GRE作文argument邏輯攻擊點有哪些
GRE寫作中的兩篇文章要求不同，ISSUE作為立論文類似大家常寫的議論文難度不大。下面小編就和大家分享GRE作文ARGU如何尋找邏輯攻擊點，來欣賞一下吧。
GRE作文ARGU如何尋找邏輯攻擊點
GRE作文argument邏輯攻擊點有哪些?
首先，小編為大家介紹一些在argument作文題目中比較常見的標(biāo)志性邏輯漏洞。假如大家在讀完題目第一時間沒有發(fā)現(xiàn)邏輯問題，那么考慮一下這些邏輯漏洞可能會為大家?guī)聿簧賹懽黛`感。
基本常識類漏洞
雖然GRE考試本身出于公平的原則并沒有對各類學(xué)科的高深專業(yè)知識提出要求，但考生還是需要具備一定的相關(guān)基礎(chǔ)常識，比如GRE考試中經(jīng)常涉及的社會、文化、經(jīng)濟(jì)、科技等常見主題的基本概念，都應(yīng)該有所了解。因為GRE作文中，常常會出現(xiàn)一些涉及這些基本知識的邏輯漏洞。如果考生能夠?qū)@些知識有所了解，就能在文章題目中發(fā)現(xiàn)更多問題。
絕對性用詞錯誤
如果大家讀過一些專業(yè)性較強(qiáng)的原版雜志報紙，比如《紐約時報》、《華爾街日報》或《經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)人》，就會發(fā)現(xiàn)其中很多文章都具備GRE作文考試最喜歡的特質(zhì)：思考全面，觀點平衡，有理有據(jù)。極端的觀點和結(jié)論在GRE作文中鮮少有正確的時候，也往往會是最主要的攻擊論點。因此，如果考生在題目的結(jié)論中看到了諸如“must”或者“undoubtedly”之類的用詞，那么這就是極端結(jié)論的最好證明。
模糊表述問題
在GRE寫作的題目中，諸如 “few”, “many”, “more”, “l(fā)ess”, and “some”之類的用詞常可以看到，這些詞雖然在一定程度上具備數(shù)字含義，本身卻并無法表達(dá)出具體的數(shù)字，可以說是含義相對模糊不清的用詞。如果題目中的論述，特別是涉及數(shù)據(jù)的部分是建立在這些模糊表達(dá)上而得出的結(jié)論，那么這個論述本身就存在問題，常常能成為可攻擊的邏輯漏洞。
錯誤推論漏洞
有些題目，常會根據(jù)一個較小的例子來得出一個很大的結(jié)論。這種以小見大的做法看似很好，但其實常常存在問題。比如一類事物中的A,B,C可能具備一些特性，能夠概括出某個共同的結(jié)論，但這結(jié)論并不一定就能適用于該類事物中的所有不同個體，而這種錯誤的一概而論，也可以成為考生論述中的突破口。
比較對象不當(dāng)擴(kuò)展
有時候，作文題目中會首先列出事物A的前提和結(jié)論，并根據(jù)A和事物B的相近性，把前提和結(jié)論套用到事物B上，這樣就往往會產(chǎn)生不恰當(dāng)?shù)谋容^，從而形成邏輯上的問題，舉例來說：曾看到過一篇例文，講述人和狗的肥胖問題，把人的肥胖原因和新城代謝等因此直接套用到狗的身上然后得出結(jié)論，這就是一種不恰當(dāng)?shù)谋容^。
GRE寫作挑攻擊點要分清主次
如上文所說，其實很多時候一篇argument題目素材里，存在的邏輯漏洞往往不止一處，對于一些寫作駁論文經(jīng)驗豐富的考生來說，有些題目甚至一眼望去就是千瘡百孔的。但這并不代表大家隨便抓住一點就可以寫出很有說服力的文章。學(xué)會區(qū)分邏輯漏洞的主要和次要，集中精力從主要漏洞入手進(jìn)行寫作才能讓文章更有說服力。
總而言之，想要寫好GRE寫作的ARGUMENT駁論文還是需要一定技巧和方法的。假如大家在面對ARGUMENT時還處于找不到邏輯漏洞無從駁起的階段，那么上文中提到的這些內(nèi)容，相信會給大家?guī)硪恍┨崾竞蛶椭?/p>
GRE寫作滿分范文
"Wisdom is rightfully attributed not to people who know what to look for in life but to people who know what to overlook."
The quotation is certainly correct, insofar as it describes at least an element of wisdom. In other words, I do agree with the proposition, subject to the proviso that the achievement of wisdom may well also involve other traits or attributes.
Having qualified my answer somewhat, I must endorse the principles put forth in the quotation. Overlooking -- or, perhaps, forgetting -- is a crucial skill one needs to master in order to navigate the often-treacherous paths of life without undue torment. From my own experience, and from observations of friends, family members and business associates, I am well aware of the pitfalls which await those who fail to overlook the petty, the unnecessary and the irrelevant.
In modern America, as it happens, the importance of overlooking is probably greater than ever before. Even a person trying to lead a quiet, simple life encounters an endless stream of annoyances, errors and petty demands such as paperwork, filing numbers and taxes; long lines at the bank; exponentially aggravating traffic jams and sullen, uncooperative coworkers and neighbors. Those of us who cannot overlook such annoyances will invariably succumb to self-defeating dismay.
The ability to overlook also reflects a healthy sense of proportion and priorities. The wise "overlooker" will ignore his or her spouse's failings after making a considered judgment that these are outweighed, in the long run, by greater and more significant strengths. for example, what wise or reasonable person would destroy a marriage solely because an otherwise faithful, kind, generous, intelligent and prosperous partner occasionally tosses socks on the floor?
An elderly aunt of mine makes a striking example. Long widowed, she now spends her days sitting in her apartment, carping endlessly about the many relatives who have slighted her. Nobody calls enough. Nobody pays her any atention. Nobody cares, she says.
And, indeed, why should they? Who wants to visit with someone, elderly or otherwise, who does nothing but complain, find fault and scour for slights? Were she wiser, perhaps she would ignore or even suppress her interminable grievances and take more interest in the world at large, including the very individuals whose attention she purportedly craves.
The paradigm of overlooking applies with equal force in the worlds of business and politics. Look at Richard Nixon: a brilliant, often original thinker, he was nonetheless continually obsessed with minutiae and the unimportant. On some level, I'm sure, he himself realized the dramatic impact of such a glaring character flaw; when the situation was long past salvaging, he exhorted his staff and friends to "Never be petty," a dictum he honored far more in the breach than in the observance.
More prosaically, in business and everyday life, it is indeed the wise person who overlooks or ignores a vast amount. Why come home every day nurturing a grudge? Why spend time grappling with activities, people or attitudes which bring nothing but pain and torment? Still, most of us do, at least somewhat, and find ourselves far diminished for it.
In sum, I think it's safe to say that much in this world merits not even a cursory examination, and those among us are wiser and happier who can successfully budget their time and energy in order to avoid negativity.
Comments:
This is a thoughtful, well-articulated analysis of the issue.
The response opens with a clear endorsement of the stated claim, along with an acknowledgement that wisdom involves additional traits. The writer then begins building an argument that modern life is so full of "petty annoyances" that it would be "self-defeating" to pay much attention to them. Using, first, examples that illustrate the trivial demands encountered everyday (e.g., paperwork, traffic jams), the analysis moves on to personal types of experiences (a partner annoying habits; an aunt self-pity) and then to politics, where, the writer implies, Nixon met his political demise at least partly because of his obsession with "minutiae and the unimportant." The examples clearly support the writer position and lead effectively to the concluding observation about learning to "budget" our time and energy to avoid the negative aspects of life.
In several places, the skillful use of questions helps move the analysis along. And throughout, the skillful use of sentence variety and precise vocabulary combine to convey meaning effectively, as in this excerpt: "when the situation was long past salvaging, he [Nixon] exhorted his staff and friends to a dictum he honored far more in the breach than in the observance." This kind of insightful, articulate analysis merits a score of 6.
GRE寫作滿分范文
The following appeared as a letter to the editor of a local newspaper.
"Five years ago, we residents of Morganton voted to keep the publicly owned piece of land known as Scott Woods in a natural, undeveloped state. Our thinking was that, if no shopping centers or houses were built there, Scott Woods would continue to benefit our community as a natural parkland. But now that our town planning committee wants to purchase the land and build a school there, we should reconsider this issue. If the land becomes a school site, no shopping centers or houses can be built there, and substantial acreage would probably be devoted to athletic fields. There would be no better use of land in our community than this, since a large majority of our children participate in sports, and Scott Woods would continue to benefit our community as natural parkland."
Since the residents are changing the original statement that complies with the conditions of what an undeveloped site is, it is their responsibility to make sure that certain restrictions are followed. According to the definition of undeveloped land, keeping the natural elements and avoiding the tearing down of this elements is an issue to consider even if it is a school built on the site.
Even though the residents originally wanted to keep the property undeveloped and unbuilt, the fact that they emphasize that this area will subtantially be devoted to athletic fields, strongly supports the idea of the residents using the land for similar activities than that of the public parkland, . Moreover, the fact that the residents mentioned the community as being one where children will be the main participants of this area is persuasive enough to make this argument a strong one.
Comments:
This response is seriously flawed. The first paragraph obliquely addresses the argument made in the topic, but stops short of logical analysis. The second paragraph agrees with the argument and supports its assumptions. In essence, the writer exhibits an uncritical acceptance of the argument.
Aside from a few minor errors, the writer has control over syntax, grammar, and the conventions of standard written English. This response, though, warrants a score of 2, because it offers no discernible analysis of the logic of the argument.
GRE作文相關(guān)文章：
★ 高三英語單詞匯總
下一篇：托福寫作常見語法錯誤有哪些
