gre考試寫作建議看了嗎
gre考試的情況受到了很多學(xué)子的關(guān)注，那么你是否清楚gre寫作考試呢?今天小編給大家?guī)韌re考試寫作建議看了嗎，希望能夠幫助到大家，下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。
gre考試寫作建議看了嗎?
首先，給出了gre寫作考試題庫。經(jīng)過前輩幾年的總結(jié)，計算機考試本身已經(jīng)沒有懸念。高頻、模版、示例、范文、大量資料充斥著互聯(lián)網(wǎng)，并被專業(yè)人士和機構(gòu)匯總印刷?？忌荚嚽爸恍杌▋扇齻€月的時間練習(xí)，申請的分?jǐn)?shù)一點都不成問題。對一個有良好基礎(chǔ)的人來說，一兩個月就足夠了。但問題也隨之而來。每個人都使用相同的參考資料，寫作水平也一樣?？磥砜脊俜植磺搴脡?，只能給出最安全的分?jǐn)?shù)。
其次，由于即興創(chuàng)作的傾向，雖然語言逐漸向標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的書面英語靠攏，但仍缺乏時間的沉淀，無法一步到位地達(dá)到gre考試寫作本身的特點。就像形狀但不是精神。
最后，可以說，大部分作品還處于臨摹階段，而不是獨立創(chuàng)作階段。因為有現(xiàn)成的模板和例子，在范文的指導(dǎo)下，gre寫作方法,gre寫作怎么練模仿寫作的結(jié)構(gòu)和觀點。所以它經(jīng)常導(dǎo)致一篇作文看起來像那樣，但事實上，它沒有意義。對題目的意義和作文的目的缺乏透徹的理解。
綜上所述，有幾個原因?qū)е麓蠖鄶?shù)考前付出了無數(shù)汗水和努力的考生最終未能達(dá)到這個邪惡的理想分?jǐn)?shù)。為了解決這個問題，這里有一些gre寫作考試建議，
GRE詞匯。很多人在寫作前都在問是否需要背誦紅皮書上的單詞。答案是否定的，《紅寶書》中的單詞是為筆試的中文部分而收集整理的，與作文沒有多大關(guān)系。作文的高級水平還是那些。當(dāng)機器或考官看到它時，他或她會立即把它鎖上。如果他或她知道如何寫議論文，他或她將依賴他們。此外，一些常用動詞和名詞的同義詞應(yīng)分成若干組記憶。英語修辭不是華麗的，而是多變的。句型應(yīng)該是可變的，表達(dá)相同意思的詞也應(yīng)該是可變的。原來英語單調(diào)，重復(fù)是禁忌。
GRE模板。如何使用模板不是使用模板，而是合理使用模板。因為對初學(xué)者來說，一目了然是件好事。什么是結(jié)構(gòu)?模板是結(jié)構(gòu)。模板是骨架，支撐，但不是靈魂。當(dāng)然，靈魂部分是文章的主要目的，靠自己不懈的寫作，不斷的研究去探索和發(fā)現(xiàn)。不要依賴模板。沒有靈魂的骷髏得不到高分。
練習(xí)。實踐必須從頭到尾進(jìn)行。從量變到質(zhì)變的突破還需要時間。
在考試中?？记暗哪Ｐ蜏y試是為了讓大家抓緊時間，更好地進(jìn)一步檢查缺失，彌補缺失。在考場里，面對危險，我們不應(yīng)感到困惑。不管出現(xiàn)什么樣的問題，我們相信我們以前見過他們，沒有他們的家人，我們無法改變。當(dāng)然，我們在實踐中需要不斷提高自己的知識基礎(chǔ)。
GRE作文范文：過度專業(yè)化問題
GRE寫作題目：
“Academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years that scholars' ideas reach only a narrow audience. Until scholars can reach a wider audience，their ideas will have little use.”
近些年來，學(xué)科已經(jīng)細(xì)化到了相當(dāng)?shù)某潭纫灾劣趯W(xué)者們的理念只影響小范圍的人群。除非學(xué)者們能擁有影響等大范圍的人群，否則他們的理念將幾乎毫無用處。
GRE作文范文：
Although academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years，scholars' ideas can still reach a wide audience by the advantage of the knowledge structure. We can simply put that it is the human beings' knowledge structure that makes it possible for a scholar's ideas in his specialized discipline to reach a much wider audiences who don't necessarily belong to his own discipline.
The reason why I draw this conclusion will be illustrated by recalling the process of social evolution.
During the passed centuries，the social economy has been greatly boosted by the revolutions in science and technology，which in turn increases the width and depth of academic disciplines to solve unencountered and more complex problems arising in the new situations. To solve new problems，we probably need new methods. That will undoubtedly calls for invention of new ideas，which will certainly adds to human beings' knowledge. Thus with the progress of science and technology，more and more knowledge will be added to the old system. A new problem will come： how the newly obtained knowledge is organized. This problem will be clear when we make classification of the new knowledge according to the old knowledge system. If there is content of the newly-get that doesn't properly belong to any sort of the old system，it means a
new discipline will emerge. But could we just assert that the newly formed discipline doesn't possess any relationship with any of the old ones? Certainly not. This is because the new knowledge is obtained through the old methods，which obviously means the new knowledge do have some connections with some old disciplines，otherwise I am quite sure we could not find it!
From the above，we can easily reach the conclusion that every academic discipline has certain relationships with some other ones. The structure of human's knowledge is just like the complexity of a net! And also it is a natural trend that academic disciplines become more and more specialized.
With the depositing and specializing process of knowledge，it causes humans to accommodate themselves to this situation. Because the God gives every person a limited time and energy，it is necessary for a person，who wants to make progress in his discipline，to adjust his knowledge structure to adapt to his research domain，that is to say，to be more devoted to his own research area. On the other hand，if he cares too much for unrelated or less related area，he will probably not be able to bring innovation to his main academic discipline. Simply put，we almost cannot find a man who constructs the Theory of Relativity and in the mean time composes symphony like Mozart's! So we can say every scholar must be more devoted to his own discipline than to others，but a wider knowledge of other disciplines sometimes involuntarily invokes sparks of new ideas.
GRE issue題目及寫作思路：掌權(quán)者五年讓位
題目
"In any profession--business, politics, education, government--those in power should step down after five years. The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership."
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
題干分析
在任何領(lǐng)域中----商業(yè)、政治、教育、政府----掌權(quán)者應(yīng)該在五年后就讓位。這是任何機構(gòu)獲得成功的最好的方式：通過更新領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者而保持活力。
OUTLINE
Limiting the term of leadership is an effective way to prevent corruption and lack of initiatives.
1. When leaders have no fear of losing their power, they tend to abuse their power.
2. A new leadership usually has greater initiative and would ring in new ideas.
3. However, in certain realms such as business it might not be o necessary to limit the term of leadership.
4. Furthermore, new leaders often lack the necessary skill and experience to cope with existing problems; therefore, they need a period of time for adaptation.
gre考試寫作建議看了嗎相關(guān)文章：
★ 英語寫作