GRE寫作2個觀點類常見錯誤講解
在GRE寫作中，根據(jù)文章素材提煉作文觀點的能力對大家的作文得分有很大影響。下面小編就和大家分享GRE寫作2個觀點類常見錯誤實例講解,希望能夠幫助到大家，來欣賞一下吧。
GRE寫作2個觀點類常見錯誤實例講解
GRE寫作觀點類常見錯誤介紹
GRE寫作在提煉觀點時出問題的情況其實很常見，其中最主要的錯誤有兩種，一種是根據(jù)素材提煉出的觀點論點過于寬泛，根本沒有體現(xiàn)出題目的特色，而只是給出了一個很大很空泛的觀點。另外一種則是論點過于狹窄，也就是太過針對題材本身而沒有辦法引申出更多深層次的思考。這兩種錯誤看似互相矛盾，但對于缺乏GRE作文寫作經(jīng)驗的考生來說，無論出現(xiàn)那種錯誤都需要引起警惕，否則作文成績將很難有所提升。
1. 觀點太空太寬
在各類教導寫作的材料中，大家應該時常會發(fā)現(xiàn)關于強調(diào)GRE寫作論點一定要寫得具體，越細越好的指導建議。而考生經(jīng)常出現(xiàn)的問題就是會出現(xiàn)一些很寬泛的論點句，以至于在較短的篇幅里并不能充分展開，甚至有時候會造成觀點重疊。
比如去年2月份的GRE考試中有一篇作文，題目要求探討關于移動電話對于現(xiàn)代人生活的影響。假如考生提煉出的觀點是“Mobile phones have changed our life greatly. ”這句只是說手機很大程度上改變了人們的生活，但是并未點明從哪些方面上帶來了改變，因此把這個觀點具化一下：“Mobile phones can serve as a connection to the Internet, which can be extremely convenient for obtaining information wherever you may be.”這樣一來大家既有具體內(nèi)容可寫，也可以避免觀點過于寬泛大而無當?shù)那闆r。
而同樣是在去年2月份，還有一篇作文的題目則討論了關于廣告泛濫對于社會輿論造成的干擾。如果考生只是簡單寫“Advertising has bad effects on all of society. ”廣告有不良影響顯然是不夠的。我們需要寫出具體的方面，比如“Advertisements which exaggerate the function of the products may mislead the consumers.”這樣具體的觀點才是GRE考官真正希望看到的內(nèi)容，言之有物也需要從實際出發(fā)。
2. 觀點太細太窄
與論點過于寬泛相對的，則是一些考生把論點定得太過狹窄，自己把自己逼近了死胡同以至于沒有展開的空間甚至沒有進一步支持的必要。這類句子與其說是觀點，倒不如說是事實的陳述或者只是舉了個例子而已。
去年4月GRE作文中曾出現(xiàn)過這樣一道題目，講的是某個地方當?shù)厝碎_展旅游業(yè)的看法。有的考生直接把觀點寫成“There are more local residents engaged in tourism industry. ”這其實并非觀點，只是陳述了一個事實就是在當?shù)卦絹碓蕉嗳碎_始從事旅游業(yè)，可改為：“Tourism brings huge economic benefits to local residents.”就比較容易展開了。
而今年1月份的GRE作文中也有一道討論不可再生燃料如何持續(xù)利用的題目，如果考生寫出“The consumption of fossil fuels increase in recent years. ”這樣一句看似結(jié)論的話既缺乏數(shù)據(jù)支持也毫無說服力可言，等于是自己把話說死了，后續(xù)要怎么展開?正確寫法是給出論述重點，假設原因，比如“The consumption of fossil fuels increasing in recent years results from two factors.”之后就會好寫很多。
GRE作文范文：新創(chuàng)意
Truly innovative ideas do not arise from groups of people, but from individuals.When groups try to be creative, the members force each other to compromise and, as a result, creative ideas tend to be weakened and made more conventional. Most original ideas arise from individuals working alone.
GRE作文范文參考：
I agree with the speaker on that truly innovative ideas arise from individuals.Nevertheless, it is unfair to claim unilaterally that the groups tend to weaken creative ideas without thinking of their positive effects on the ideas; it is equally important for groups to examine, modify, or even reject the ideas.
First of all, truly innovative ideas are destined to arise from individuals in that inter-personal thinking process is so far impossible. This is to say, when we sit still and have a cluster of phenomena, theories, statistics and so forth of a certain issue in our mind, we are thinking it over yet with no assistance at all. After all it is impossible for one to intrude into other's mind. Following this principle, innovative ideas spark off during the process of meditation, and they are the produced by one's own effort. It is equally possible, however, for people to be inspired by each other, yet this is by no means assistance in thinking. Clues, hints, inspirations are to remind people of things ignored or taken for granted, but have nothing to do with the process of thinking, that is, to sort out the whole vision and draw conclusion. In one word, innovative ideas arise from meditation, which is solely limited within one body, one brain. Therefore innovative ideas are always the product of individual's work.
Nevertheless, it does not suggest that innovative ideas then have nothing to do with group work, and actually it is just the opposite. When a novel thought is brought up, it is of great importance to fully evaluate its validity, feasibility, and consequences if carried out. This point need no further illustration if we think of a father who resolutely stops his 6-year-old son from playing matches. The kid might have intended to try something new, driven by an innovative idea, yet the whole house might have caught fire also since the boy is incapable of dealing with accidents. This is the same case in academic fields. In a chemistry lab for example, a novel route design of synthesizing a new compound is never carried out without further evaluation. Practical conditions such as equipments, reagents, and economic efficiency, namely yield per cost, are always taken into consideration and sometimes restrict the application of those ideas.
This is to say, innovation is usually good but not always practicable. This claim is fully demonstrated in the political field. Governors of all levels must take holistic views of the situation and make balanced decision in order to avoid mistakes; innovative ideas alone cannot justify their practicability and goodwill to others. For instance, when we look back, the development of plastic industry has resulted in great loss in the global ecosystem. Thus we see the disastrous consequences of carrying out such innovative yet premature ideas.
Hence, it is necessary for the groups to assess, remedy, and conclude the value and use of innovative ideas. All innovative ideas should be brought to discussions. With the clash of skeptical attitude of others to the advocating behavior of the thinker, fallacies made in a haste can be easily found and eliminated, which rectifies, sometimes supplements the idea. I don't agree with the speaker on his/her judgment of group work as compromising, weakening and conventionalizing innovation. Group work promotes those justified and useful innovative ideas and rejects those invalid, sometimes dangerous ones, as we see the case between father and son, in a chemistry lab, in all nations around the world. Only after the group censorship can the innovative ideas be carried out and benefit people, and this is the time when its innovativeness is fully appreciated.
In conclusion, I concede that most original ideas arise from individuals, yet I believe the group effort on these ideas should never be downplayed. It is the group that judge,reject or develop these ideas; this process is equally important with the innovative thinking.
GRE作文范文：成功
Success, whether academic or professional, involves an ability to survive in a new environment and, eventually, to change it.
GRE作文范文參考：
Many wonder the intrinsic impact of industrial revolution over the last century. Is it a blessing or a curse? Ever since the invention of steam engine, mass production enabled factories to make out products in a madly efficient manner, while machines also supplanted innumerous traditionally skilled artisan, forcing them out of work. Gone are the days when they boasted of their craftsmanship that they assumed to be able support their family all their life. Consumers became more aspiring to novel design instead of durability as goods were made to be discarded.
Hundreds years later, with the first installation of integrated circuit on the chip, another profound turnover took place. Now the computer pervades our life so much that one may find himself half illiterate in absence of input skill. This time, thousands of jobs were created in Silicon Valley, transforming some of the few into billionaire over one night. Nevertheless, the original inventor might not expect that the ensuing slow down and thus recession in IT sector would approach so soon in less than 10 years, which is obviously less than a presumable 15 years time normal for a periodical change.Positive or negative, one mark that characterizes the technological bombardment indicates a constant fact: changes exist ubiquitously and operating at an ever-increasing tempo; those who fail to catch up with the torrent of change would ineluctably engulfed by billows, floating no where and eventually dissolve as negligible bubbles.
Favors as well as opportunities goes to who adapt to the contemporary trend. Fully recognizing this axiom, long before the scientists announced accomplishment of sketches of human genes or earlier successful cloning of Doris, candidates preparing for university admission have smelt the sense. Today, in the U.S., biology and its branch disciplines become the first choice for top students of senior high, determining that this subject, foretold as the third wave in technology, could bring them brilliant future as “Bill Gates” dreamt the same in the previous wave.
In addition to academic realm, respect would be paid to people who though deprived of their past secure professions, choose not to be a loser in the whimsical society. Like the artisans who lost jobs, a vast number of skilled laborer in China’s city of Wengzhou have undergone darkness and depression in those old days. However, after years of endeavor and refinement, they prove their value again. By accurately posit the economic trend and market demand, they play an active role in almost all economic sectors, garments, catering and lodging, hi-tech industry, you name it.
While ability honed in surviving the fickleness of the world makes the path through success shorter, it is essential for the more ambitious to acquire the pith of reformist and lead the trend. In this way, it could help him distinguish from the mediocracy and platitude. This is absolutely not an easy task. Inborn insight and foresight are needed to tell uncommon out of the commonplace; extraordinary perseverance and encouragement is a must to face the coming challenges against his iconoclasm. Very few people crowned with triumph possess this quality, whether the Nobel Prize winner or those who makes coverage on the Times.
In sum, as shown in the course of history, success, whether academic or professional,involves an ability to surviving in a new environment and---, eventually, ---to change it.Now some elite persons have again forecast that another social change is impending.Are you ready for that?
GRE寫作2個觀點類常見錯誤講解相關文章：
