新版GREArgument寫作新題庫整合5篇
今天小編為大家準(zhǔn)備了新版GREArgument寫作新題庫，一起來學(xué)習(xí)一下吧，下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。
新版GREArgument寫作新題庫
題目：
Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7,000 years ago, and within 3,000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands had become extinct. Yet humans cannot have been a factor in the species' extinctions, because there is no evidence that the humans had any significant contact with the mammals. Further, archaeologists have discovered numerous sites where the bones of fish had been discarded, but they found no such areas containing the bones of large mammals, so the humans cannot have hunted the mammals. Therefore, some climate change or other environmental factor must have caused the species' extinctions.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
中文翻譯：
大約7000年前人類到達(dá)了Kaliko島，在3000年內(nèi)曾經(jīng)生活在Kaliko島的樹林中的大型哺乳動物絕大多數(shù)已經(jīng)滅絕了。然而人類并不是導(dǎo)致這些物種滅絕的因素，因?yàn)闆]有證據(jù)表明人類與這些哺乳動物有很多接觸。而且，考古學(xué)家發(fā)現(xiàn)一些有大量魚骨被拋棄的場所，而他們并沒有發(fā)現(xiàn)存在大型哺乳動物骨頭的類似場所，因而人類并沒有獵殺這些哺乳動物。因此，一定是一些氣候上的變化或其他環(huán)境因素導(dǎo)致了這些物種的滅絕。
寫一篇回應(yīng)，在其中檢視文章的論證中述及和/或未明確述及的假設(shè)，務(wù)請解釋文章的論證是如何依賴于這些假設(shè)的，并指出如果這些假設(shè)不成立會對文章的論證帶來何種影響。
新版GREArgument寫作新題庫
題目：
The following appeared in a health magazine.
"The citizens of Forsythe have adopted more healthful lifestyles. Their responses to a recent survey show that in their eating habits they conform more closely to government nutritional recommendations than they did ten years ago. Furthermore, there has been a fourfold increase in sales of food products containing kiran, a substance that a scientific study has shown reduces cholesterol. This trend is also evident in reduced sales of sulia, a food that few of the most healthy citizens regularly eat."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
中文翻譯：
Forsythe的居選擇了更健康的生活方式。他們對于最近一項(xiàng)調(diào)查的回答顯示，他們的飲食習(xí)慣比十年前更加貼近政府的營養(yǎng)建議。而且，含有kiran的食品銷量增長了四倍，在一次科學(xué)研究中發(fā)現(xiàn)kiran是一種能夠降低膽固醇水平的物質(zhì)。這種趨勢同樣也被sulia的銷量下降所證實(shí)，sulia是那些最健康的居極少經(jīng)常食用的食品
寫一篇回應(yīng)，討論還需要何種具體的證據(jù)才能更好的評估上面的論證，并解釋這個(gè)證據(jù)是如何強(qiáng)化/削弱這篇文章的論證的。
新版GREArgument寫作新題庫
題目：
The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment building to its manager.
"One month ago, all the showerheads on the first five floors of Sunnyside Towers were modified to restrict the water flow to approximately one-third of its original flow. Although actual readings of water usage before and after the adjustment are not yet available, the change will obviously result in a considerable savings for Sunnyside Corporation, since the corporation must pay for water each month. Except for a few complaints about low water pressure, no problems with showers have been reported since the adjustment. Clearly, restricting water flow throughout all the twenty floors of Sunnyside Towers will increase our profits further."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
中文翻譯：
一個(gè)月前，Sunnyside塔樓最低的五層的所有淋浴噴頭被調(diào)節(jié)成水壓只有以前的大約三分之一。盡管在調(diào)節(jié)之后用水量的確切讀數(shù)還沒有出來，但這種變革顯然將為Sunnyside公司節(jié)省大量的花費(fèi)，因?yàn)楣颈仨毭吭聻樗玫乃顿M(fèi)。除了關(guān)于低水壓的幾起投訴，在調(diào)節(jié)之后沒有發(fā)生關(guān)于淋浴噴頭的問題的報(bào)告。我預(yù)計(jì)在Sunnyside塔樓所有的12層都限制水壓將會增加我們未來的利潤。
寫一篇回應(yīng)，在其中討論還有哪些問題需要被回答才能決定文中的推薦是否能得到預(yù)期結(jié)果，并務(wù)請解釋對這些問題的回答是如何幫助更好的評估文中的建議的。
新版GREArgument寫作新題庫
題目：
The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants.
"Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. Only about 2 percent of customers have complained, indicating that 98 people out of 100 are happy with the change. Furthermore, many servers have reported that a number of customers who ask for butter do not complain when they are given margarine instead. Clearly, either these customers cannot distinguish butter from margarine or they use the term 'butter' to refer to either butter or margarine. Thus, to avoid the expense of purchasing butter and to increase profitability, the Happy Pancake House should extend this cost-saving change to its restaurants in the southeast and northeast as well."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
中文翻譯：
在整個(gè)美國西南部的所有Hp餐廳都采用人造黃油替代了天然黃油。只有2%的顧客投訴，這意味著100人中有98人對于這次改變都是愉悅的。另外，很多服務(wù)生報(bào)告說很多投訴要天然黃油的顧客在被給了人造黃油以后便沒有了投訴。很明顯，要么是這些顧客無法辨清人造或天然黃油，要么是他們用天然黃油來指代人造或天然黃油。因此，為了避免購買天然黃油的花銷并且提升利潤率，Hp餐廳應(yīng)該將這種節(jié)約開銷的方式推廣到美國東南部以及東北部的所有餐廳。
寫一篇回應(yīng)，在其中討論還有哪些問題需要被回答才能決定文中的推薦是否能得到預(yù)期結(jié)果，并務(wù)請解釋對這些問題的回答是如何幫助更好的評估文中的建議的。
新版GREArgument寫作新題庫
題目：
An ancient, traditional remedy for insomnia—the scent of lavender flowers—has now been proved effective. In a recent study, 30 volunteers with chronic insomnia slept each night for three weeks on lavender-scented pillows in a controlled room where their sleep was monitored electronically. During the first week, volunteers continued to take their usual sleeping medication. They slept soundly but wakened feeling tired. At the beginning of the second week, the volunteers discontinued their sleeping medication. During that week, they slept less soundly than the previous week and felt even more tired. During the third week, the volunteers slept longer and more soundly than in the previous two weeks. Therefore, the study proves that lavender cures insomnia within a short period of time.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
中文翻譯：
一種古老的傳統(tǒng)治療失眠的偏方--薰衣草花香，現(xiàn)在被證明是有效的。在一次最近的調(diào)查中，30名患有慢性失眠的志愿者在三周之內(nèi)每晚都在一個(gè)受監(jiān)視的控制室內(nèi)睡在帶薰衣草花香的枕頭上。在第一周，志愿者繼續(xù)服用他們常用的安眠藥。他們睡得很沉但醒來時(shí)很累。在第二周，他們不服用藥物。結(jié)果與前一周相比他們睡得不那么沉并且感覺更累。在第三周，他們睡得比前兩周時(shí)間長而且更深。這表明薰衣草在短時(shí)間內(nèi)治愈了失眠。
寫一篇回應(yīng)，討論還需要何種具體的證據(jù)才能更好的評估上面的論證，并解釋這個(gè)證據(jù)是如何強(qiáng)化/削弱這篇文章的論證的。
新版GREArgument寫作新題庫整合5篇相關(guān)文章：
