GRE寫作提升詞匯語法也是重要步驟
GRE寫作對邏輯思路極為看重，大家的復(fù)習(xí)重點(diǎn)也往往集中在論述的邏輯合理性和思路方面，而對于詞匯語法卻甚少關(guān)心。今天小編給大家?guī)砹薌RE寫作提升詞匯語法也是重要步驟 ,希望能夠幫助到大家，一起來學(xué)習(xí)吧。
GRE寫作提升詞匯語法也是重要步驟
GRE寫作詞匯量足夠才能豐富具體內(nèi)容
首先小編要說的是GRE寫作詞匯，寫作詞匯并不是那些看過臉熟記住意思就行的詞匯，而是需要通過實(shí)際使用掌握了正確用法的詞匯。GRE對于詞匯在不同題型中有著不同的要求。數(shù)學(xué)詞匯只要能知道各個專用名詞的含義，能夠讀懂題目就算過關(guān)。而語文部分則要求考生具備一定的辨析能力，即深度理解。至于作文詞匯的要求則是最高的，也就是正確而合理的使用。
除了學(xué)會使用以外，考生對于GRE寫作詞匯，還需要學(xué)會替換。詞匯量不足最直接的表現(xiàn)之一就是一個詞匯的反復(fù)使用，特別是一些形容詞。用來用去都是同一個詞很容易讓人覺得厭煩。因此，對于常用詞匯多準(zhǔn)備一些可以替換的詞就顯得很重要了，因為這樣做可以使得使得文章語言多樣化。而準(zhǔn)備替換詞，平日積累是必不可少的。積累的最好方法就是閱讀。而且要注意避免用詞過于簡單和通俗，尤其要避免口頭語和俚語的使用，相應(yīng)地增加正式用語，尤其是在邏輯論證中，可以適當(dāng)使用較為學(xué)術(shù)的詞匯。
GRE作文語法不過關(guān)也會處處出錯扣分
GRE寫作中的語法問題同樣是困擾許多考生的一大難題。大量使用簡單句顯然不行，但一些復(fù)雜的結(jié)構(gòu)自己又沒有把握寫對寫好，那么語法應(yīng)該如何提升呢?大家不妨從GRE考試的其他題型中進(jìn)行借鑒。比如GRE語文部分的填空和等價題就可以幫助考生學(xué)會實(shí)用、簡潔、能夠清楚地表達(dá)自己的意思的詞匯和短語用法。而GRE閱讀也可以讓大家從中學(xué)習(xí)一些長難句，并學(xué)習(xí)作者立論和證明論點(diǎn)的過程，學(xué)習(xí)其中的過渡段落等等。當(dāng)然，GRE寫作考試的備考復(fù)習(xí)中，考生在充分利用閱讀、邏輯、填空題目進(jìn)行英語思維轉(zhuǎn)換之后，還要多閱讀一些范文，學(xué)習(xí)別人行文的方法，使之轉(zhuǎn)化成自己的資源，并且多加練習(xí)，久而久之寫作就不是一件難事了。
總而言之，想要寫出GRE高分作文，打好詞匯和語法的基礎(chǔ)是必不可少的。只有練好了這兩門寫作必備的重要基本功，考生才能游刃有余地表達(dá)出自己的想法和觀點(diǎn)，寫好作文。
GRE寫作高分范文：information
GRE寫作題目：
Much of the information that people assume is factualactually turns out to be inaccurate. Thus，any piece of information referred to as a‘fact’should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future.
大多數(shù)人們認(rèn)為是事實(shí)的信息結(jié)果實(shí)際上都是不準(zhǔn)確的。因此，任何據(jù)稱是事實(shí)的信息都應(yīng)該被質(zhì)疑，因為它在將來很可能會被證明為是錯誤的。
GRE寫作范文：
Should we be doubtful to all the information at hands because the rightness of which is uncertain? The speaker claims so，I concede that people often commit various fallacies in the course of cognizing things，however I fundamentally take exception of the arguer's assertion to mistrust every fact we might encounter. And I will substantially discuss my views thereinafter.
To begin with，the speaker seems to implicate that a fact would be proven false in the future under numerous circumstance. Nevertheless I prefer to arguer that facts never change. No matter how did the Medieval Church and Inquisition persecute Bruno，the fact never changes that the earth is far from being the center of the universe as the religious sovereigns had assumed or hoped for，while just a minor particle in it. Equally，no matter how Edison had tried to incite the public fear and distrust to the alternative current electricity，the fact never changes that Teals’ electrical system is vastly superior to his direct current electrical one，and would be accepted and applied in larger range.
However，what do change are the human's objective interpretations to facts. One compelling argument to this point is that，due to the limitation of human’s knowledge and comprehensive capability，they tend to make insufficient or even false understanding to the certain fact. An apt illustration is the changes of cognition to disease. While at the ancient time，our progenitors believed the a man becoming a patient for the reason that he had conduct crimes or offended some ghosts or spirits，the contemporary people have well know that the varies of pathogens are the basic causes to our diseases，and the defects of our immune system and so forth are also the factors as well. Another argument for the change of comprehension to fact is that different people always observe and interpret from different perspectives. Though the Relativity theory is not well compliable with the Quantum mechanism，no one call the greatness of both Einstein and Bohr，because their theories are based on distinct views，the former from the macrocosm and the later from the microcosm.
Notwithstanding the foregoing reasons for that human tend to make fallacies during the cause of comprehending and cognizing facts，these reasons should never be the excuses to doubt every conclusion we might draw from facts. Based on certain rational inference and proper knowledge fundament，the conclusions we make might well be justifiable，if not completely right，to certain degree. What we need to do is to promote the enterprise of pursuing the better answer and try to use the result we have get to application，instead of wasting our time to undue doubt and suspicion. Though the medical scientists have not fully understood the mechanism of how the does the implanted organ interact with the wounded body，they are not refrain from using the implanting skill to save patients，of course the precondition or which is that this technology is much well established than the fundamental theory.
To sum up，while I advocate the speaker's opinion that it is inevitable for human to comprehend facts inaccurately，for the reason of the limitation of the abilities，I essentially disagree with his assertion that facts will continually alter themselves，as well as his recommendation to discredit any piece of fact. In the final analysis，I would arguer once more that facts never change and although the misunderstanding to them is inevitable，we should not defer ourselves from the pursuit to fully comprehending them.
GRE寫作高分范文：審查的公正性
GRE作文題目：
Censorship is rarely, if ever, justified.
審查很少能夠做到公正。
GRE寫作正文：
“Censorship” is a word which seems to be authoritative rather than democratic, which implies the will of the governors rather than the will of general people. Since the occurrence of the censorship, which could be traced back to the Ancient Rome, it has been playing an important part in the domestic affairs while arousing applause and condemnation as well. Here the our government faces a dilemma, is it fair to carry on the censorship at the cost of sacrificing part of democracy, or just open the gate letting flows of ideas and thoughts in, at the risk of losing its own rampart.
Since censorship suggest an act of changing or suppressing speech, writing or any other forms of expression that is condemned as subversive of the common good, it must have a close relationship with the one who applies such supervision, and the word “common good” should be redefined under different conditions. There is time when we were all under a powerful monarchy, and the “common good” is the “monarch good”, then the censorship itself is the instrument of the monarch which solely depended on the will of the monarch; in the Middle Ages, both the Roman Catholic and the Protestant Churches practiced censorship that seemed to be oppressive to any ideas challenging the doctrines of churches and the existence of God; even now, in some authoritative countries, the censorship is used to rule its people by restricting their minds, of course, for the stability of their governing over the people. With these regards, censorship itself is questioned at the rationality of existing, regardless of the practices made by the democratic government, while the justice of the democratic government is quite doubtable.
The matter concerning is not only who practices the censorship but also how it is practiced. Since different men make different comments on the same work of art, for example, it is hard to set up a measure by which we could decide whether one should be prohibited, especially to the work of arts, as its content always labeled as “subversive” and “revolutionary”, two words detested by the governors most. Such cases could be found in Ulysses by J. Joyce and Lady Chatterley’s Lover by D.H Lawrence, these two great novels were firstly considered to be guilty of obscenity and were put to prohibition by the American government, but turned out to be true masterpieces today. So any form of censorship, to some extent, lags behind the development of ideas and will put more or less a negative effect on their development.
Though the censorship is such a disgusting word embodying so much oppression and might, it is a compromise we made with the reality far from being perfect, to provide a comparative stable ground which we could stand on. At this point, I don’t agree with the institute like ACLU who oppose any censorship. The censorship, though rarely justified, should exist as long as a more ideal and practical form is found to replace it, or we could only expect our God to create a more ideal species instead of imperfect human beings.
GRE寫作相關(guān)文章：
GRE寫作提升詞匯語法也是重要步驟
