GRE作文寫作詞匯要學(xué)會替換
GRE作文寫作詞匯要學(xué)會替換，避免重復(fù)用詞,快來一起學(xué)習(xí)吧，分享下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。
GRE作文：寫作詞匯要學(xué)會替換，避免重復(fù)用詞
GRE寫作用詞重復(fù)會扣多少分?
有人可能會問，寫作用詞重復(fù)問題有這么嚴(yán)重嗎?真的出現(xiàn)這種情況會扣多少分呢?按照GRE作文的評分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，遣詞造句方面的分值在1-1.5分左右，而用詞重復(fù)如果導(dǎo)致扣分，那么至少會扣掉0.5-1分，也就是說，本來屬于高分的4分作文，因為用詞問題，很可能直接就會掉到中國考生的寫作平均分3分的水平，而中國考生作文平均分在全球GRE考生中向來是偏低的，因此在這個部分扣分就意味著你的作文得分直接掉了個檔次，可以說是比較嚴(yán)重的問題了。
GRE寫作用詞單調(diào)原因分析
為什么不少考生會在GRE寫作中出現(xiàn)用詞單調(diào)的問題呢?原因主要有以下幾點：
1. 考生本身詞匯量不足
這是最常見導(dǎo)致寫作用詞單調(diào)的原因?？忌旧碚莆盏脑~匯量就偏少，又沒有專門訓(xùn)練或者背誦過寫作用詞，看的范文數(shù)量也不夠，準(zhǔn)備不足之下自然沒辦法寫出五花八門的詞匯來，所謂巧婦難為無米之炊，即是如此。
2. 有詞匯量但不會用
作為一名合格的GRE考生來說，背誦大量的詞匯是必須的。然而，考生對于背單詞的要求卻存在一些問題。不少人對GRE詞匯背誦的要求只停留在混個臉熟，能看懂或者大致了解含義就行，而少有考生去細(xì)究詞匯在句子中的具體用法。這也就導(dǎo)致了考生雖然認(rèn)識很多單詞，看著詞匯量挺大，但真到使用的時候，還是只會用那幾個常用的老詞。
3. 沒把握不敢使用
有些考生可能的確意識到了背單詞要學(xué)會使用的重要性，也掌握了一些新詞的使用方法，但因為缺乏練習(xí)，或者沒有人幫助批改審核，因此不敢在實際寫作中運用這些詞匯，覺得沒有把握，生怕用錯，所以饒了一圈，到頭來還是只能走求穩(wěn)路線，反復(fù)使用舊詞。
如何避免用詞重復(fù)問題
既然知道了用詞重復(fù)問題發(fā)生的原因，那么對應(yīng)的解決方案也就十分明確了?？忌枰龅挠袃牲c：
1. 儲備寫作用詞匯
首先如果是詞匯量不足的問題，那么大家就要開始有意識地積累一些詞匯了，特別是專門用于寫作的詞匯，小編建議各位考生可以多參考一下官方或者權(quán)威機構(gòu)出版的GRE作文高分范文或是黃金素材類的資料，從中收集一些自己不太用但在范文中出現(xiàn)頻率較高的詞匯，這些詞匯不僅適用于寫作，還能帶來高分，有很高的實用價值，大家多積累一些這方面的詞匯在寫作中和自己的習(xí)慣用詞多做替換，會起到不錯的效果，豐富文章的展現(xiàn)形式。
2. 實際運用詞匯
其次假如考生是因為不敢用新詞而產(chǎn)生問題，那么之后要做的就是多練筆了，大家可以不用進行完整的寫作練習(xí)，而是把注意力放在練習(xí)詞匯替換上，去找一些自己寫過的文章，用意思相同相近的詞匯進行替換，假如對詞匯用法沒有把握，通過查字典找例句或者通過論壇QQ群等方式求助他人確定其用法，充分掌握詞匯的正確用法，如此一來自然能夠在考試中放心大膽地用上新詞，提升作文用詞質(zhì)量。
GRE寫作常用詞匯可替換新詞匯：
able→ capable, in a(ny) position
all the time→ continually, continuously, constantly, perpetually
a lot→ noticeably, considerably, a great deal, substantially
a lot of→ many, numerous, a wide variety of (themes), a whole range of, a wide spectrum of (problems, themes, etc),an abundance of (opportunities, sources etc.)
always→ invariably
amount→ quantity
as a result→ consequently
basically→ essentially, in essence, substantially
be, amount to→ constitute
therefore→ consequently
thing→ element, aspect, object, factor, consideration
too→ excessively, inordinately, unduly
too many→ an excessive number of, a disproportionate number of
too much→ excessive(ly)
try→ endeavor, strive
understand→ appreciate
ups and downs→ vicissitudes (of war, history, fortune)
very→ extremely, in the extreme, immensely, intensely
yield→ produce(results)
新GRE寫作范文：競爭利弊問題
題目：
"Competition is ultimately more beneficial than detrimental to society."
歸根結(jié)底，競爭對于社會是利多弊少。
正文：
Darwin suggested that the process of evolution is one based on competition. This deadly competition weeds out the weak and only the fittest of the species survives. Humans, being the product of millions of years of evolution, are by nature, competitive beings. Yet, humans are also social beings. Like the bees in the hive, we are not very successful living completely on our own. We need to cooperate with other individuals for our survival. Thus, a conflict ensues, between our innate competitiveness, and our need to cooperate. There are pros and cons associated with both. However, it is my belief that overall, competition, is more detrimental than beneficial to human society.
First, let us try to identify why there is competition in the first place. In an environment abundant with resources, where supply outstrips demand, there is very little need for the inhabitants to fight with each other over them. This is not the case on planet earth. Resources are limited, and there is constant jostling to get to the front of the queue to get acquire them. For example, thousands of prospective students apply to gain entrance to top universities around the world, but there are only a handful of places in those universities. Thus, there is competition to get into to these hallowed institutions of higher learning.From a utilitarian perspective, competition is a good thing. In evolution it is responsible for the elimination of "weak" genes. In the business environment, it gets rid of the weaker players. In politics, it weeds out unpopular candidates. In academia, it gets rid of weak students.
Furthermore, competition leads to self improvement. Businesses will strive to offer better products and services at lesser prices. The consumer reaps rich rewards from this competitive spirit. Politicians strive to do the utmost for the people, so they would get reelected. Students excel in there studies, trying to outdo each other.
Thus, ostensibly, competition is responsible for the betterment of the society as a whole. However, this is just the superficial view. Underneath the surface, competition, in every aspect, is slowly eating away at the very fabric of the society.
While it is true to say that competition in corporate world has brought great benefits to the consumer, the society as "Missed A here"whole is playing a great price for it. Most businesses are exploiting cheap labour in the third world to maximise their profits. There are thousands of sweatshops run by well known western corporations in countries like Indonesia, Bangladesh and China. People are forced to work in squalid conditions, often 16 hours a day. They are lucky to receive a dollar a day for there labours. The moment a government in any of these countries try to improve the working conditions of the employees, these multinational giants flee the country, often leaving whole communities facing financial ruin. The corporations are aware that there are plenty of other labour markets that could be exploited with gay abandon.
That is just the human cost. What about the environmental costs? Competition has forced many corporations to "stream line" their operations. Environmental standards are normally the first victims of this "stream line" process. A significant amount of environmental pollution and land degradation has been blamed on industry, yet the factories keep producing more and more. Thousands of items go unsold each year due to competition. Only a fraction of this merchandise is recycled. The rest goes to the already overflowing landfills.
In politics, the detrimental effects of competition are blatant. Politicians often resort to popular yet socially damaging policies to gain votes. These measures include imprudent spending to rabble rousing. The current volatility in Israel and Palestine, the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka, and the famine in Zimbabwe are all, at least partially, problems created by politicians to get elected.
It has been said that education is one sphere where competition has always had a beneficial influence. Even this claim is dubious. Due to competition students are less likely to exchange ideas with one another, thus enriching the student population as whole. Furthermore, competition drives students to study well to pass exams, but not to gain wisdom. Students spend many hours preparing for standardised tests; tests which many believe are inherently flawed. Thus, it is often not the most intellectual student who succeeds, but the most competitive.
Competition is an inborn human trait. It has some positive qualities, but overall, it does far more harm than help to the society. As intelligent beings, humans can transcend their evolutionary weaknesses. Thus, humans should rely less competition and more cooperation for the sake of the society.
新版GRE寫作新題庫：Argument
題目：
The following appeared in a health magazine.
"The citizens of Forsythe have adopted more healthful lifestyles. Their responses to a recent survey show that in their eating habits they conform more closely to government nutritional recommendations than they did ten years ago. Furthermore, there has been a fourfold increase in sales of food products containing kiran, a substance that a scientific study has shown reduces cholesterol. This trend is also evident in reduced sales of sulia, a food that few of the most healthy citizens regularly eat."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
中文翻譯：
Forsythe的居選擇了更健康的生活方式。他們對于最近一項調(diào)查的回答顯示，他們的飲食習(xí)慣比十年前更加貼近政府的營養(yǎng)建議。而且，含有kiran的食品銷量增長了四倍，在一次科學(xué)研究中發(fā)現(xiàn)kiran是一種能夠降低膽固醇水平的物質(zhì)。這種趨勢同樣也被sulia的銷量下降所證實，sulia是那些最健康的居極少經(jīng)常食用的食品
寫一篇回應(yīng)，討論還需要何種具體的證據(jù)才能更好的評估上面的論證，并解釋這個證據(jù)是如何強化/削弱這篇文章的論證的。
新版GRE寫作新題庫：Argument
題目：
The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants.
"Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. Only about 2 percent of customers have complained, indicating that 98 people out of 100 are happy with the change. Furthermore, many servers have reported that a number of customers who ask for butter do not complain when they are given margarine instead. Clearly, either these customers cannot distinguish butter from margarine or they use the term 'butter' to refer to either butter or margarine. Thus, to avoid the expense of purchasing butter and to increase profitability, the Happy Pancake House should extend this cost-saving change to its restaurants in the southeast and northeast as well."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
中文翻譯：
在整個美國西南部的所有Hp餐廳都采用人造黃油替代了天然黃油。只有2%的顧客投訴，這意味著100人中有98人對于這次改變都是愉悅的。另外，很多服務(wù)生報告說很多投訴要天然黃油的顧客在被給了人造黃油以后便沒有了投訴。很明顯，要么是這些顧客無法辨清人造或天然黃油，要么是他們用天然黃油來指代人造或天然黃油。因此，為了避免購買天然黃油的花銷并且提升利潤率，Hp餐廳應(yīng)該將這種節(jié)約開銷的方式推廣到美國東南部以及東北部的所有餐廳。
寫一篇回應(yīng)，在其中討論還有哪些問題需要被回答才能決定文中的推薦是否能得到預(yù)期結(jié)果，并務(wù)請解釋對這些問題的回答是如何幫助更好的評估文中的建議的。
GRE作文寫作詞匯要學(xué)會替換相關(guān)文章：
