GRE寫作2個(gè)觀點(diǎn)類常見錯(cuò)誤實(shí)例講解

GRE寫作2個(gè)觀點(diǎn)類常見錯(cuò)誤實(shí)例講解,快來看看吧，下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。

GRE寫作2個(gè)觀點(diǎn)類常見錯(cuò)誤實(shí)例講解

GRE寫作觀點(diǎn)類常見錯(cuò)誤介紹

GRE寫作在提煉觀點(diǎn)時(shí)出問題的情況其實(shí)很常見，其中最主要的錯(cuò)誤有兩種，一種是根據(jù)素材提煉出的觀點(diǎn)論點(diǎn)過于寬泛，根本沒有體現(xiàn)出題目的特色，而只是給出了一個(gè)很大很空泛的觀點(diǎn)。另外一種則是論點(diǎn)過于狹窄，也就是太過針對題材本身而沒有辦法引申出更多深層次的思考。這兩種錯(cuò)誤看似互相矛盾，但對于缺乏GRE作文寫作經(jīng)驗(yàn)的考生來說，無論出現(xiàn)那種錯(cuò)誤都需要引起警惕，否則作文成績將很難有所提升。

1. 觀點(diǎn)太空太寬

在各類教導(dǎo)寫作的材料中，大家應(yīng)該時(shí)常會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)關(guān)于強(qiáng)調(diào)GRE寫作論點(diǎn)一定要寫得具體，越細(xì)越好的指導(dǎo)建議。而考生經(jīng)常出現(xiàn)的問題就是會(huì)出現(xiàn)一些很寬泛的論點(diǎn)句，以至于在較短的篇幅里并不能充分展開，甚至有時(shí)候會(huì)造成觀點(diǎn)重疊。

比如去年2月份的GRE考試中有一篇作文，題目要求探討關(guān)于移動(dòng)電話對于現(xiàn)代人生活的影響。假如考生提煉出的觀點(diǎn)是“Mobile phones have changed our life greatly. ”這句只是說手機(jī)很大程度上改變了人們的生活，但是并未點(diǎn)明從哪些方面上帶來了改變，因此把這個(gè)觀點(diǎn)具化一下：“Mobile phones can serve as a connection to the Internet, which can be extremely convenient for obtaining information wherever you may be.”這樣一來大家既有具體內(nèi)容可寫，也可以避免觀點(diǎn)過于寬泛大而無當(dāng)?shù)那闆r。

而同樣是在去年2月份，還有一篇作文的題目則討論了關(guān)于廣告泛濫對于社會(huì)輿論造成的干擾。如果考生只是簡單寫“Advertising has bad effects on all of society. ”廣告有不良影響顯然是不夠的。我們需要寫出具體的方面，比如“Advertisements which exaggerate the function of the products may mislead the consumers.”這樣具體的觀點(diǎn)才是GRE考官真正希望看到的內(nèi)容，言之有物也需要從實(shí)際出發(fā)。

2. 觀點(diǎn)太細(xì)太窄

與論點(diǎn)過于寬泛相對的，則是一些考生把論點(diǎn)定得太過狹窄，自己把自己逼近了死胡同以至于沒有展開的空間甚至沒有進(jìn)一步支持的必要。這類句子與其說是觀點(diǎn)，倒不如說是事實(shí)的陳述或者只是舉了個(gè)例子而已。

去年4月GRE作文中曾出現(xiàn)過這樣一道題目，講的是某個(gè)地方當(dāng)?shù)厝碎_展旅游業(yè)的看法。有的考生直接把觀點(diǎn)寫成“There are more local residents engaged in tourism industry. ”這其實(shí)并非觀點(diǎn)，只是陳述了一個(gè)事實(shí)就是在當(dāng)?shù)卦絹碓蕉嗳碎_始從事旅游業(yè)，可改為：“Tourism brings huge economic benefits to local residents.”就比較容易展開了。

而今年1月份的GRE作文中也有一道討論不可再生燃料如何持續(xù)利用的題目，如果考生寫出“The consumption of fossil fuels increase in recent years. ”這樣一句看似結(jié)論的話既缺乏數(shù)據(jù)支持也毫無說服力可言，等于是自己把話說死了，后續(xù)要怎么展開?正確寫法是給出論述重點(diǎn)，假設(shè)原因，比如“The consumption of fossil fuels increasing in recent years results from two factors.”之后就會(huì)好寫很多。

以上兩種觀點(diǎn)上的錯(cuò)誤，無論出現(xiàn)哪一種，對考生來說都將意味著難以取得高分，小編建議大家與其花更多時(shí)間磨煉寫作技巧提升寫作速度，還不如多看一些題目和范文，在提煉觀點(diǎn)上增加一些練習(xí)，如此才能更好地避免因?yàn)閷懽饔^點(diǎn)出錯(cuò)而沒能拿到作文高分的情況。

GRE范文參考

The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

Score 6 Response

he recommendation presents a view that I would agree is successful most of the time, but one that I cannot fully support due to the “all or nothing” impression it gives.

Certainly as an educator I agree fully that the best way to elicit positive response from students is to make use of students’ positive energy and then encourage actions that you would like to see repeated. It is human nature that we all want to be accepted and achieve on some level, and when people in authority provide feedback that we have done something well, the drive to repeat the action that was praised is bound to be particularly strong.

This blanket statement would obviously pay dividends in situations in which a teacher desires to have students repeat particular behaviors. For example, if an educator is attempting to teach students proper classroom etiquette, it would be appropriate to openly praise a student who raises his or her hand when wishing to speak or address the class. In such cases, the teacher may also help shape positive behaviors by ignoring a student who is trying to interject without approval from the teacher. In fact, the decision to ignore students who are exhibiting inappropriate behaviors of this type could work very well in this situation, as the stakes are not very high and the intended outcome can likely be achieved by such a method. However, it is important to note here that this tactic would only be effective in such a “l(fā)ow-stakes” situation, as when a student speaks without raising her hand first. As we will discuss below, ignoring a student who hits another student, or engages in more serious misbehaviors, would not be effective or prudent.

To expand on this point, it is important for teachers to be careful when working with the second half of this statement, only ignoring negative actions that are not serious. Take for instance a student who is misbehaving just by chatting with a fellow classmate. This student might not be presenting much of a problem and may be simply seeking attention. Ignoring the student might, in fact, be the best solution. Now assume the negative action is the improper administering of chemicals in a science experiment or the bullying of a fellow student. To ignore these negative actions would be absurd and negligent. Now you are allowing a problem to persist, one that could potentially lead to much bigger and more dangerous issues. In a more serious situation, addressing the negative actions quickly and properly could stop the problem it in its tracks. It is for reasons like this that I do not advocate the idea that a teacher can be successful by simply ignoring negative actions.

I do, however, greatly support the idea that the central focus of teaching should be to build on and encourage positive actions. However, the author’s all-encompasing statement leaves too many negative possibilities for the classroom. Perhaps a better way to phrase this statement would be to say, “The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones that are not debilitating to class efficiency or the safety of any individual”.

Thus, in the original statement, there are indeed some good intentions, and there could be a lot of merit in adopting its basic principles. Data proves that positive support can substantially increase motivation and desire in students and contribute to positive achievements. In fact, most studies of teaching efficacy indicate that praising positive actions and ignoring negative ones can create a more stable and efficient classroom.It needs to be stressed, however, that this tool is only effective at certain levels of misbehavior. As mentioned above, when the behavior is precipitated by feelings of revenge, power or total self-worthlessness, this methodology will likely not work. It is likely to be very successful, however, when the drive behind the misbehavior is simple attention seeking. In many of these instances, if the teacher demonstrates clearly that inappropriate behavior does not result in the gaining of attention, students are more likely to seek attention by behaving properly. Should the student choose this path, then the ignoring has worked and when the positive behavior is exhibited, then the teacher can utilize the first part of the theory and support or praise this behavior.Now it is much more likely to be repeated. If the student does not choose this path and instead elects to raise the actions to a higher level that presents a more serious issue, then ignorance alone cannot work and other methods must be employed.

In conclusion, one can appreciate the credo expressed in this instance, but surely we all can see the potential error of following it through to the extreme.

Reader Commentary

This response receives a 6 for its well-articulated, insightful analysis of the issue. Rather than simply rejecting or accepting the prompt, the writer argues that the recommendation made by the prompt can often be true but is too “all or nothing“ to be endorsed without qualification. The writer turns this idea into an insightful position by providing examples and evidence to fully and persuasively support its nuanced argument. The response offers nicely detailed situations that provide compelling support for a claim that the recommendation can, in fact, work. At the same time, it also highlights the recommendation’s limits using additional specific, detailed examples. Particularly persuasive is the fourth paragraph, in which the writer compares the impact of ignoring minor behavioral problems like talking in class to the potential costs of ignoring more serious issues like bullying. Thus, the writer recognizes that the prompt’s claim, as well as his/her own, is inevitably dependent on the specific context for its success or failure. Throughout the response, the writer demonstrates the ability to convey ideas fluently and precisely, using effective vocabulary and sentence variety. This sentence demonstrates the level of language facility seen throughout the response: ”It is human nature that we all want to be accepted and achieve on some level, and when people in authority provide feedback that we have done something well, the drive to repeat the action that was praised is bound to be particularly strong.”

新版GRE寫作新題庫：Argument

題目：

The following appeared in a magazine article about planning for retirement.

"Clearview should be a top choice for anyone seeking a place to retire, because it has spectacular natural beauty and a consistent climate. Another advantage is that housing costs in Clearview have fallen significantly during the past year, and taxes remain lower than those in neighboring towns. Moreover, Clearview's mayor promises many new programs to improve schools, streets, and public services. And best of all, retirees in Clearview can also expect excellent health care as they grow older, since the number of physicians in the area is far greater than the national average."

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

中文翻譯：

由于Clearview的天然景色和溫和氣候，它應(yīng)該成為那些為退休后尋找生活地的人的首選。另一項(xiàng)好處是，Clearview的房價(jià)在去年顯著下降，房地產(chǎn)稅一直比鄰近城市低。而且，Clearview的市長承諾了很多新方案來改學(xué)校、街道和公共服務(wù)。Clearview的退休人員也可以在老年時(shí)享受到出色的醫(yī)療服務(wù)，因?yàn)樵摰貐^(qū)的醫(yī)生數(shù)量高于全國平均水平。

寫一篇回應(yīng)，討論還需要何種具體的證據(jù)才能更好的評估上面的論證，并解釋這個(gè)證據(jù)是如何強(qiáng)化/削弱這篇文章的論證的。

此上就是為大家提供的新版GRE寫作新題庫Argument部分的內(nèi)容，希望大家能夠在練習(xí)中提高自己的寫作水平。

GRE寫作2個(gè)觀點(diǎn)類常見錯(cuò)誤實(shí)例講解相關(guān)文章：