GRE高頻作文其實沒那么好用
2020GRE高頻作文其實沒那么好用
GRE寫作部分的備考資料中，高頻題一直是比較受考生青睞的資料之一。下面小編就和大家分享GRE高頻作文其實沒那么好用，希望能夠幫助到大家，來欣賞一下吧。
GRE高頻作文其實沒那么好用
GRE寫作高頻作文題為何受歡迎?
很多同學在備考GRE作文的時候，之所以對“高頻”情有獨鐘，實際上思想根源還是希望能減少工作量，說得通俗一點，也就是還是抱有“投機取巧”的心理。這些同學的想法往往是：GRE官方的題庫給出的200多道題太多了，看高頻可以減低我的工作量(也就是不需要把200多道題目都看完)，如果在考試的時候遇到高頻題目，而我正好寫過的話，那么分數(shù)就是有保證的?；蛘撸辽俦葘懸黄耆珱]有看過的文章要強。如果我們把這些同學的看法當做一個論證的過程來找找其中的邏輯問題的話，大家就能明白為什么說“高頻只是個傳說了”。
從GRE作文論證結(jié)構(gòu)角度看高頻題作用
在這個論證過程中，同學首先假設(shè)了一個前提，就是“寫一篇已經(jīng)寫過的文章得到高分的可能性大于寫一篇沒有寫過的文章”?？墒?，我們考慮一下，如果本身這篇文章從一開始按照這個同學的分析思路，包括寫作的語言就存在巨大問題的話，那么，即使是考試的時候照著抄一遍，分數(shù)也仍然會是很低的。因此，只有當你的寫作思路正確，分析過程正確，語言表達正確這幾個條件都滿足的時候，對于題目的熟練程度，或者是否寫過某個題目的作文，才會影響到最后的分數(shù)。當然，我們還同時忽略了考場上的臨場狀態(tài)的變化問題。
而反之，如果一個考生有正確的分析思路和寫作思路，有比較好的語言表達能力，那其實考試的時候是否寫過某個題目就變得不重要了，因為最終他的能力會很好地解決題目熟悉程度的問題。比如我們所熟悉的高考語文中進行的作文測試，我們實際上是完全不知道考試會出現(xiàn)什么題目的，我們平時練習的時候，也基本上不會考慮考試的時候是否會遇到同樣的題目，但是最終，寫作能力比較好，思維方式比較正確，知識面比較寬的同學往往會在作文中得到高分。
從這個角度來看，實際上在準備作文的過程中，練習的題目是否是高頻并不重要，而重要的是，是否通過練習形成了正確的分析思路，寫作思路，并且讓語言的表達正確。
GRE寫作高頻題其實沒那么好用
另外，很多人也認為“高頻”題目在考試時被抽到的可能性更大，并且還有人會計算題目出現(xiàn)的概率。為了讓大家都能看明白，我不會在這里建立一個模型來計算什么題目出現(xiàn)的概率較大，我們只考慮如下的一些問題。首先，ETS在從開放題庫中抽取題目給考生的時候，是一種隨機的選擇方式，那么，每個題目被抽取到的概率是完全一樣的。而現(xiàn)在并沒有證據(jù)表明ETS在抽取題目的時候采用了任何優(yōu)先級策略，所以我們不能對此作出主觀假設(shè)。第二，從目前的高頻統(tǒng)計方式來看，存在著很大的漏洞。
大家不妨計算一下每天有多少人去參加GRE的作文考試，一年下來又有多少人參加作文考試，其中在網(wǎng)上發(fā)布題目的人的比例有多少，而發(fā)布出來的題目被統(tǒng)計的又有多少。如果這些數(shù)據(jù)本身都沒有確切值的話，那么統(tǒng)計的樣本首先就是存在問題的。而“高頻”的出現(xiàn)，很可能是“馬太效應(yīng)”的結(jié)果，即在很長一段時間里面，A題目被大多數(shù)人關(guān)注，于是成為了“高頻”的一部分，于是，有人考到了這個題目，在網(wǎng)上發(fā)了帖子，那么這個題目的關(guān)注度繼續(xù)上升。而那些“低頻”的題目，即使有人發(fā)了，也沒人去關(guān)注，但是很可能在一段時間后，某個“低頻”的題目其實出現(xiàn)的頻率很高了，但是卻依然沒有人去關(guān)注它。因此，要想得到科學的統(tǒng)計，必須有一個平臺，來隨時完整統(tǒng)計大多數(shù)人在考試中遇到的題目的情況，并且實時更新，才能得到較為準確的數(shù)據(jù)。
因此，在備考GRE作文的過程中，其實是否準備網(wǎng)絡(luò)流傳的“高頻”題目并不重要，而重要的是，無論準備什么題目，都能有正確的思考路徑和分析方法，并且能夠用正確的語言來表達自己的想法。當系統(tǒng)化的思維方式和準確的語言表達習慣形成的時候，無論什么題目都沒有問題。此外，如果希望消除題目熟練度的影響，大量閱讀題目，并且寫作提綱是必要的，其中也包括對題目的分析和簡單的邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)梳理。
GRE寫作高分范文：公正的法律
“There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws?！?/p>
有兩種法律：公正和不公正的。每個社會成員都有責任遵守公正的法律，但更重要的是，更應(yīng)該不遵守和反抗不公正的法律。
關(guān)鍵詞：obey just lawsdisobey and resist unjust laws
GRE寫作范文：
論證分析
當我們面對司法改革，提出探討司法理念時，往往會以“什么是司法的公正”、 “什么是法官的美德”等這樣的形式提出問題。這種形式的問題所問的是關(guān)于一般的公正和美德的問題。在司法的實踐中，對于具體的判決，人們一般是能夠評判是否公正的，而問題是評判有無共性呢?如果不存在，那么人們的評判又是以什么為標準的呢?如果存在，那它又是怎樣存在的呢?存在于哪里?而依照西方哲學的觀點，這種存在于我們可感知的具體事物之外的東西就是法的理念。
眾所周知，亞里土多德曾說過，要實現(xiàn)法治必須具備兩個因素：其一，所有人都服從法律;其二，被遵守的法律本身是良好的法律。 亞里土多德的說法看似全面，但在實踐中可能并不有效。
比如什么是良法，比如有人對允許墮胎、 安樂死、 同性戀的法律持有尖銳不同的觀點。人認為允許墮胎維護了女性的自身權(quán)利，允許安樂死和同性戀表現(xiàn)了對個人自由意志和愿望的尊重;有人則認為允許墮胎是不人道的，沒有保護胎兒的生存權(quán)利，允許安樂死違背了人的生存主旨，允許同性戀則敗壞了社會的道德風氣。在這種情況下，我們應(yīng)當認定誰的觀念是正確的?
我們又依據(jù)什么權(quán)力和所謂的理性剝奪和否定另外一些人的觀念呢?此外，人們對某一事物的好壞認識會隨時間的推移而發(fā)生變化，從前認為良好的法律現(xiàn)在可能認為不好，這時又怎么辦呢?
因此，當認為某些法律不是良好的法律時，人們便會認為自己沒有服從的義務(wù)，這樣便會出現(xiàn)不服從法律的現(xiàn)象。進而言之，堅持“良好的法律”這一概念可能會使法治處于困難的境地。
Should we obey an unjust law? According to the theory of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, 18th century French political philosopher, in a democratic society the state represents the general will of the citizens, and that in obeying its laws each citizen is pursuing his own real interests. Thus, in an ideal state, laws express the general will. An individual who disagrees with a law must be failing to look at things from the moral standpoint. Rousseau is talking about an ideal state where laws express people's general will, a will that aims at the common good. But the question is: are we living in an ideal state and do all the laws of our land express the common will of the people and should we obey all the laws even if they are unjust? Thenswer to this question can be different for different people.
GRE寫作高分范文：下一代的教育
GRE寫作題目：
How children are socialized today determines the destiny of society.Unfortunately, we have not yet learned how to raise children who can help bring about a better society.
現(xiàn)在孩子的社會化程度決定了社會的命運?？上У氖?，我們還沒有學會教孩子怎么樣去建設(shè)一個更好的社會。
GRE寫作范文：
People are never born into separated environment, while society will be their destiny to face and join no matter whether they are willed to do so. After being educated in greenhouses of campus,children will one day step into this destiny inevitably, therefore making socialization an indispensable progress of their growth. However, it seems to me that socialization is a method of acclimating to the surroundings and such abilities are inborn. So it may be too extreme and pessimistic to say we have not yet learned how to raise children who can help bring about a better society, especially when the education and other related fields are keeping a high-speed development.
Socialization, defined as converting and meeting the social needs, determines a society's future by making its members work as effective parts of it. Society is a huge constitution combined by different individuals and groups, who need cooperation with each other and gain the methods for living and developing. Modern development has made such cooperation spear into every corner of our daily life: industry, service, agriculture and academic fields provide the people living in a society what they need, and supported by each other's products.
Education, as a way for us to raise children, gives them knowledge to take parts in this society and realize their personal values. When entering schools, children are living with other contemporaries for years, learning how to communicate with each other, gaining senses of cooperation,competition and understanding. After that, they graduate and face the practical issues, such as manufacturing, researching, designing and so forth. All these issues ask for cooperation during modern time, because they are all highly complicated with different products provided by different fields. An architecture design project, for instance, contains parts of architecture design, structure design, air-conditioner system, water supply system and so forth. During its designing progress,architects and other experts need communicate with each other,
persuade or be persuaded to change their ideas and plans. If some one of them are not socialized and just keep on working individually, the outcomes will be not reasonable or even not feasible.
Moreover, socialization is an indispensable part of social living, even people do not take parts in producing. We are living in a connected world, facing other peoples for information, products and so forth. After graduating, children will leave their greenhouses which are supported by their parents, teachers and society. They have to work and live directly with other social members. If they are not socialized, and just continue their greenhouse life, they will find the world as a vacuum, bogging them with complex relation of people. In Japan, a group of people are called OTAKUs, who are trapped by their childhood interests, including animation, video game,internet, and the sense of security at home. Those people are a reverse example of those who are not well socialized. They have their own worlds, cut off with others, and they are afraid of communicating. As a result, certain social problems have long been reported among these OTAKUs, such as suicide, crime, psychic diseases and so forth. In this case we may know the importance of socialization.
GRE相關(guān)文章：