gre考試寫作失分點(diǎn)有哪些

gre考試中比較拿難分的當(dāng)屬gre寫作考試，今天小編給大家?guī)韌re考試寫作失分點(diǎn)有哪些，希望能夠幫助到大家，下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。

gre考試寫作失分點(diǎn)有哪些?

gre寫作失分點(diǎn)介紹

1。邏輯混亂。

2。過于主觀。

3。中式思維/表達(dá)。

4。過分注重用詞。

大體上來說，同學(xué)們的邏輯問題是最多的。gre考試邏輯問題有三種，通篇邏輯，段落之間，段落之中。

其實(shí)這可能和我們高中初中的英語教育有關(guān)系，大家都很喜歡一條一條擺原因。Firstly，secondly。。。然后后面至于這個(gè)ly后面是什么就不管了，一頓胡扯。也不管這段落與段落之間的銜接是否自然，反正都有什么ly給打頭陣。

事實(shí)上，中西方的思維總是存在差異，很多時(shí)候看管老師們都不懂考生在說什么。考官很困惑，這個(gè)例子和這個(gè)有關(guān)系嗎?為什么前面在說A，后面突然B了? 和結(jié)論什么關(guān)系?要記住一點(diǎn)，文章是一個(gè)整體，你的開篇結(jié)尾和中部內(nèi)容都是應(yīng)該有關(guān)聯(lián)的。也就是說，在開頭提到的，文中應(yīng)該有展開，同時(shí)在結(jié)尾有總結(jié)。中文里不也要求行文流暢么，這至少得要求邏輯是通順的。

很多同學(xué)都很喜歡寫中立觀點(diǎn)“A不錯，但不夠好”，這雖然看起來很客觀，但實(shí)際上對邏輯的要求非常高，要怎樣去組織語言，組織相應(yīng)的論據(jù)論點(diǎn)，非?？简?yàn)人。有同學(xué)想說A事件要瑕疵互見，但是寫著寫著就亂七八糟，東一塊西一塊，不知道在講點(diǎn)什么了。更有厲害的索性冗長的2000來詞，講了個(gè)空話。所以建議剛上手的同學(xué)，還是選擇一邊倒，站定腳跟不放松。即便是真的要寫中立觀點(diǎn)，實(shí)際上也都在A和B之間有所偏好。

此外，現(xiàn)在很多人會要求練writing的時(shí)候先寫提綱。于是同學(xué)們們就只寫一個(gè)觀點(diǎn)，然后后面的例子亂用，或者根本沒有弄清楚什么是例子。事實(shí)上，這種展開，可以是實(shí)例，也可以是虛擬的假設(shè)。實(shí)例中往往分自己的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和他人的經(jīng)驗(yàn)。那么怎樣的例子有說服力呢?一般來說是：名人名事(知名度大)> 眾人眾事(樣本大)>自己經(jīng)歷(體會深)>他人經(jīng)歷。假設(shè)往往不夠有說服力，因?yàn)楹茈y涉及到每一個(gè)變量。但是假設(shè)在有的時(shí)候可以行得通，就是在很難說清楚步驟和因果關(guān)系的時(shí)候，用一個(gè)假設(shè)場景來推導(dǎo)會讓文章變得淺顯易懂。

所以建議，在剛開始上手寫toefl作文的時(shí)候，先不要給自己30分鐘的壓力，先列出提綱(10分鐘)，再用30分鐘去寫，看能寫多少。

記住你的gre寫作考試舉例一定要死死扣住你的觀點(diǎn)，不要是和觀點(diǎn)打擦邊球的。比如我改過之前一個(gè)小朋友的文章，她的大觀點(diǎn)是電腦對學(xué)生來說是有益的，小觀點(diǎn)是，可以查到很多資料，然后例子是可以用google查到很多資料，很快捷。ok，乍一看這個(gè)沒有問題。但是實(shí)際上問題大了，用goole查到很多資料，是因?yàn)殡娔X還是internet?這很容易就偏題了，變成internet對學(xué)生來說是有益的。例子一定要從論點(diǎn)出發(fā)，再回到論點(diǎn)。不要將你的論點(diǎn)發(fā)散，后果很可能就是越寫越跑題。所以每次寫好一篇文章，都看看，論據(jù)里的keywords是不是和論點(diǎn)里的keywords一樣，論點(diǎn)里的keywords又是不是和題目里的keywords一樣。你的keywords可以比大題里的keywords更加narrow，但是千萬不要更加廣泛。

最后說的邏輯錯誤，是段落中邏輯比較容易錯的。一般是對接續(xù)詞的運(yùn)用。如However，thus，therefore，他們決定了上下文之間的關(guān)系，但是很多讀起來就很奇怪，兩者完全不是轉(zhuǎn)折的關(guān)系，用了however，就會讓人覺得有些無厘頭?；蛘呔褪巧舷挛闹g完全沒有邏輯聯(lián)系，就是兩個(gè)單句湊在了一起。還是這句話，一篇文章和流水似的，不能斷。中間斷了那就不叫好文章了。即使前一句與有一句沒有接續(xù)詞，它們在邏輯上也是要能承接的。

GRE作文范文：過度專業(yè)化問題

GRE寫作題目：

“Academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years that scholars' ideas reach only a narrow audience. Until scholars can reach a wider audience，their ideas will have little use.”

近些年來，學(xué)科已經(jīng)細(xì)化到了相當(dāng)?shù)某潭纫灾劣趯W(xué)者們的理念只影響小范圍的人群。除非學(xué)者們能擁有影響等大范圍的人群，否則他們的理念將幾乎毫無用處。

GRE作文范文：

Although academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years，scholars' ideas can still reach a wide audience by the advantage of the knowledge structure. We can simply put that it is the human beings' knowledge structure that makes it possible for a scholar's ideas in his specialized discipline to reach a much wider audiences who don't necessarily belong to his own discipline.

The reason why I draw this conclusion will be illustrated by recalling the process of social evolution.

During the passed centuries，the social economy has been greatly boosted by the revolutions in science and technology，which in turn increases the width and depth of academic disciplines to solve unencountered and more complex problems arising in the new situations. To solve new problems，we probably need new methods. That will undoubtedly calls for invention of new ideas，which will certainly adds to human beings' knowledge. Thus with the progress of science and technology，more and more knowledge will be added to the old system. A new problem will come： how the newly obtained knowledge is organized. This problem will be clear when we make classification of the new knowledge according to the old knowledge system. If there is content of the newly-get that doesn't properly belong to any sort of the old system，it means a

new discipline will emerge. But could we just assert that the newly formed discipline doesn't possess any relationship with any of the old ones? Certainly not. This is because the new knowledge is obtained through the old methods，which obviously means the new knowledge do have some connections with some old disciplines，otherwise I am quite sure we could not find it!

From the above，we can easily reach the conclusion that every academic discipline has certain relationships with some other ones. The structure of human's knowledge is just like the complexity of a net! And also it is a natural trend that academic disciplines become more and more specialized.

With the depositing and specializing process of knowledge，it causes humans to accommodate themselves to this situation. Because the God gives every person a limited time and energy，it is necessary for a person，who wants to make progress in his discipline，to adjust his knowledge structure to adapt to his research domain，that is to say，to be more devoted to his own research area. On the other hand，if he cares too much for unrelated or less related area，he will probably not be able to bring innovation to his main academic discipline. Simply put，we almost cannot find a man who constructs the Theory of Relativity and in the mean time composes symphony like Mozart's! So we can say every scholar must be more devoted to his own discipline than to others，but a wider knowledge of other disciplines sometimes involuntarily invokes sparks of new ideas.

GRE issue題目及寫作思路：掌權(quán)者五年讓位

題目

"In any profession--business, politics, education, government--those in power should step down after five years. The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership."

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

題干分析

在任何領(lǐng)域中----商業(yè)、政治、教育、政府----掌權(quán)者應(yīng)該在五年后就讓位。這是任何機(jī)構(gòu)獲得成功的最好的方式：通過更新領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者而保持活力。

OUTLINE

Limiting the term of leadership is an effective way to prevent corruption and lack of initiatives.

1. When leaders have no fear of losing their power, they tend to abuse their power.

2. A new leadership usually has greater initiative and would ring in new ideas.

3. However, in certain realms such as business it might not be o necessary to limit the term of leadership.

4. Furthermore, new leaders often lack the necessary skill and experience to cope with existing problems; therefore, they need a period of time for adaptation.

GRE作文范文：想法付諸行動的困難性

GRE寫作題目：想法付諸行動的困難性

It is easy to welcome innovation and accept new ideas. What most people find difficult, however, is accepting the way these new ideas are put into practice.

擁護(hù)革新和接受新想法很簡單。但是在大多數(shù)人們看來，最困難的是接受把這些新想法付諸實(shí)現(xiàn)的方式。

GRE寫作范文：

The writer of the issue connotates an ironic phenomenon: though innovation is required in our era and eulogized by most people, application of it is clannished vehemently because of the fear of failure and the possibility of obtained possession and tradition impairing. The author grasps the paradox psychology of most people and pertinently reveals a universal mentality.

As is known that innovation may bring big progress and result in even a revolutionary transition of a society: the elevated efficiency of work, the ameliorated life, the enticing fruit of new technology and so on. Following with innovation of the second industrial revolution, great changes took place and immediately a renewed world unfolded before us with the application of its fruits. Seeing unimaginable profits and the magic power, who (including the society and government) can suppress their agitating desire to restrict development of innovation?

Unfortunately, innovation doesn't always follow the people's will and always acts like an uncontroled horse running in the plain. Worrying about the side-effect, people have to hold their desire back but admire those who are brave enough to taste crabs for the first time. Not everyone possesses the same courage as Biil Gate's, who dare invest on a fresh field and give up the chance of studying in Harvard University, which is the dream of most aggressive young people. Often, pondering what they have already possessed with what they might get from innovation, most people prefer the former to the latter, even content to sacrifice the latter to ensure the integer of the former. For example, a department may enroll those who are not very deft in the work but behave complaisant before higher-ups and deny to those who stick to their innovational opinion obstinately. After all, it is required more to cooperate with others harmoniously and conform to the traditional rules nowadays than to creat a new law according to individual penchant, in any company and corporation.

Maybe, some one argues that, how to cultivate innovation if personality should abdicate to interests of collective? Does the statement above alludes that employees should do nothing but keep silent and follow what the higher-ups dictated, strangling their inspiration to accord to the criterion today? No doubt, such supposition is rediculous. I mean that employees should try to approach their original though to tenet of the collective, not attempt to disobey the existed norm, respect suggestion and supposition of others and circumspect the innovation and then discuss with all the members in the company. That is, responsibility should be taken before the innovation is applied to practice.

Of course, many people don't have the ability that controling their compulsion of carrying their innovation into application. It doesn't lack of people who dare not apply innovation, and people who hold innovational thought are not scarc either, however,those who possess both of the two abilities and are lucky enough to encounter a proper opportunity to release their innovation is very few. The seperation of spirit of application and creation of innovation is the root of the the strange phenomenon, that innovation and new ideas are here and there while the acceptance and combination of them with application is too little to be heard.