拉低gre寫作分?jǐn)?shù)的原因
為什么gre考試寫作成績這么差?下面小編就和大家分享拉低gre寫作分?jǐn)?shù)的原因，希望能夠幫助到大家，來欣賞一下吧。
拉低gre寫作分?jǐn)?shù)的原因
原因1：
開頭冗長，繞來繞去，不知所云。擺一堆華麗而沒有實(shí)質(zhì)內(nèi)容的句子，然后突然寫出自己的觀點(diǎn)，這也會導(dǎo)致gre寫作分?jǐn)?shù)不高!
原因2：
開頭和主體段的第一段混為一談。有同學(xué)會直接寫“我同意……觀點(diǎn)因?yàn)椤币痪湓捊o出觀點(diǎn)，然后就直接開始寫第一點(diǎn)原因。這樣的文章結(jié)構(gòu)不清晰，在閱卷人眼中馬上被打上結(jié)構(gòu)不清的標(biāo)簽，如果再犯兩個(gè)語法錯(cuò)誤，那就別想翻身了。
原因3：
主體沒有分段，把所有的原因糅合在一起，讓讀者去自己理清條理。英語和中文不一樣。英語是作者責(zé)任制(writer-responsible),中文是讀者責(zé)任制(reader-responsible)。也就是說寫英文，作者需要保證讀者能明白自己寫的是什么，如果讀者不明白，那就是你作者的責(zé)任。而在中文中則正好相反，我想怎么寫就怎么寫，讀不懂是你讀者的問題。
原因4：
主體段每段中沒有主題句(topic sentence)，或者一個(gè)明顯的主題意思。我經(jīng)?？吹接腥苏f了一堆例子，卻不明白他要這些例子說明什么。其實(shí)，只要在每個(gè)段落前加一個(gè)很簡短的句子，告訴別人你在說什么，就會使文章變得很清楚。
原因5：
新gre寫作中的主體段有主題句，但是沒有對主題句進(jìn)行進(jìn)一步解釋，而是直接擺例子，這樣會顯得文章非常的唐突。
原因6：
gre寫作有開頭，但是在開頭作者沒有給出觀點(diǎn)，而是在結(jié)尾給出觀點(diǎn)。天道gre備考攻略提示，對于這種寫法，也有爭議，講英語的人也在爭論是不是世界上所有的人都應(yīng)該按照英語的文體寫。一般的結(jié)論是認(rèn)為，這取決于你的讀者，如果你的讀者是英語為母語的人，那么還是按照他們的習(xí)慣寫為好，不要追求什么神秘感，一定要等到最后才給出觀點(diǎn)。對于托福gre的作文，還是規(guī)矩點(diǎn)比較好。對于其他的文章看老師的要求，我的老師就要求我在寫某種論文的時(shí)候不要在開頭給出觀點(diǎn)，而是在結(jié)尾提出觀點(diǎn)。
GRE寫作高分范文：實(shí)用的意義
Practicality is now our great idol, which all powers and talents must serve.Anything that is not obviously practical has little value in today's world.
GRE寫作范文：
In today’s society idealism seems to become an ideology that is marginalized and practicality is our great idol, thus, the speaker asserts that anything that is not practical bears little value. I admit that being practical is the wide-accepted dogma in order to survive in this world, but by going too far to claim that anything that is not practical has little value is against the empirical observation as well as the general stimulus that push the human society forward.
Admittedly, practicality has become a cult in today’s society. Too often do we hear people talk about being practical whenever they come to make important decisions or choose between several alternatives. The deep-rooted cause underlying this phenomenon is that with the development of modern society, the emphasis is placed more on financial gaining, quick fame, sensible choice and so forth. Our society is rather stable compared with that of the last century when war, violence, human right movements has become the symbol of that period. People are enjoying this peaceful environment with less crucial missions rested upon them and as a result, they shift from idealism to struggle for the common well being of mankind to the practical concept of individual achievement.
This ideology has its merits since after all the disaster and upheaval that our human race has undergone, it is judicious to focus on the economic aspect of things in order to tackle the most important social problems such as poverty, hunger and environmental problems which all deserve us to sit down and work out practical solutions. On the personal level, being practical is how a person would possibly succeed in his career or personal life. One is likely to make sensible decisions for his education and job choice on the basis of practical consideration of his own strength and weakness and careful analysis of the prospect of research direction and job market. Even those in power and intellects need to consider practically since hasty decision built upon pure ideal meditation would hardly find its way in the modern society and is doom to failure.
Agreeing with the speaker that practicality has become the great idol in our society, I am strongly against his point that anything that is not practical has little value. Even in today’s society, idealism is by no means relegated to the place of total neglect and disregard. For one thing, in history, so much achievement is the outcome of several generations’ struggle such as fighting for equality for women, human rights movement,etc. In today’s society, practicality is the way we can obtain our goal but idealism offers the philosophical explanation of why we should set this as our goal and the clear the ultimate value of our pursuing. What is more, by totally fixed one's eyes upon the practical aspect of things, we face the danger of neglecting one important part of our pursuit, that is the mental enjoyment brought out by idealism. If we have a clear goal set in mind and put practical endeavor at the same time, the result would be more satisfactory and valuable.
To sum up, I agree with the speaker insofar as the wide acceptance of practicality is considered. Being practical is the tenet of modern society and it does shed light on the wise way of doing things and obtaining goals, no matter in the personal or social level.But the speaker goes too far by claiming that it is the only valuable ideology in society.I am strongly against this idea since in history or at present, we human beings still need the philosophical explanation to clear our goal and to provide motivation. In this aspect, idealism would never be replaced with pure practical consideration. Otherwise,human society will be replete with insensible people directed by economic profit and quick fame and recognition.
GRE寫作高分范文：政治的統(tǒng)一與分歧
The goal of politics should not be the pursuit of an ideal, but rather the search for common ground and reasonable consensus.
政治的目的不應(yīng)該是追求一種理想，而是尋求共同點(diǎn)和合理的一致。
GRE寫作范文：
I safely agree with the speaker's argument that the search for common ground and reasonable consensus is the goal of politics. But I am reserved to support his or her idea that the goal of politics should not be the pursuit of an ideal. The pursuit of an ideal is not doomed to conflict with the search for consensus.
Politics, as it was defined is an art of balancing, that is to keep subtle balance between different parties, which represent vested interests of different groups, hold different ideologies, to harmonize disparate social organization such as Green peace organization and Arms manufacture association, to concert different development plan and the like. Various interests of different groups intertwined together, forming a huge net. It is this net that restrains any individual part's self-intention and possible partial proposal, makes the leaders think over before leap. In this way, the policy making would be more stable and reasonable, meanwhile the majority’s interests could be taken care of. A convincing example in this point is the nomination of the candidate of President in certain party. One must be selected from tens of candidates who are on the behalf of different groups. At first, every group may name his own representatives,but the winner is single. After seeing his nomination is not supported by the majority,thus has no chance to win, they will compromise on the premise that their core interests are ensured, select the one who can be accepted by most groups if not all to reach reasonable consensus, This interacting relation is the fundament of democracy, which marks a country's civilization degree and propel the society to forge ahead.
When it comes to another point of the speaker’s argument, namely the goal of politics should not be the pursuit of an ideal; my attitude sharply varies between different explanations and comprehensions on the key word- ideal. If ideal was defined as impractical ideas- castle in the air, of course, it should not be the base for the policy-making. The leader with hollow ideal may lead his people to abyss, such as the former Iraq president ‘s dream of his “Arab empire”. However, if the ideal was defined as certain ground and reasonable ambition, it could even be argued that the very difference between politician and statesman comes from the pursuit of ideal. Politicians do with the ideal, statesman without. The most brilliant politicians in the history are those who are harboring holy but ground ideals, cherish their ideals as the source of commitment.
In a sum, politics has its specific trait, once an individual steps on the power stage; he (or she) will greatly influence the rest of people, and his (or her) decision impacting the interests of various groups are unavoidable to be the result of compromise, a wiser politician will pursuit their reasonable ideals and move ahead on the process of compromise.
拉低gre寫作分?jǐn)?shù)的原因相關(guān)文章：
拉低gre寫作分?jǐn)?shù)的原因
