GRE寫作詞匯提升秘笈

對于參加gre寫作的小伙伴來說,GRE寫作詞匯提升是一件很重要的事情?下面小編就和大家分享GRE寫作詞匯提升秘笈　,希望能夠幫助到大家，快來學習一下吧。

GRE寫作詞匯提升秘笈

“聯(lián)想”一詞的方向是不同的。

receptive knowledge的形成取決與在知道一個單詞的“長相”的情況下，回憶起單詞的“意思”。而productive knowledge則需要訓練知道一個意思，找一個具有“合適長相”的單詞來表述這個意思。通常情況下，我們在背單詞的時候喜歡通過詞形去回想詞義，因為英語中同義詞近義詞現(xiàn)象比較嚴重。

gre寫作方法如果要更好的使用高級詞匯進行寫作，我們需要進行反向的練習。進行關(guān)于可以表達一個意思的單詞的brainstorming，比如，你可以想一想，可以用來表達“矛盾”的英文詞有哪些?這些詞該怎么用?

2. productive詞匯

即寫作詞匯，在你的記憶中是和其他很多常用的關(guān)聯(lián)詞匯有豐富的聯(lián)系的，很多單詞在你的腦海里都是以這種方式存在的，即language network。當你在寫句子的時候，如果你寫到這些有關(guān)聯(lián)的詞匯的話，這些詞匯本身會想起更多的寫作詞匯。

一個簡單的例子就是，有些時候，我們可能發(fā)現(xiàn)自己一直在說費話，但是說話的內(nèi)容我們自己都不知道。這就是因為這種language network的存在你在語言中的用詞。

如何提高GRE寫作中的詞匯量:如何訓練寫作中的詞匯量

1.經(jīng)常brainstorm可以表達一個特定意思的單詞，找盡可能多的單詞。

gre寫作方法此外，我還會列出一個以中文意思為索引的英文同義詞列表，并反復回憶那些可能被用來通過中文意思表達意思的英文單詞。

2.進行meaning negotiation practice

如果你還沒有掌握一個單詞，你可以進行meaning negotiation practice。在學習一個單詞的時候，找很多這個單詞的例句，通過例句不斷猜測單詞的意思，直到你找到了一個可以在所有的例句中都解釋的通的意思，然后再去看答案。這種方式會促使你更加注意一個詞匯的context和collocation，更加有助于你對于一個單詞的language network的形成。

3.背誦單詞，抄寫句子

gre寫作怎么練對于你已經(jīng)學過的單詞，如果你想回去把它訓練成一個你可以在寫作中很容易使用的單詞，你可以背誦單詞的例子，例句，模仿寫作等學習方法。

最后，多讀多寫

要掌握寫作的單詞，你必須盡可能多地讀和寫。尤其是在寫作中，刻意模仿別人使用高級詞匯的例子，最后形成自己的寫作風格。

提升GRE寫作水平的六個必須

1.必須研究范文。所謂范文就是諸多專家學者總結(jié)出來的重要輔導材料，都是針對考題進行的華麗答論，因此，對于范文，小伙伴們要做的就是不僅能熟記于心，更要對范文進行逐詞逐句的分析，分析文章的邏輯順序，詞語的選擇，以及文章的修辭，這些都是不可多得的財富。

2.必須要有自己的模板。針對考試，很多小伙伴會因為緊張造成大腦的短路，反而平時常練習的一些詞語或者邏輯都會消失，這就要求小伙伴們在平時總結(jié)出不同的模板，多加記憶，就算到時候考場緊張，大腦也會條件性的反射出一些具有條例的句子，為自己的作文增光添彩。

3.必須多整改。一旦一篇作文出爐，不能將之束之高閣，要多進行修改，查漏補缺，隨時尋找自己文章中的不足，經(jīng)過反復的修改，才能提高自己的寫作水平和創(chuàng)作水平。

4.必須多思考。有思考的人生才是充實的，作文也如此，當我們看的別人優(yōu)秀的著作時，首先要學習，其次呢，要進行對比，看別人的角度為什么比自己的貼切，從而提升自己看問題的角度。三人行必有我?guī)?，要不斷的去學習，多思考，充實自己的大腦，為自己的創(chuàng)作提供素材。

5.必須熟悉題庫。題庫中對每一篇文章都進行了邏輯分析，熟記每道題的邏輯分析，會使你節(jié)省大部分的時間，去合理安排自己的作文創(chuàng)作，不要在考試過程中再去分體題目的邏輯，這樣會極大地減少你寫作的時間。

6.必須善于學習。大家的意見和討論，有時候可能突然會打通你對一件事的看法，很多時候大家的討論，對于你來說就說很多不同的角度，多學習對自己有益無害。

這幾個必須是針對GRE作文日常學習以及提升的小竅門，進過對GRE范文的理解和背誦，結(jié)合別人的優(yōu)秀著作，別人的多方討論，整理成自己的模版，這樣在日后的考試中，就能吃得一顆定心丸，交出自己滿意的答卷。

GRE作文題庫之談“成功”

題目：

In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any woman or man as a hero. The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.

在今天這個媒體鋪天蓋地的社會中，人們已經(jīng)很難把任何人當作英雄了。任何人只要是淪為媒體的話題，那么他注定會名聲掃地。

正文：

Too often we hear people say that with the ever-increasingly intensive media coverage,no public figure would safely pass the scrutiny of this mass media campaign and eventually subject to the downfall of their reputation as public heroes. I agree that this phenomenon is abundant in the modern society; however, the speaker goes too far in claiming that no woman or man could secure his or her place as heroes.

Admittedly, the mass media has a role in the demystification of a person that were once regarded as a paragon and model of the society he lives in. it is understandable mainly for two reasons. For one thing, the mass media industry’s prosperity owns much to their detailing recording and description of people’s idols. After all, the executive understand that nothing could be more appealing and eye-catching than observing that a public figure making mistakes and thus being banished from the adoring shrines built by public. Consider Nixon’s Water Gate Scandal, Bill Clinton’s sex scandal, and Kennedy’s ex-marital scandal, each of which become the hottest topic being reported on the media coverage. If it were not for the mass media scrutiny, we would expect that people still regard them as the national hero as ever before since as public servant of a country, a politician’s personal moral equates in importance to that of the public moral. The second for the occurrence of this phenomenon is closely related with the psychology of the public. People enjoy the pleasure of seeing famous people do the same stupid thing as they do since it is the nature of human beings to be jealous of the success of others. What is more, some people take the flawless nature of a hero for granted because they consider that as the symbol of a nation, the duty of a hero is to withstand scrutiny from all aspects.

Finishing analyzing why the media scrutiny is so rampant today and how they contribute to the demystification of public heroes, I insist that although heroes are more subject to scrutiny today than the previous century, it is too presumptuous to assert that it is impossible to regard any woman or man as heroes. Everyone has his foibles and to regard those foibles as the yardstick to judge a person may prove to be unfair. The result is deleterious, our society has no people to pay admire, to draw inspiration from. Additionally, even if the psychology of public is critical with who would stand with their scrutiny and secure a place as public models, they learn that heroes are just ordinary people like us and to fully appreciate them requires an unbiased perspective from all sides of their life. Clinton is considered to misuse his power in deceiving public about his wrongdoing as well as his undisciplined behavior.

However, he is still the model of presidents in American history who play an important role in drawing American economy to the right track and tackling many problems rooted in the American society. I pessimistically argue that heroes will always there to be our models and under strict scrutiny, we would more easily observe the true self under the glorious appearance.

What is more, we should observe a strange phenomenon in today’s media industry that is on one hand, they create many heroes and on the other hand they downplay a lot of heroes. We observe too often that a singer may regarded as national hero since he won the favor of fangs all over the world, or a athlete as a hero for the sake that he won the Olympic games, or a entrepreneur as a hero with regard to the economic contribution he devote to the country. These phenomenon aptly informs us that media scrutiny is not always the objective and precise way of examining the qualification of a hero and we would not rely on them to make judgment. Thus it is no sensible to declare that the media will hold the power of diminishing heroes since the claim downplay the rational thinking by modern people.

To sum up, I concede with speaker insofar as the mass media scrutiny power exerted by modern media industry. However, the speaker goes too far to claim the result would be the diminishing of any woman or man heroes, which I am strongly against.This conclusion misconstrues the role placed on media as well as underestimating the critical analyzing ability of modern people.

GRE寫作詞匯提升秘笈相關(guān)文章：

★ 英語學習