如何讓自己的GRE作文角度和視野更高

如何讓自己的GRE作文角度和視野更高?我們一起來看看吧，下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。

如何讓自己的GRE作文角度和視野更高?

對于issue, 將抽象具體化，通過抓住關(guān)鍵詞進行展開分析論證，結(jié)構(gòu)基本上是平行的幾段，而最近見過的一些作文，覺得除了這種寫法外，自己寫的角度和視野可以更高些，對題目采取折中的態(tài)度，正反各說一通，最后綜合說一下，比如提建議的，就說說有沒有更好的建議，比如因果類的，可能有些原因本身有問題，卻讓我們?nèi)フ撟C這個原因是否能導致某種結(jié)果，我們正反說一下后可以談談自己對這種理由的認識，諸如此類，學會這樣去分析題目，寫作文，我覺得肯定給人一定有深度的感覺。

關(guān)于語言，我覺得首先最基本的要求就是寫對句子，一句話要表達正確表達清晰，閱卷人才有興趣看下去。比如時態(tài)，比如短語使用，比如動詞和介詞的搭配，比如單詞拼寫，比如單詞的準確使用而不是牽強附會(不能為了使用一個高級單詞而不擇手段)。其次就是我們的詞匯使用的變換，同一個單詞，可能所有人都會用，但用得恰到好處就很難了，同一個意思，可能大多數(shù)人都會向某個單詞，這個時候我們可不可以換個別的單詞(也不能是太偏僻的單詞)。再就是表達方式的變換，主動語態(tài)和被動語態(tài)的靈活使用，我們當然很反感每句話開頭都是I怎么的怎么的，還有倒裝句、虛擬語氣以及獨立主格結(jié)構(gòu)等，這些句式的使用必將使文章增色不少，我們的句子會變長，而不是簡單講狀語疊加和謂語并列。

關(guān)于結(jié)構(gòu)上，大部分作文的開頭是first，second，third等等序數(shù)詞或者連接詞。其實我們學過更多的，多儲備些，適當?shù)仂`活使用是很好的。

在準備的前期，當然不必要苛求自己在規(guī)定的時間內(nèi)完成一篇作文，每個句子自己都可以好好琢磨下，像上面提到的，或許我們不習慣，但堅持訓練十來天，相信會習慣的，實在不習慣就可以自己在寫作文之前做些句子翻譯練習，漢譯英，然后跟人家好的翻譯對照，練習一些天，也會好很多的。

語言關(guān)過了，之后的作文練習就會好很多了，就是學會思維發(fā)散和邏輯，總之就是能說出話，我想每個題目我們都應該熟悉，遇到了能說個一二三來，想不出來的查相關(guān)話題的素材，與人交流，堅決弄明白，而不要閉門造車。

最后再次建議寫作文一定要修改，最好給別人修改，實在沒人自己也要反復讀反復醞釀，修改單詞拼寫錯誤語法錯誤，變換句式，查找思維漏洞。

GRE寫作優(yōu)秀實例：現(xiàn)代攝像機和印刷術(shù)

題目：

"The video camera provides such an accurate and convincing record of contemporary life that it has become a more important form of documentation than written records."

攝像機可以通過如此精確而有力的記錄手段來再現(xiàn)當代生活，因此它已經(jīng)代替書面記錄成為了一種更重要的記錄手段。

正文：

"The video camera provides such an accurate and convincing record of contemporary life that it has become a more important form of documentation than written records."There have been many methods of documenting in the history of human, from carved ancient pottery to sheepskin documents, of which the video camera may be the newest form with certain superiorities and inferiorities to written records. The advantages of video camera certainly make it an important form of documentation, but not to the extent of being more essential than written records due to its disadvantages.

To begin with, video can be interpreted as a series of pictures associated along the time, while written records can be considered as the descriptions of these pictures.Therefore, it is undoubtedly that video contains much more information than that of written records. From a video, we can clearly know what happened with subtle details.Merely with a television set, we can easily watch the happenings at home, such as the Olympic Games, comfortably sitting on the sofa, needless to be present on the spot.

And more excitedly, certain close-up enables us to scrutinize our favorable athletes. If there isn't video camera, we may be unable to enjoy such activities unless we can afford time and expense to be on the spot. While it is true that we can also be acquainted with the circumstances through newspaper or other media, however, the written record may be unable to present them as accurate as video. The imagination from the reports, however detailed, dooms to be imaginary, by all means different from the real circumstance, which video can represent. Moreover, the written records may contain some mistakes due to the carelessness or injustice of its reporters, while the video may be more accurate and convincing.

Another strongpoint of video is that it can be perceived simply by visual signals, from which people mainly get information in their daily lives, and therefore this method is more natural than written records. Everyone, ranging from a babbling child to an old grandpa, is able to get some information from the video just as they do during their daily lives, regardless of their literate ability. While the written record, no matter how easily it is represented, requires literacy of its readers, and a newspaper or book means nothing to an illiterate person. In addition, video is much easier to comprehend for people all over the world. For instance, an American can grasp nothing about a story written in Chinese unless s/he has learnt such a foreign language. However, s/he can absolutely understand something about a video recorded in China, although s/he may be confused with the language spoken in the video.

While video is certainly not superior to written recorders in all aspects, its limitations determine that the written record will not be replaced at least at present. The first disadvantage of video is that it is much more inconvenient and expensive. Video must be recorded on the spot, namely, when an event happens to you, you cannot record it unless you have a camera at hand. However, even though you haven’t paper and pencil either, you are still able to recall it to record based on your remembrance.

Therefore, for those who can't afford a handy camera or who are unwilling to bring it anytime anywhere, the written records may be the easiest form available. Further, another weakness of video is that its cost is too high and its correspondingly high-quality record may be beyond people's requirement. The cost of making a written report is much less than that of manipulating a video. Also, every morning we may browse a newspaper to know what happened throughout the world, and the simple report, which may only consume us a few seconds, meets our needs of curiosity; we needn't the accuracy and vividness of video, which may be more time-consuming.

It is fortunate for us to own video as a supplementary kind of documentation. With a video camera, we can record important events in our lives, such as the weeding or birthday party. However, it is impossible to record everything happening around us, yet we can record them in our diaries. In a word, both the video camera and the written records are irreplaceable forms of documentation, and their supplementation serves better than any one of the documentation method alone.

GRE issue寫作優(yōu)秀實例：知識和經(jīng)驗的引進

題目：

"No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study."

在任何一個研究領(lǐng)域當中，除非有該領(lǐng)域之外的人引進他們的知識和經(jīng)驗，否則該領(lǐng)域就很難獲得巨大的發(fā)展。

正文：

Nowadays quite lot fields of studies develop quickly due to the juxtaposition. Perhaps the produce of some significant advances in those fields attributes to the outsiders.However, this does not mean that outsider’s knowledge and experience is the necessary condition for the prosperity of a subject study as the author asserts.

Admittedly, borrowing knowledge and experience from other fields of study has indeed triggered significant breakthrough in many subjects. Quite a few scientific subjects like biochemistry, economics, astronomy, are undoubtedly the hybrids of subjects originally thought far distant from one another. Among these subjects, the changing of the astronomy is a successful example for applying the small amplifying tubes which used on chemistry to telescope inventing. As we all know, since that Copernicus raised the Copernican system, the astronomy develops slowly because of no useful equipment for seeing the sky. Then, a clever inventor used the amplifying tube which was a device for doing experiments to make out the telescope which was a changing point of the astronomy. Thanks to the cross field studying of that inventor,the progress of astronomy can be advanced so much for that today people have already embark on the moon. So, it is one of the wise ways to borrow the knowledge and experience from other fields when your own study is impeded.

However, though it is wise sometime to learn from other's experience and knowledge,this does not stand that it has necessity to import from outsiders in order to make great progress in one’s own field. On one aspect, juxtaposition in some certain fields is not feasible, for example the physics and math, they are quite difficult to mix with other sciences, because they themselves are completed system which are the basis of quite a lot other fields. For instance, it is Newton himself discover the law of gravity which caused the great development in the process of physics. On the other hand, if the great breakthroughs in all fields of study must rely on the knowledge and experience from outsiders, are there still quite a lot of people donate their whole life in solving a problem. For example, the honored mathematician called "chenjinrun" who donated his whole life in solving the GOLDBACH’S CONJECTURE. However, such a puzzle was unknown till he died. If as the author recommends, Mr. Chen should wait for the materials from other fields. However, there were no useful information from other fields to such a puzzle, only left to do was making effort to research in his field. So bringing from outsiders is not the necessary condition for the breakthrough.

Finally, as the factor contributing to an academic subjects' significant growth, they include many apart from sharing the outsiders’ intelligence, such as the long-term academic accumulation, the appropriate social and economic support, the good-timing birth of geniuses and so on. All these factors can also bring the subject study breakthrough amounts to not only rely on the suggestion as the author asserts. For example, as the America emphasis on all fields study, so the government supplies great number of money on research every year, which gives the people in that field quite a lot confidence. With the result that so many noble prize winner are American establishes that the importance of finance support.

All in all, analyzing the elements to the advance of subject, we should consider many factors rather than only focus on one important element. In my opinion, significant progress in ones field attributes to the mutual function of every related factor. Only bringing from others is wise sometime but not always.

如何讓自己的GRE作文角度和視野更高相關(guān)文章：