新版GREArgument寫作新題庫(kù)
大家知道GRE考試都會(huì)出哪些題目嗎？想要在GRE寫作中拿高分，須知新版GREArgument寫作新題庫(kù)，一起來學(xué)習(xí)一下吧，下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。
新版GREArgument寫作新題庫(kù)
題目：
The following appeared in a memorandum written by the chairperson of the West Egg Town Council.
"Two years ago, consultants predicted that West Egg's landfill, which is used for garbage disposal, would be completely filled within five years. During the past two years, however, the town's residents have been recycling twice as much material as they did in previous years. Next month the amount of recycled material—which includes paper, plastic, and metal—should further increase, since charges for pickup of other household garbage will double. Furthermore, over 90 percent of the respondents to a recent survey said that they would do more recycling in the future. Because of our town's strong commitment to recycling, the available space in our landfill should last for considerably longer than predicted."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
中文翻譯：
兩年前，我們的顧問預(yù)言West Egg用于投放垃圾的填埋地將在五年內(nèi)完全充滿。然而在過去兩年間，市對(duì)于鋁和紙張的循環(huán)再生的數(shù)量比以前翻了一番。由于垃圾收集的收費(fèi)在下個(gè)月將會(huì)加倍，循環(huán)再生的材料數(shù)量將進(jìn)一步增加。而且，最近一次調(diào)查超過90%的回應(yīng)者表示他們將會(huì)在未來做更多的循環(huán)再生工作。由于居對(duì)循環(huán)再生的有力支持，我們填埋地可利用空間的使用時(shí)間將比預(yù)期的長(zhǎng)得多。
寫一篇回應(yīng)，討論還需要何種具體的證據(jù)才能更好的評(píng)估上面的論證，并解釋這個(gè)證據(jù)是如何強(qiáng)化/削弱這篇文章的論證的。
新版GREArgument寫作新題庫(kù)
題目：
The following is a letter to the head of the tourism bureau on the island of Tria.
"Erosion of beach sand along the shores of Tria Island is a serious threat to our island and our tourist industry. In order to stop the erosion, we should charge people for using the beaches. Although this solution may annoy a few tourists in the short term, it will raise money for replenishing the sand. Replenishing the sand, as was done to protect buildings on the nearby island of Batia, will help protect buildings along our shores, thereby reducing these buildings' risk of additional damage from severe storms. And since beaches and buildings in the area will be preserved, Tria's tourist industry will improve over the long term."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
中文翻譯：
T島海岸的E沙灘的侵蝕對(duì)于我們島和我們的旅游業(yè)是個(gè)嚴(yán)重的威脅。為阻止侵蝕，我們應(yīng)該對(duì)使用海灘的人收費(fèi)。盡管這一解決方案會(huì)在短期內(nèi)觸怒少量游客，它將會(huì)減少使用海灘的人數(shù)并增加補(bǔ)充沙子的資金。象臨近的Batia島一樣補(bǔ)充沙子將會(huì)有助于對(duì)我們沿岸建筑的保護(hù)，從而減少這些房屋在大風(fēng)暴中受損的危險(xiǎn)。由于房屋和海灘將會(huì)受到保護(hù)，所以T島地區(qū)的旅游業(yè)將會(huì)在長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)得到發(fā)展。
寫一篇回應(yīng)，討論還需要何種具體的證據(jù)才能更好的評(píng)估上面的論證，并解釋這個(gè)證據(jù)是如何強(qiáng)化/削弱這篇文章的論證的。
新版GREArgument寫作新題庫(kù)
題目：
The following appeared in a health newsletter.
"A ten-year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago, approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets, whereas today that number is nearly 80 percent. Another study, however, suggests that during the same ten-year period, the number of bicycle-related accidents has increased 200 percent. These results demonstrate that bicyclists feel safer because they are wearing helmets, and they take more risks as a result. Thus, to reduce the number of serious injuries from bicycle accidents, the government should concentrate more on educating people about bicycle safety and less on encouraging or requiring bicyclists to wear helmets."
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
中文翻譯：
一項(xiàng)為期十年的對(duì)于在騎自行車時(shí)戴頭盔的作用的研究顯示，10年前，所有騎車人中大約有35%報(bào)告說他們戴頭盔，現(xiàn)在這個(gè)比例接近80%。然而另外一項(xiàng)調(diào)查顯示在相同的十年期間，因騎車引起的事故數(shù)量增加了200%。這些結(jié)果說明騎車人因?yàn)榇髦^盔而感到更安全，因而導(dǎo)致他們面臨更大的危險(xiǎn)。因此，為減少自行車事故中嚴(yán)重傷害的數(shù)量，政府應(yīng)該更多地對(duì)人們加強(qiáng)自行車安全的教育，并提供鼓勵(lì)或要求騎車人戴頭盔的課程。
寫一篇回應(yīng)，在其中檢視文章的論證中述及和/或未明確述及的假設(shè)，務(wù)請(qǐng)解釋文章的論證是如何依賴于這些假設(shè)的，并指出如果這些假設(shè)不成立會(huì)對(duì)文章的論證帶來何種影響。
新版GREArgument寫作新題庫(kù)
題目：
Milk and dairy products are rich in vitamin D and calcium—substances essential for building and maintaining bones. Many people therefore say that a diet rich in dairy products can help prevent osteoporosis, a disease that is linked to both environmental and genetic factors and that causes the bones to weaken significantly with age. But a long-term study of a large number of people found that those who consistently consumed dairy products throughout the years of the study have a higher rate of bone fractures than any other participants in the study. Since bone fractures are symptomatic of osteoporosis, this study result shows that a diet rich in dairy products may actually increase, rather than decrease, the risk of osteoporosis.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
中文翻譯：
牛奶和奶制品富含維生素D和鈣，這是骨骼生長(zhǎng)和維持所必須的物質(zhì)。因此很多人相信多吃奶制品的飲食可以幫助預(yù)防骨質(zhì)疏松癥，這是一種骨骼隨年齡而顯著弱化而且與環(huán)境和基因因素相關(guān)聯(lián)的疾病。但是一項(xiàng)對(duì)大量人群的長(zhǎng)期研究發(fā)現(xiàn)那些在研究期間經(jīng)常食用奶制品的人骨折發(fā)病率比其他參加研究的人要高。由于骨折是骨質(zhì)疏松癥的癥狀之一，這一研究結(jié)果表明富含奶制品的飲食實(shí)際上會(huì)增加而不是減少患骨質(zhì)疏松癥的危險(xiǎn)
寫一篇回應(yīng)，討論還需要何種具體的證據(jù)才能更好的評(píng)估上面的論證，并解釋這個(gè)證據(jù)是如何強(qiáng)化/削弱這篇文章的論證的。
新版GREArgument寫作新題庫(kù)
題目：
A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years. Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood. Moreover, the majority of families in Bay City are two-income families, and a nationwide study has shown that such families eat significantly fewer home-cooked meals than they did a decade ago but at the same time express more concern about healthful eating. Therefore, the new Captain Seafood restaurant that specializes in seafood should be quite popular and profitable.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
中文翻譯：
最近的銷量調(diào)查顯示Bay City餐館的海鮮菜肴的消費(fèi)量比過去五年增加了30%。而現(xiàn)在該市還沒有專門經(jīng)營(yíng)海鮮菜的餐廳。而且，Bay City的大多數(shù)家庭是雙收入家庭，一次國(guó)家調(diào)查顯示這類家庭在家做飯的數(shù)量比十年前顯著減少，同時(shí)他們更關(guān)注健康飲食。因此，在Bay City開設(shè)一家新的專營(yíng)海鮮食品的C餐館將會(huì)非常受歡迎而且有利可圖。
寫一篇回應(yīng)，討論還需要何種具體的證據(jù)才能更好的評(píng)估上面的論證，并解釋這個(gè)證據(jù)是如何強(qiáng)化/削弱這篇文章的論證的。