GRE寫作看完題就動筆是大忌
GRE寫作看完題就動筆是大忌 這樣的寫法步驟更合理，快來一起學(xué)習(xí)吧，分享下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。
GRE寫作看完題就動筆是大忌 這樣的寫法步驟更合理
一：審題
一審新GRE作文的文體和格式，如書信有求職信、推薦信、回復(fù)信等，還有人物介紹、看圖說明等等不同要求的寫作題材，弄清文章的文體和格式是重要前提。審題不清會導(dǎo)致格式不規(guī)范，作文要求不合格，甚至因為跑題偏題的錯誤而失分。
二審新GRE寫作的內(nèi)容，先對題中的信息進行篩選，哪些是有用信息，哪些是無用信息，然后把有用信息按一定順序分小點列出來。
二：遣詞造句
1. 根據(jù)審題步驟所列出的內(nèi)容要點，列出文章中可能要用到的關(guān)鍵詞語(如動詞、短語等)。
2. 列出文章中可能用到的句型。
3. 列出文章中可能用到的語句間的連接詞。
4. 按內(nèi)容要點順序和所列詞語、句型寫出單句。
三：構(gòu)思成文
這是新GRE寫作的關(guān)鍵步驟。不能只是簡單翻譯內(nèi)容要點，要作一些適當(dāng)發(fā)揮，使整篇文章既有“骨架”，又有“血肉”。同時應(yīng)注意以下幾點：
1. 注意全文的時態(tài)運用，整篇文章的時態(tài)應(yīng)該保持一致性。
2. 注意短文的布局謀篇。恰當(dāng)?shù)亩温鋭澐?，前后語句的連貫，句型的選擇，連接詞的運用，使文章層次分明，語言暢通，連接恰當(dāng)，最終為文章增色出彩。
四：通讀檢查
這是完善GRE考試的寫作任務(wù)的最后步驟。通讀文章的同時，檢查前后內(nèi)容是否連貫，語言是否暢通，段落劃分是否分明，句型及連接詞的運用是否恰當(dāng)，時態(tài)運用是否一致，標點符號是否規(guī)范等等。完成了這些檢查并作出修改訂正，一定會使全文更加規(guī)范、更加自然流暢。
以上就是為大家介紹講解的新GRE寫作習(xí)慣培養(yǎng)和訓(xùn)練方法。在此特別提醒大家，新GRE寫作習(xí)慣的訓(xùn)練至關(guān)重要，沒有一個好的寫作習(xí)慣，在GRE考試中是很吃虧的，大家一定要培養(yǎng)適合自己的新GRE寫作習(xí)慣，為自己的新GRE作文負責(zé)。
GRE Issue寫作范文詳細解析
Topic
The following is a letter to the editor of the Atticus City newspaper
"Former Mayor Durant owes an apology to the city of Atticus. Both the damage to the River Bridge, which connects Atticus to Hartley, and the traffic problems we have long experienced on the bridge were actually caused 20 years ago by Durant. After all, he is the one who approved the construction of the bridge. If he had approved a wider and better-designed bridge, on which approximately the same amount of public money would have been spent, none of the damage or problems would have occurred. Instead, the River Bridge has deteriorated far more rapidly over the past 20 years than has the much longer Derby Bridge up the river. Even though the winters have been severe in the past several years, this is no excuse for the negligence and wastefulness of Durant."
Sample Essay
The author of this letter concludes in his or her argument that former Mayor Durant should apologize to the city of Atticus because he is at fault for damage that has occurred over a twenty-year time span to the River Bridge. The author also blames Mayor Durant for long-time traffic problems on the bridge, stating that Durant actually caused these problems twenty years before because he approved the construction of the bridge and did not approve a wider and better-designed bridge. The arguer may have a personal vendetta against Mayor Durant but the elements stated in the argument do not support such an accusation.
First of all, the author squarely places blame on Mayor Durant for the simple act of approving the construction of the bridge. There is no evidence presented that merely approving the building of the bridge had anything whatsoever to do with the damage that has occurred or the traffic problems on the bridge. It is entirely possible that Mr. Durant simply approved the idea of constructing the bridge and not the design of the bridge or the contractor that built it. Simply approving the construction of the bridge does not in and of itself cause damage to that bridge or any resulting traffic problems.
In addition, the arguer concludes that if Mayor Durant had approved a wider and better-designed bridge that there would be no damage or traffic problems, an argument for which there is no basis of proof offered. It is a well-known fact that bridges are subject to deterioration, particularly over a period of twenty years, no matter how well designed they may be. The author also fails to offer any supporting evidence to show that a more durable bridge with fewer traffic problems could have been built for approximately the same amount of public money. It seems likely that a wider bridge would have more damage problems rather than fewer, and probably would have cost more as well, whether public or private funds were used.
Furthermore, the arguer mentions that the River Bridge has deteriorated much more rapidly than the much longer Derby Bridge up the river. This groundless argument fails to take into account other possible reasons for the discrepancy in the deterioration of the two bridges such as traffic loads, location and other environmental variables. It is possible that the Derby Bridge was much more protected from the elements and rarely used by heavy truck traffic, for example. The author gives no basis for a direct comparison between the two bridges other than his or her personal opinion.
Finally, the letter writer refers to the "negligence and wastefulness" of Mayor Durant. The only action cited by the author is the approval of the bridge in the first place, which proves neither neglect nor wasting of anything. The sentence itself contains a non sequitur - firstly discussing the severe winters of the past several years, and then accusing Mr. Durant of waste and neglect. This accusation is unwarranted as well as unsupported in the author's argument.
In summary, the author simply makes groundless accusations without providing any real support for his or her argument. To make the argument convincing, the author would have to provide evidence that Mayor Durant approved a faulty bridge design or an unqualified construction company that caused the bridge's damage and traffic problems. The author should have also provided supporting details that show that the damage to the bridge is out of the ordinary and directly caused by Mayor Durant's decision to use inadequate construction materials or a poor design. Without more support, the author's point of view is unconvincing and not well reasoned.
GRE作文范例參考
Consciously Reconnecting
There may be times when we feel like our connection to the universe is closed. Maybe things don’t seem to be going well in our day, or our lives, or we may feel out of our element. The truth is, the universe is always there for us. We know that we create our experience with our thoughts, and this is another way we need to make a conscious decision about how we want to experience life. It is up to us to do the work of making the connection, because nobody can do it for us, though sometimes the universe may send us wake-up calls.
You can think of it as getting some fresh air. We are always breathing and the air is always around us, surrounding us, moving through us. But we may need to step outside of where we are in the moment—physically, mentally, or emotionally—and make the conscious choice to take a deep breath in order to feel the air coming in and going out. Whether this means stepping outside physically or merely shifting our thoughts, it is only our perception that changes; the air remains the same.
It is just as easy to reconnect with the universe. Using the same technique as a breath of fresh air, a deep breath can bring us back to our center. As we inhale, we fill our bodies with the oxygen needed to replenish our most basic physical needs, allowing the air to circulate within us. Exhaling, we release the stale, the used, the potentially toxic air, removing any blocks that may keep us from going deeper into the stillness that lies at our center where we connect to the universe. Feeling closed off does not need to be a negative experience. When we become conscious of it, we can think of the wholeness of a closed circuit, which allows electricity to connect and flow properly. Our bodies work the same way, and when we make that connection in our minds, it can help bring us back to the connection we seek.
GRE寫作看完題就動筆是大忌相關(guān)文章：
上一篇：GRE寫作論述觀點技巧講解
