2020gre寫作方法詳解
如何練習(xí)GRE寫作?GRE寫作有哪些方式?下面小編就和大家分享gre寫作方法詳解,希望能夠幫助到大家，快來學(xué)習(xí)一下吧。
gre寫作方法詳解
1。GRE寫作考試有練習(xí)題：
為了達(dá)到公平，在考試中公布所有的寫作試題，以達(dá)到能力和本土。
演講者互相競爭?？忌鷳?yīng)在考試前預(yù)習(xí)所有試題(節(jié)省考試時間)，通過撰寫100-150篇大綱了解GRE寫作的總體結(jié)構(gòu)，通過撰寫30-50篇文章練習(xí)寫作思路和表達(dá)方式。練習(xí)題里的試題越熟練，考試就越好。
2。GRE寫作考試以計件方式進(jìn)行評估：
每個評論員都很快地評論你的文章。不可能把每一個細(xì)節(jié)都看得很仔細(xì)?？忌祥喚砣说拈喚硭季S，用最規(guī)范的結(jié)構(gòu)和最清晰的表達(dá)方式來反映自己的思維：第一段要明確提出自己的觀點(diǎn)，第二段要開放，每段的開頭應(yīng)該是該段的主題句。
三。GRE寫作得分是整體得分：
首先，根據(jù)公布的各評分部分的評分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，評分主要集中在以下三個方面：1)邏輯分析能力(洞察力要求);2)條理清晰的要求;3)語言能力(標(biāo)準(zhǔn)書面英語;簡明要求;可變結(jié)構(gòu)要求)。
但也強(qiáng)調(diào)，評級是整體性的，而不是從各個角度分別打分。這表明，雖然中國考生的語言能力很弱，但他們可以得到6分，,gre寫作方法,gre寫作怎么練只要他們能給評論者留下深刻印象的其他兩個角度。因此，當(dāng)我們在短期內(nèi)盡最大努力提高語言能力(語言能力的培養(yǎng)不能在一兩天內(nèi)完成)時，我們應(yīng)該在復(fù)習(xí)時盡可能深入地分析這個話題。學(xué)習(xí)高分作文的結(jié)構(gòu)，通過這兩方面的突破，迅速提高作文的總分。
4。GRE寫作的兩部分在總分中的權(quán)重相同：
由于aa的寫作不涉及自身觀點(diǎn)的發(fā)展，只需要指出作者的邏輯漏洞，因此經(jīng)過訓(xùn)練后寫作并不困難;而ai的寫作需要發(fā)展自己的思想，不僅需要邏輯洞察力的能力，同時也具備一定的論證能力和語言組織能力。中國考生很難在短時間內(nèi)提高。但是，這兩部分在總分中的權(quán)重是一樣的，所以考生的策略應(yīng)該是盡量提高人工智能部分的寫作能力，盡量保持人工智能部分的滿分(或高分)。
因?yàn)槿绻鸄A部分滿分，AI部分只需爭取4分以上，就能保證作文總分在5分以上。其次，評分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和作文評分的計算參照了過度評價模型。我們可以很容易地發(fā)現(xiàn)，評分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中的問題和論點(diǎn)都有共同點(diǎn)：第一，觀點(diǎn)要深刻，論證要有說服力;第二，組織要有條理，表達(dá)要清晰準(zhǔn)確;第三、語言要流利;句型復(fù)雜，詞匯豐富。這三者分別是關(guān)于文本的“思想性”、“結(jié)構(gòu)性”和“表現(xiàn)性”。大多數(shù)高分考生在這三個方面表現(xiàn)都很好。從這里入手，采用“各個擊破”的方法，剖析GRE作文的精髓，從而得到一個理想的分?jǐn)?shù)，這是很自然的。
如何練習(xí)GRE寫作
瘋狂的作家一開始總是不理智的，特別是當(dāng)他們寫第一期和第一次辯論的時候。aw的真正提高是在寫作的過程中，但在這之前一定要讀一定數(shù)量的書。
我個人的觀點(diǎn)是，在積累一定量后，我可以寫幾篇文章，找出最弱的部分，最需要從文章中加強(qiáng)部分，然后找到解決的辦法。在最近一個月左右的時間里，我將進(jìn)行一次模型考試培訓(xùn)。在熟悉GRE作文練習(xí)題和模型文本和作文要求后，我可以試著寫一篇，然后找出差距。語言和例子如下：最好是積累之前，但如果積累不夠，你也可以先寫一篇文章，然后比較。
GRE issue寫作優(yōu)秀實(shí)例：實(shí)用的意義
題目：
Practicality is now our great idol, which all powers and talents must serve.Anything that is not obviously practical has little value in today's world.
正文：
In today’s society idealism seems to become an ideology that is marginalized and practicality is our great idol, thus, the speaker asserts that anything that is not practical bears little value. I admit that being practical is the wide-accepted dogma in order to survive in this world, but by going too far to claim that anything that is not practical has little value is against the empirical observation as well as the general stimulus that push the human society forward.
Admittedly, practicality has become a cult in today’s society. Too often do we hear people talk about being practical whenever they come to make important decisions or choose between several alternatives. The deep-rooted cause underlying this phenomenon is that with the development of modern society, the emphasis is placed more on financial gaining, quick fame, sensible choice and so forth. Our society is rather stable compared with that of the last century when war, violence, human right movements has become the symbol of that period. People are enjoying this peaceful environment with less crucial missions rested upon them and as a result, they shift from idealism to struggle for the common well being of mankind to the practical concept of individual achievement.
This ideology has its merits since after all the disaster and upheaval that our human race has undergone, it is judicious to focus on the economic aspect of things in order to tackle the most important social problems such as poverty, hunger and environmental problems which all deserve us to sit down and work out practical solutions. On the personal level, being practical is how a person would possibly succeed in his career or personal life. One is likely to make sensible decisions for his education and job choice on the basis of practical consideration of his own strength and weakness and careful analysis of the prospect of research direction and job market. Even those in power and intellects need to consider practically since hasty decision built upon pure ideal meditation would hardly find its way in the modern society and is doom to failure.
Agreeing with the speaker that practicality has become the great idol in our society, I am strongly against his point that anything that is not practical has little value. Even in today’s society, idealism is by no means relegated to the place of total neglect and disregard. For one thing, in history, so much achievement is the outcome of several generations’ struggle such as fighting for equality for women, human rights movement,etc. In today’s society, practicality is the way we can obtain our goal but idealism offers the philosophical explanation of why we should set this as our goal and the clear the ultimate value of our pursuing. What is more, by totally fixed one's eyes upon the practical aspect of things, we face the danger of neglecting one important part of our pursuit, that is the mental enjoyment brought out by idealism. If we have a clear goal set in mind and put practical endeavor at the same time, the result would be more satisfactory and valuable.
To sum up, I agree with the speaker insofar as the wide acceptance of practicality is considered. Being practical is the tenet of modern society and it does shed light on the wise way of doing things and obtaining goals, no matter in the personal or social level.But the speaker goes too far by claiming that it is the only valuable ideology in society.I am strongly against this idea since in history or at present, we human beings still need the philosophical explanation to clear our goal and to provide motivation. In this aspect, idealism would never be replaced with pure practical consideration. Otherwise,human society will be replete with insensible people directed by economic profit and quick fame and recognition.
GRE issue寫作優(yōu)秀實(shí)例：丑聞
題目：
Scandals-whether in politics, academia, or other areas-can be useful.They focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
丑聞――無論是政治、學(xué)術(shù)還是其他領(lǐng)域――可能會是有用的。丑聞可以用演說家或者改革家無法使用的手段讓我們注意到某些問題。
正文：
Scandals occur in nearly every field that human set foot in, both revealed and incubative.Once people recognize that the person they adored yesterday is actually a liar by the exposednesses of his scandal, the first reaction may be anger, sorrow and depression.However, if rational rethinking and remediation have been taken after the reports of scandals, actually greater progresses can always be achieved compared with the efforts made by the daily boring speeches made by speakers and reformers.
Scandals can clearly show us the hidden unreasonable and unjust regulations, therefore administers or the public can adjust or even correct those errors. After the Watergate Event, not only President Nixon lost his job, but further influence was conducted by the public and medium. They realized that the problem of the abuse of power which was neglected in the past. As a result, a closer scrutiny upon the high officials of government prevents them from abusing their power any longer. Recently, the filthy relationship between Juventus Club and several references was publicized by medium, which shocked the football circle by those large holes in the institutions of football league and thus forced the Italia Football Association to take actions towards Juventus, references and the ill institutions. While Juventus has been deprived the former championship, a series of more appropriate regulations have at last been added into the football systems. There is no denying that those scandals indeed prohibit the daily operations and developments of certain fields to some extent, but these deleterious effects can be temporary, if proper measures have been done immediately. In this case, scandals may become stimulations that can provoke the awareness of the emergency of the scandals, which is necessary for establishment of an ultimate solutions to the present problems.
Furthermore, compared with the accomplishments endowed by the professional speakers and reformers, the progresses made by the aftereffects of scandals are often more significant and fast. A scandal maker usually has his position in high status, which grants him power great enough to make his underground and illegal behavior so harmful and astonishing that it can be called a scandal. Before their scandals have been known to the public, they are generally admired and trusted by their superiors and inferiors, as well as the medium and public. Therefore, it is difficult or even impossible for speakers and reformers to win the battle against those scandal makers and their inequitable laws or regulations without the support of anyone. No one believes or even pays attention on whatever the speakers and reformers assert, if the scandal makers are trying to cover up those events by their power and trust they gained at the same time. Consequently those errors remain forever. Once the secrets of the scandal makers give away, however, their aura fades, legends evaporate, so does the trust and power endued. Under such circumstances that all sides feel unsatisfied and disappointed, it is much easier for reformers to draw the focus on their ameliorative allegations towards the long existed problems, and thus, the improvements can be made. Perhaps it may be strange to accept the ironic conclusion that scandals do play a more vital role in healing the morbid system of a certain realm than those reformers do sometimes, but oftentimes it is scandal that helps the reformers a lot to strike their targets, which leads to a future primary achievements for society.
Despite the forgoing contributions of scandals, they are not without its apparent problems. Hypersensitive worries may lead serious disorders or even disasters. A threshold trouble is about the excessive revealment of privacies of the officials, stars, or other persons who were doubted to have scandals. This was often done by some so-called responsible mediums in the name of observation the social problems. As a result, the bothered officials or the stars can hardly utilize their full abilities to fulfill their tasks or jobs. Just to meet the curiosity of the public so that they can bolster their sales and profits, these mediums' detective behaviors will inevitably bring about disorders to those who in charge in some areas. Secondly, overstatements of the grave effects of scandals may shadow the contributions of the scandal makers unfairly. Although Clinton was accused by his rose event, his dedication towards the resuscitation and prosperity of America's economy during his term of office cannot be denied. If his fault was overemphasized present, he may have to resign immediately, and his economic ability can no longer serve the society,which is an obvious loss of the society.
To be just, I acknowledge that most people hate to witness scandals happening around them. What is more, recessions and the private violations always come along with scandals.Nevertheless, seeing from another angle, if the scandals are in fact ineluctable, it may be wiser to bravely face with the extant problems. We should find them out and then correct them rather than simply denying their existence.
2020gre寫作方法詳解相關(guān)文章：
2020gre寫作方法詳解
