GRE寫作開頭結(jié)尾各段落實(shí)用模板句式
雖然GRE考試的寫作題庫公開，考試題目從中隨機(jī)抽取，但這看似開卷考試的形式卻一點(diǎn)都不簡單。題量大，時(shí)間緊，考生根本無法一題題地去準(zhǔn)備。下面小編就和大家分享GRE寫作開頭結(jié)尾各段落實(shí)用模板句式素材,希望能夠幫助到大家，來欣賞一下吧。
GRE寫作開頭結(jié)尾各段落實(shí)用模板句式素材分享
新GRE考試經(jīng)典寫作模板匯總：開頭
In the argument, the …(主題對象) recommends that …(對結(jié)論做論述，基本上可以抄原文，用另外一種方式表達(dá)即可). To support this recommendation the argument point out that …(說明文章用了什么論據(jù)去證明觀點(diǎn)了，同上抄襲即可) however …This argument is logically flawed in several critical respects (說明這篇文章邏輯上是有缺陷的).
新GRE考試經(jīng)典寫作模板匯總：攻擊論據(jù)
1. 調(diào)查結(jié)果沒有證據(jù)申明
To begin with, the argument depends on the assumption that… (闡述說出了一個(gè)沒有根據(jù)的申明，并說出文中的原因) —rather than for some other reasons. Yet it is entirely possible that… (說明這種猜測可能的原因) or some other factor. Without ruling out all other reasons why… (重述這個(gè)申明)…(說出反方向的結(jié)論).
2. 提到了樣本，但是數(shù)據(jù)不具有代表性(數(shù)據(jù)不夠)
Firstly, the author provides no evidence that the survey is statistically reliable. Perhaps the survey’s sample is not sufficient in size or representative of the quality of …(說明對象的數(shù)量和質(zhì)量不夠) For that matter, this survey is not strong enough to establish causation between… (在這里列出原因和結(jié)果，做比較) However, the other reasons of the survey which (敘述其他原因下的情況). As a result, without the evidence that the survey is statistically reliable the author cannot justifiably draw any conclusion by relying on this survey.
3. 猜測，但是沒有證據(jù)
Thirdly, the argument assumes that… (闡述文中的猜測) However, the letter provides no evidence to substantiate this assumption. In fact, the letter suggests that this might be the case. By admitting that …, the letter implies that …說明影響他們happy的因素還有其他的方面，不光是研究中所列舉。
新GRE考試經(jīng)典寫作模板匯總：攻擊論證過程
1. 時(shí)間上的錯(cuò)誤類比
To begin with,…(陳述某個(gè)數(shù)據(jù)) may not a reliable date of that rate would be now(和現(xiàn)在相比較是不可信的). Perhaps the… (反例), For that matter, perhaps …(說出反例的情況下會導(dǎo)致何種結(jié)果). In short, without ruling out other possible reasons for …(假設(shè)說出針對反例應(yīng)該怎么做)the memo’s author cannot convince me on the basis of …(說出應(yīng)該有的結(jié)論)
2.錯(cuò)誤的因果關(guān)系
3. 兩個(gè)事實(shí)錯(cuò)誤的類比
Even if…(讓步，即使某個(gè)條件成立) the argument unfairly assumes that…(說明錯(cuò)誤的類比的情況). It is entirely possible that the …(比較對象) own different situations. Perhaps …(具體說出反例) Without accounting for such differences between the two places is unreliable.
4. 錯(cuò)誤的推論
Even if …(讓步，即使某個(gè)條件成立)the argument relied on the future assumption that …(說出要讓步的是事實(shí)). Yet the only evidence the argument offer to substantiate this assumption (說出文中的根據(jù)). Perhaps …(說出有可能出現(xiàn)的其他情況導(dǎo)致這個(gè)事實(shí))if so, (說出不一樣的結(jié)果，與上面事實(shí)相矛盾). Or…(其他的情況) In short, without more information about…(對上面的可能情況總結(jié)) were established it is impossible to assess …(回到上面的結(jié)論).
新GRE考試經(jīng)典寫作模板匯總：結(jié)論的攻擊
1. 說明結(jié)論不完美，可以有其他的方法
Finally, the argument fails to consider …(有更好的辦法實(shí)現(xiàn)目標(biāo)). Perhaps by…(辦法一), or by (辦法二), (對目標(biāo)進(jìn)行展望) In short, without weighing the suggestion against alternatives, it is unconvincing that (說明提供的方案不好).
2. 贏利
Finally, even if the families support to build the new seafood restaurant, the restaurant would not necessarily be profitable as a result. Profitability is a function of both revenue and expense. Thus, it is quite possible that the restaurant’s costs of obtaining high-quality and healthy seafood or of new promoting restaurant might render it unprofitable despite its popularity. Without weighing revenue against expenses the argument’s conclusion is premature at best.
新GRE考試經(jīng)典寫作模板匯總：結(jié)尾段
In sum, the argument seems logical, but is based on nothing more than pure speculation and perhaps wishful thinking, yet lack of some warranted investigation. To strength it, the author needs to evaluate all possible alternatives and provide detail and comprehensive evidence before jumping to the conclusion that …(文中的結(jié)論)
GRE作文范文：事物不會一成不變
Much of the information that people assume is‘factual’actually turns out to be inaccurate. Thus，any piece of information referred to as a‘fact’should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future.
GRE作文范文參考：
Should we be doubtful to all the information at hands because the rightness of which is uncertain? The speaker claims so，I concede that people often commit various fallacies in the course of cognizing things，however I fundamentally take exception of the arguer's assertion to mistrust every fact we might encounter. And I will substantially discuss my views thereinafter.
To begin with，the speaker seems to implicate that a fact would be proven false in the future under numerous circumstance. Nevertheless I prefer to arguer that facts never change. No matter how did the Medieval Church and Inquisition persecute Bruno，the fact never changes that the earth is far from being the center of the universe as the religious sovereigns had assumed or hoped for，while just a minor particle in it. Equally，no matter how Edison had tried to incite the public fear and distrust to the alternative current electricity，the fact never changes that Teals’ electrical system is vastly superior to his direct current electrical one，and would be accepted and applied in larger range.
However，what do change are the human's objective interpretations to facts. One compelling argument to this point is that，due to the limitation of human’s knowledge and comprehensive capability，they tend to make insufficient or even false understanding to the certain fact. An apt illustration is the changes of cognition to disease. While at the ancient time，our progenitors believed the a man becoming a patient for the reason that he had conduct crimes or offended some ghosts or spirits，the contemporary people have well know that the varies of pathogens are the basic causes to our diseases，and the defects of our immune system and so forth are also the factors as well. Another argument for the change of comprehension to fact is that different people always observe and interpret from different perspectives. Though the Relativity theory is not well compliable with the Quantum mechanism，no one call the greatness of both Einstein and Bohr，because their theories are based on distinct views，the former from the macrocosm and the later from the microcosm.
Notwithstanding the foregoing reasons for that human tend to make fallacies during the cause of comprehending and cognizing facts，these reasons should never be the excuses to doubt every conclusion we might draw from facts. Based on certain rational inference and proper knowledge fundament，the conclusions we make might well be justifiable，if not completely right，to certain degree. What we need to do is to promote the enterprise of pursuing the better answer and try to use the result we have get to application，instead of wasting our time to undue doubt and suspicion. Though the medical scientists have not fully understood the mechanism of how the does the implanted organ interact with the wounded body，they are not refrain from using the implanting skill to save patients，of course the precondition or which is that this technology is much well established than the fundamental theory.
To sum up，while I advocate the speaker's opinion that it is inevitable for human to comprehend facts inaccurately，for the reason of the limitation of the abilities，I essentially disagree with his assertion that facts will continually alter themselves，as well as his recommendation to discredit any piece of fact. In the final analysis，I would arguer once more that facts never change and although the misunderstanding to them is inevitable，we should not defer ourselves from the pursuit to fully comprehending them.
GRE作文范文：如何避免偏激
Most people often look for similarities, even between very different things, and even when it it is unhelpful or harmful to do so. Instead, a thing should be considered on its own terms: we should avoid the tendency to compare it to something else.
GRE作文范文參考：
In the age of accelerating changes, the eagerness to understand things in an effective and equally efficient way is more than ever. Although all kinds of complex techniques, skills and equipments helpful for understanding and studying the objects are easily accessible to people, the basic strategies stay the same as before: one is starting from similarities and the other from distinction. From my personal point of view, only by using the two in proper proportion and order can one achieve his/her goal to understand a thing.
Looking for similarities is a proper starting point. When we first meet something new,we need to clarify its basic attributes, finding similarites with other familiar things and classify it according to those attributes. Classification according to similaties is of great assistance to provide us with an outline, basic knowledge which we can base further investigation upon. Although things in contemporary age represent themselves in various forms and styles, similarities exist in any pair as long as certain perspective can be found. For instance, Bookcase and window are so different that at first glance, one
may not be able to find the similarities, or even such an effort seems to be meaningless. Yet, they are both part of a house, something that must be taken into consideration when decorating or refurnishing the house. Such a comparison would be helpful for us to realize that “buy” and “sell” are two basic operation we can have upon window even though we have no idea what window is made of, how it is produced or what its function is.What’s more, looking for similarities not only refer to the object itself, but the relationship with others. Similar relationships helps people understand things in groups or pairs using the strategy: analogy. Analogy is especially useful when the charactertistics of a relationship rather than the objects themselves are the focus of understanding and when similar relationships are known and objects unknown. For example, if told that the relationship between window and ASVE is similar to that between book and read, one can safely guess that ASVE is the operation people can take on window although ASVE stays an unknown action.
Definitely, mere similarity usually exclude the distinctive characteristics of a thing. We need to investigate its own terms for deeper understanding. Within the rough outline sketched by similarity, a more detailed and well-articulated picture can be drawn by grasping own terms of a thing. Still take window as an example. From careful observation, we know that it is transparent, it consists of different chemical materials, it performs the function as to protect privacy, to preserve desirable temperature indoor, and sometimes to prevent rains and snows from going inside. Deeper and further understanding of window can only be gained when we take its own terms besides those it shares with bookcase into consideration.
In the newly development software engineering model named Object-oriented model,the strategy “similarity first and differences later” functions as the core and focus of the whole model. Objects sharing common points are put into same “classes” and common points are processed together, later they are defined, discussed and processed respectively according to their own characteristics. This method greatly reduces the repetive time and energy spent over and over again on similar, if not utterly same, terms. Translated into daily life, starting from similarites for a quick outline and transferring to grasp distinctive characteristics for deeper understanding isthe approach we should always bear in mind when hoping to understand a thing with effectiveness and efficiency.
GRE寫作開頭結(jié)尾各段落實(shí)用模板句式相關(guān)文章：
★ 2019中考作文素材:中考作文開頭結(jié)尾萬能句,優(yōu)美段落
上一篇：GRE寫作提分技巧匯總介紹
下一篇：GRE寫作用模板如何提分
