(shí)間做好標(biāo)記，以便之后返回查找。同時(shí)，如果在題目選項(xiàng)中看到出現(xiàn)了數(shù)字問題，首先要區(qū)分是否是有關(guān)內(nèi)容。很多選項(xiàng)提到了一堆數(shù)字，本身卻和題目毫無關(guān)系，只是干擾項(xiàng)，大家一定要學(xué)會分辨并及時(shí)排除。同時(shí)，面對數(shù)字題時(shí)如果實(shí)在沒有頭緒，可以通過排除法來解題，重點(diǎn)還是在理解題目本身。
3. 細(xì)節(jié)題解題效率太低
細(xì)節(jié)題是套路題型，但有時(shí)候也會出現(xiàn)變化。很多考生解答細(xì)節(jié)題時(shí)，往往會按照返回原文查找，然后根據(jù)原文內(nèi)容進(jìn)行解題。但很多時(shí)候，原文中會出現(xiàn)許多其實(shí)并沒有作用的干擾性細(xì)節(jié)，大家不能簡單地按照原文提到就是對，沒提到就是錯的思路來解題。正確做法是先看懂題目，然后把涉及到的細(xì)節(jié)進(jìn)行分類排除，只保留真正有關(guān)的細(xì)節(jié)，如此一來就能順利應(yīng)對好細(xì)節(jié)題中的那些隱藏陷阱和扣分點(diǎn)。
綜上所述，GRE閱讀難度還是相對較高的，考生只靠固定解題思路并不能確保拿下高分。小編希望上文中提到的這些容易導(dǎo)致丟分的問題，大家能夠提前通過備考找到應(yīng)對和解決的方法，如此才能在考試中盡可能多地保證得分沖刺高分。
GRE考試閱讀專欄邏輯題及答案整理
Columnist: Until very recently, Presorbin and Veltrex, two medications used to block excess stomach acid, were both available only with a prescription written by a doctor. In an advertisement for Presorbin, its makers argue that Presorbin is superior on the grounds that doctors have written 200 million prescriptions for Presorbin, as compared to 100 million for Veltrex. It can be argued that the number of prescriptions written is never a worthwhile criterion for comparing the merits of medicines, but that the advertisement’s argument is absurd is quite adequately revealed by observing that Presorbin was available as a prescription medicine years before Veltrex was.
1. In the columnist’s argument, the two highlighted portions play which of the following roles?
A. The first is a claim that the columnist’s argument seeks to clarify; the second states a conclusion drawn about one possible interpretation of that claim.
B. The first identifies the conclusion of an argument that the columnist’s argument is directed against; the second states the main conclusion of the columnist’s argument.
C. The first states the main conclusion of the columnist’s argument; the second states a conclusion that the columnist draws in defending that conclusion against an objection.
D. The first identifies an assumption made in an argument that the columnist's argument is directed against; the second states the main conclusion of the columnist’s argument.
E. The first is a claim that has been offered as evidence to support a position that the columnist opposes; the second states the main conclusion of the columnist’s argument.
答案：B
GRE考試閱讀專欄邏輯題及答案整理
Stylistic evidence and laboratory evidence strongly support the claim that the magnificent painting Garden of Eden is a work of the Flemish master van Eyck. Nevertheless, the painting must have been the work of someone else, as anyone with a little historical and zoological knowledge can tell merely by looking at the painting. The animals in the painting are all vivid representations of actual animals, including armadillos. Yet armadillos are native only to Americas, and van Eyck died decades before Europeans reached the Americas.
2. In the argument given, the two highlighted portions play which of the following roles?
A. The first is a position that the argument seeks to reject, the second is evidence that the argument uses against that position.
B. The first and the second are each pieces of evidence that have been used to support the position that the argument opposes.
C. The first presents the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides evidence in support of that conclusion.
D. The first is a judgment that serves as the basis for the main conclusion of the argument; the second states that main conclusion.
E. The first is an intermediate conclusion drawn in order to support a further conclusion stated in the argument; the second provides evidence in support of that intermediate conclusion.
答案：C
GRE考試閱讀專欄邏輯題及答案整理
New methods developed in genetic research have led taxonomists to revise their views on the evolutionary relationships between many species. Traditionally the relatedness of species has been ascertained by a close comparison of their anatomy. The new methods infer the closeness of any two species’ relationship to each other directly from similarities between the species’ genetic codes.
3. Which of the following conclusions is best supported by the information?
A. The apparent degree of relatedness of some species, as determined by anatomical criteria, is not borne out by their degree of genetic similarity.
B. When they know the differences between two species’ genetic codes, taxonomists can infer what the observable anatomical differences between those species must be.
C. The degree to which individuals of the same species are anatomically similar is determined more by their genetic codes than by such environmental factors as food supply.
D. The traditional anatomical methods by which taxonomists investigated the relatedness of species are incapable of any further refinement.
E. Without the use of genetic methods, taxonomists would never be able to obtain any accurate information about species’ degrees of relatedness to one another.
答案：A
GRE閱讀3大常見丟分原因分析相關(guān)文章：
上一篇：2016GRE閱讀真題解析
