2020年雅思寫作如何提升
2020年雅思寫作有哪些如何提升?一起來學(xué)習(xí)吧，下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。
2020年雅思寫作有哪些如何提升
一、大小作文均衡比較，小作文決不掉以輕心。
之前誤以為小作文不用練習(xí)，簡單的背誦范文就行。但在上課時，老師提醒我小作文也很重要，而且它提分相對比較容易，可以分擔(dān)一部分大作文的壓力。于是我跟著老師認真、系統(tǒng)地學(xué)習(xí)了小作文的寫作，包括怎樣審題，怎樣根據(jù)寫作目的從給的信息中提煉出重要details，怎樣描寫趨勢怎樣對比等等。這次雅思寫作考到8分，小作文練習(xí)功不可沒。
二、堅持與自信的關(guān)鍵，在于Listen to Your Heart。
這二者總是說起來容易做起來難。經(jīng)過失敗之后，人往往會聽到周圍各種各樣的聲音，有鼓勵但也有質(zhì)疑和嘲諷，自己也會不自覺地對自己的能力開始懷疑。我曾不止一次地想過“算了吧，找個一般的學(xué)校上吧!”然而這樣的念頭不久又都會被我自己打破，因為不管別人怎樣說，我清楚我付出的努力，我了解我過去的成績，我相信這不是我的水平。我的人生道路每一步都應(yīng)該有我踏實的腳印，如果年輕的時候我沒有盡全力去爭取更好的未來，幾年之后我一定會追悔莫及。
雅思考試寫作范文：富國是否該幫助窮國
Task：Rich countries provide financial aid to poor countries but this aid has little effect, therefore rich countries should provide other types of help. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
發(fā)達國家向貧困國家提供財政援助，但這種援助效果甚微，因此富裕國家應(yīng)該提供其他類型的幫助。你在多大程度上同意這一說法?
思路解析：
管自己的好處：
1. 國家的稅收和資源都是基于國內(nèi)大眾，所以國家必須首先對國內(nèi)問題負責(zé)，否則大眾會認為遭到忽略和歧視，他們會推翻政府。
2. 國外問題太多，缺乏監(jiān)管和法律，那些愛心捐款和物資有可能流入國外官僚的腰包，而沒有起到救助國外窮人的初始目的。
3. 我們國內(nèi)社會需要用錢的方面都已經(jīng)太多，錢用自家都不夠，捐助國外只會引起國內(nèi)弱勢群體的憤怒，增加社會犯罪類。
管他人的好處：
1. 很多國外的社會問題都是過去我們國家的某些行動導(dǎo)致的，如戰(zhàn)爭和侵略，所以我們因該對國外的貧窮負責(zé)。
2. 很多國外的問題最終會影響到我們的社會，比如說索馬里海盜對于西方海運的威脅。
3. 很多國際問題是不分國界的，比如說國外的環(huán)境污染和疾病會通過自然渠道流入我們國內(nèi)。
參考范文：
What kind of relief from rich countries should be given priority in terms of supporting developing countries? Some people think the best answer of this issue is simply money. Others, however, hold an opposed view that other practical aids, instead of finance, are a sound decision. Personally, I am in favor of the latter view, and I will explore possible reasons as below.
Firstly, the common root problem of developing countries is the collapsed administration and economy systems, and their recovery seriously depends on the transfusing of external capital. Firstly, financial aids allow a poor country to build up an effective government by paying salaries of governmental personnel without delay. With stable income, most officials would be satisfied and motivated to be fully in charge of social technical, executive and supervisory positions like courts of law, police stations, water and power supply departments and so forth, thus lifting the community out of street violence, crimes and living chaos. Besides, financial injection helps to restore the banking system, which means the availability of commercial loan with low interest for a large amount of companies eagerly needing money for material purchase, hiring workers and products manufacturing. Accordingly, what the capital input brings include vibrant industry and business, ever-increasing job opportunities and tax revenue for public welfare--in short, a booming social development on a right track.
Another reason for supporting financial aids is that money is always a favored kind of donation, because it gives recipients in poor countries a high flexibility to buy what they are really lack of. In fact, practical needs are always variable and unpredictable in different countries, people and times ,so that it is very likely that the common physical goods endowed from rich countries may not precisely suit demands of local regions. For example, as for Vietnam which suffers from wars for decades, surprisingly, any type of food aid from foreign countries is undesirable , for the reason that the yield of grain produced in this poor country can not only fully feed its people, but also be more than enough for food export. In contrast, if Vietnam were offered money directly, it will buy whatever it needs most from international markets, probably from public transportation to vaccines to school facilities. Therefore, straight money support is indispensable, its universal effectiveness is always superior over any other goods-based donation.
However, financial aids do not come without risks, and one of them is about their misuse. Obviously, in too many developing countries lacking democracy, public supervision, or accountability and transparency in government operation, there is a high possibility that the money might be appropriated for personal sake or even flow into the pocket of bureaucrats--corruption in short, expectedly. In addition, the most worrying aspect is that in poor countries in civil war, money will be misspent by warlords buying new weapons and bombs, instead of foodstuffs or medicines. Consequently, In cases above, the final application of financial support would depart from its initial charitable purpose, and it will make social poverty worse, not better.
Moreover, when it comes to healthy and sustainable growth, there are more to require for a poor country than just buying stuffs by money. Specifically, the acquirement of core factors that have lasting and fundamental impacts on the society, such as qualified teachers, doctors, lawyers and scientists, cannot be achieved by buying, but rather by systematic training and teaching. In other words, non-financial aids from developed countries are also necessary. For example, professional teams containing experts in all kinds of fields from science to medication, from law to social work, should be sent in poor countries for the purpose of educating their future talents. What is more, observers from rich countries should also join the running of local government, which ensures that all kinds of benefaction can be allocated to the public fairly.
In conclusion, financial aids are always needed as the first step for economy revival. To a larger extent, however, money is very limited and even risky, and other practical helps, especially the ones associated with human resources, should be introduced into poor countries.
雅思考試寫作范文：政府撥款對象
Task：Some countries achieve international sporting success by providing specialized facilities that are only used to train top athletes ,instead of providing sport facilities that every can use.Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Sample answer：
In some countries,players with athletic talent receive more support, especially in terms of the specialised facilities they used while the demand of the masses in sports is often ignored. From my perspective, the development of elite sport may bring a range of benefits in the short term, but mass sport is more closely related to the well-being of the public in the long run.
In the short term, it seems sensible to invest on speclialised facilities for some excellent sportsmen when considering the positive impacts brought by these top athletes. From the national level, it is these elites that bring honor in some international competitions and then shape a strong image for their own country. On a individual level, the public will be positively influenced by the sportsmanship revealed by these champions, which will contribute to the improvement of the quality of the whole nation.
However, in the long run, when pondering the essential reason why sports exist, we can find out that the prosperity of mass sports is of more significance and therefore more capital should be allocated to construct facilities that everybody can use. The most fundamental function of sports is to assist people to build a strong body, and in some extent, the more sports facilities there are, the more chances there are for people to take part in sports in their daily life. Another deeper reason is that people can develop a host of valuable qualities such as self-control and perseverance in this process, both of which play an key role on people’s way to achieve success.
So, when comparing the advantages of two sides, I believe this development is a short-sighted approach regarding to sports success. The public are the base of a nation. Only when every ordinary person benefits from the sports facilites, will the development of sports industry be more meaningful.
雅思寫作范文：課堂學(xué)到更多知識
Task:Students in school or university learn more from classes of teachers than other resources (eg Internet or TV), do you agree or disagree?
Sample answer：
The updated understanding of study and the cutting-edge technology usher in an era when the students can have a variety of ways to acquire knowledge. Although there are other forms to obtain knowledge and information, I am still the proponent of the belief that students can learn more from their teachers than other resources.
Study, to some degree, is not a one-way input of knowledge, while it is the procedure of mutual interaction between teachers and students. In the conventional teaching and learning mode, the teachers and the students co-exist in an environment where they can have timely interaction. This means teachers can have a more comprehensive and directly understanding of their students’ shortcomings and strong points, which guarantees that students can learn more from the courses that are tailored to their needs.
It is apparent that students can obtain more knowledge from their teachers because teachers do not only function as craftsmen who only impart knowledge but also serves as a supervisor or a guardian. This is especially true in the case where students are less self disciplined and are inclined to go astray without the supervision and guidance of teachers. By comparison, other resources of learning such as Internet and TV sometimes are likely to make the students distracted due to a host of irrelevant information, which will undermine their learning efficiency and make students learn less.
It is also true that students are likely to learn more from other resources. Internet and TV are two media where there are a wealth of knowledge and information ranging from science and humanity. They are also the easily accessible platforms for the students who are in the remote places where the learning resources can hardly challenge the dominant role played by teachers.
To sum up, teachers are still the primary resource from which students gain knowledge, although the influence of other learning resources cannot be underestimated.
2020年雅思寫作如何提升相關(guān)文章：
2020年雅思寫作如何提升
