GRE寫作減少拼寫扣分要這么練
GRE寫作中國考生的平均成績只有3分。而扣分中，拼寫錯誤往往就會導(dǎo)致0.5-1分的扣分。今天小編給大家?guī)砹薌RE寫作減少拼寫扣分要這么練 ,希望能夠幫助到大家，一起來學(xué)習(xí)吧。
GRE寫作減少拼寫扣分要這么練
GRE寫作拼寫錯誤也會扣分?
在GRE寫作中，出現(xiàn)拼寫錯誤會導(dǎo)致扣分，但具體評分標準可能許多同學(xué)都不清楚。實際上，根據(jù)ETS曾經(jīng)發(fā)布過的作文評分標準，考生如果在寫作中出現(xiàn)較多的拼寫錯誤，可能會導(dǎo)致0.5-1分的扣分。也就是說，在滿分六分的作文中，考生的拼寫錯誤往往就會帶走6分之1的分數(shù)，代價還是相當高昂的。很多人因為拼寫扣分，導(dǎo)致自己作文從優(yōu)秀的4分掉到平均分3分，可謂損失慘重。
GRE寫作拼錯出錯原因?qū)Σ叻治鲋v解
那么，是什么原因?qū)е铝薌RE寫作中不少同學(xué)頻頻出現(xiàn)拼寫錯誤呢?小編認為主要有以下幾點原因：
1. 自身缺乏對拼寫扣分的認識
考生在面對寫作時，往往首先會想到的都是諸如文章框架結(jié)構(gòu)、邏輯思路推理論證、素材論據(jù)使用以及好詞妙句的語言組織和準確運用這些看似高大上的內(nèi)容。這實際上并沒有任何問題，畢竟這些要素才是構(gòu)成一篇GRE高分作文的主要組成部分。然而有些考生過于看重這些內(nèi)容，因此對拼寫就采取了忽視甚至無視的態(tài)度，覺得只要在規(guī)定時間內(nèi)寫出好文章即可，一兩個拼寫錯誤就不用太過在意了。實際上這種想法是有失偏頗的，因為單從分值上來說拼寫問題和上面提到的任何一點都完全相同。大家花的心思比重差距巨大，最后分值卻一樣，而實際上許多拼寫錯誤只要考生稍加留意就可以完全避免。因此，考生在心態(tài)上必須重視拼寫錯誤。
對策分享
既然知道了拼寫問題的重要性，那么考生在之后的寫作中，就需要更進一步糾正這類問題加以重視，其實大家在這方面需要投入的時間和精力都很少，每次寫完作文預(yù)留出一定時間返回檢查一下，在寫作過程中多加注意即可，寫作中的拼寫可以說是投入產(chǎn)出比最高的部分了。稍微留點神就能輕松拿到分數(shù)。
2. 不清楚拼寫出問題到底會扣多少分
這個問題其實很多人都存在，就是缺乏對于寫作評分和扣分標準的基本認識。如同上文所言，拼寫所占分值在0.5-1分之間，對于6分作文來說并不算少。但由于許多考生在復(fù)習(xí)前并沒有具體了解過評分標準，或者只是了解了一個大概，因此對于這點并不太清楚。至于要出現(xiàn)多少拼寫錯誤才會被扣分，或者說容錯率有多少，雖然ETS并沒有公布具體數(shù)據(jù)，但根據(jù)小編總結(jié)印象，一般來說只要是不影響閱讀的關(guān)鍵性詞匯出錯，那么容錯率大致在5個左右。如果不到這個數(shù)值，考生往往并不會被扣掉分數(shù)，但如果一路下來到處是TYPO，那么被扣分也是在所難免的。
對策分享
小編建議大家拿出復(fù)習(xí)用的官方指南OG，再把寫作部分的評分標準仔細研究一下。同時對于不同評分的作文，也進行一些適當對比，看看拼寫錯誤到底會造成如何的扣分。同時在平時練習(xí)中也要加強對拼寫問題的重視程度，盡可能確保這部分的成績不要損失。
3. 手腦不協(xié)調(diào)打字TYPO現(xiàn)象嚴重
GRE寫作是機考，因此考生寫文章全靠鍵盤打字，這對于一些習(xí)慣了手寫的考生來說可能就不太適應(yīng)，打字基本功不到家沒練好，打字速度偏慢等等問題一直困擾著部分考生，而其中因為打字不熟練所導(dǎo)致的TYPO錯誤也是一大問題。明明寫作很有思路，卻因為不熟悉鍵盤手指反應(yīng)跟不上，最后往往就會出現(xiàn)拼寫錯誤。
對策分享
打字問題直接對寫作造成影響，拼寫出錯、寫作速度太慢等等都是需要盡快解決的問題。小編建議大家在平時練習(xí)寫作的時候就開始使用電腦來進行操作，假如自己打字技能不熟練，那么請務(wù)必做好事先練習(xí)，畢竟這是基本功，不僅是眼前的GRE考試，以后留學(xué)生活中也是必備的基礎(chǔ)技能。
GRE寫作高分范文：忠誠
GRE寫作題目：
Most people are taught that loyalty is a virtue. But loyalty-whether to one's friends，to one's school or place of employment，or to any institution-is all too often a destructive rather than a positive force.
大多數(shù)人被告知忠誠是一種美德。但是無論是對朋友、對學(xué)校、對單位還是對任何機構(gòu)，忠誠時常都是弊大于利的。
GRE寫作范文：
I disagree with the author for he has confused the faithfulness with the misguided or overextended loyalty. In fact，loyalty does be a cherished virtue that should be given enough emphasis.
Loyalty，a kind of lasting persistence and its precondition is that the subject of fidelity is worthy of such strong emotion. In each society，loyalty is a indispensable and vital part of the system of morality. No matter in schools，at home or at work，first midst and last，people accept a similar education that as an individual，he or she should first have a sense of ligeance，that is work for the whole. Of course，the subjects of loyalty are various including scientific theory，friends，family，schools，places of employment and the nation. A vivid example can lend support to the statement is the heroical astronomer - Bronow，who advanced Copernicus' theory that the earth and other planets revolve around the sun，enraged the Roma church that held the Ptolemaic system of astronomy and was burnt to death just because he refused to give up his scientific theory. It is the lasting loyalty toward truth that lead Bronow to sacrifice himself. And people all respect such duteous spirit. However，without loyalty，the morality of a society will deteriorate into apathy desert and everyone just lives for him/herself，that is to say，no one is willing to pay loyalty to the whole，then finally the human civilization will fall apart.
However，on the other hand，the fidelity should not be confused with misguided or overextended loyalty and the latter is all too often a destructive rather than a positive force. People all hold that mutual loyalty between friends is the basis of lasting friendship. But people should also realize that true loyalty and authentic responsibility for a friend are not only always believing him or her unconditionally but also persuading，helping and even impeaching him or her when him or her has committed serious mistakes or even crimes. Of course，when facing up to such painful dilemma，each one will hesitate because he or she is afraid of being censured to betray his or her friend and some one may choose to keep slient in order to insist of the so-called loyalty.
In fact，such behavior may prevent his or her friend from taking right actions. The same to a school，a family，a company even the nation，when the subject that people once string along with no longer deserves loyalty，people should resolutely choose to be loyal to the truth，the justice and the humanity. That calls for people are always alert to what they think right and what they think wrong，via doing so，people can change their mind for right choice on time
To sum up，people should insist on true loyalty，and always avoid being the victim of the misguided or overextended loyalty. In the world，there is nothing that can be always absolutely right or wrong and changing happens all the time. So people should always hold deep insight to discern what deserves their loyalty and what does not
GRE寫作高分范文：生動剖析寫作
GRE寫作題目：
Too much time, money, and energy are spent developing new and more elaborate technology. Society should instead focus on maximizing the use of existing technology for the immediate benefit of its citizens.
GRE寫作范文：
I must say that I reject this statement. While it is true that we need to support society as much as possible with current technology, that does not in any way mean that we should stop progressing simply because our current technology cannot handle all the problems we have brought to it. Does that mean that we should simply accept the status quo and make do? No, I don’t think so. To do so would be tantamount to adopting a fatalistic approach; I think most people would reject that.
Technology has helped, and it has hurt. Without it, we would never have our standard of living, nor quality of nutrition, expectation of a long and productive life span, and the unshakable belief that our lives can be made even better. But it has also brought us universal pollution, weapons so powerful as to be capable of rendering us extinct, and the consequent fear for our survival as species and as a planet. Technology is indeed a double-edged sword. And yet, I still have to argue in its favor, because without it, we have no hope.
Some might argue that we would be better off without technology. They might say that a return to a less technologically driven approach to life would have the benefits of reducing stress and allowing us to live simpler, happier lives, like those of our forebears. Such an idea is seductive, so much so that much of art and all of nostalgia are devoted to it. But upon closer inspection, one realizes that such a move would only return us to a life of different kinds of stress, one of false simplicity, one fraught with danger. It would be a life without antibiotics where a minor cut could prove deadly. It would be a life where childbirth is the main killer of women, and where an emergency is dealt with in terms of hours and days instead of minutes and hours; a life where there are no phones or cars or planes or central heating, no proven drug therapies to treat mental illness, no computers. Would this world really make people happy?
What we already have, we have. And since the only way to move is forward, instead of allowing ourselves to be paralyzed by fear and worry, we need to learn how to clean up the pollution we have caused, and how to deal with a world that feeds on weapons and mass destruction. Doing these things means having to move away from technology into a more difficult realm, that of diplomacy and compromise: to move from the bully stance of “I am bigger and better and I have more toys and so I win” to a place where everyone wins.
Technology is the thing that will allow people to do that. But, advanced as it is, it is still in its infancy. We have to allow it to grow up and mature in order to reap the real rewards that it can bring. And there are even greater rewards ahead of us than what the world has already experienced. When technology is pushed to the outer edge, that is where serendipitous discoveries can occur. This has been seen throughout technological advancement, but the easiest example is probably the space program which made us think, really hard, about how to do things in a different environment. It gave us telecommunications, new fabrics and international cooperation. Paramedical devices, so that people can be treated even as they are being transported to the hosptal, are a direct development of that technology. None of this would have happened in the time frame that it did if we had not pushed for technological advancement. If we had decided to “focus on maximizing the use of existing technology” instead of foolishly reaching for the stars, we would not have made those discoveries which now are the bedrock of the 21st century.
GRE寫作分析：
字數(shù)：651
語言：平實的語句完全沒有網(wǎng)絡(luò)流行模板的痕跡，也是許多過了6級的考生通過練習(xí)可以達到的水平。
I must say that I reject this statement.
Does that mean that we should simply accept the status quo and make do? No, I don’t think so.
Technology has helped, and it has hurt.
Technology is indeed a double-edged sword. And yet, I still have to argue in its favor, because without it, we have no hope.
GRE寫作相關(guān)文章：
GRE寫作減少拼寫扣分要這么練
