GRE作文之寫(xiě)作原則不能丟
GRE作文之寫(xiě)作原則不能丟?快來(lái)一起看看吧，分享下面小編就和大家分享，來(lái)欣賞一下吧。
GRE作文之寫(xiě)作原則不能丟
原則一：觀點(diǎn)上要有原創(chuàng)性
觀點(diǎn)是GRE作文考試的核心內(nèi)容，考察考生能否對(duì)一個(gè)觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行深入分析與思考并最終提出一個(gè)有層次的觀點(diǎn)。有了原創(chuàng)觀點(diǎn)就不用擔(dān)心雷同。而如果真的要借鑒范文觀點(diǎn)，建議大家應(yīng)該盡可能做一些調(diào)整，以避免雷同，也可以干脆在文中講明這個(gè)思路是借鑒了哪一本參考書(shū)的。美國(guó)人對(duì)真小人比對(duì)偽君子要寬容。
原則二：提升寫(xiě)作備考時(shí)間利用率
這個(gè)核心原則不僅是對(duì)GRE考試而言，實(shí)際上適用于所有考試：在最短的時(shí)間內(nèi)獲得最多的分?jǐn)?shù)。聽(tīng)上去簡(jiǎn)單明了，但做起來(lái)就就不是那么容易了，基本思路是既不做沒(méi)有效率的事情，也不做比較有效率的事情，而只做最有效率的事情。對(duì)于GRE考試來(lái)說(shuō)，要做到這一點(diǎn)就一定要學(xué)會(huì)選擇，即選擇最有效率的事情來(lái)做。
原則三：高分寫(xiě)作有套路
首先大家一定要搞清楚一個(gè)概念：英語(yǔ)作文水平和GRE作文高分之間并不存在必然直接的聯(lián)系，作文水平高的人很可能得不到高分，但是作文水平明明很低的人卻能一鳴驚人。這是因?yàn)榭脊俨粫?huì)看你以前的習(xí)作，也不會(huì)看你平時(shí)的水平，他只看你在考場(chǎng)上寫(xiě)出來(lái)的文章。
所以哪怕考生的文采斐然，每每創(chuàng)新，平時(shí)練習(xí)時(shí)屢出佳文，對(duì)于考試也不會(huì)有太大幫助。想要在GRE作文中拿到高分，考生要做的是把一個(gè)套路，一種思路，自己寫(xiě)得好的話語(yǔ)不斷的重復(fù)熟練，做到在考試中能夠收發(fā)自如，信手拈來(lái)，這樣自然就能拿到高分。
GRE寫(xiě)作想要拿到高分，遵循上述原則能幫助大家少走不少?gòu)澛罚俳Y(jié)合自己平時(shí)的復(fù)習(xí)練熟寫(xiě)作技巧并準(zhǔn)備好足夠的材料，相信大家都能在考試中取得滿意的成績(jī)。
新GRE寫(xiě)作范文：競(jìng)爭(zhēng)利弊問(wèn)題
題目：
"Competition is ultimately more beneficial than detrimental to society."
歸根結(jié)底，競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)于社會(huì)是利多弊少。
正文：
Darwin suggested that the process of evolution is one based on competition. This deadly competition weeds out the weak and only the fittest of the species survives. Humans, being the product of millions of years of evolution, are by nature, competitive beings. Yet, humans are also social beings. Like the bees in the hive, we are not very successful living completely on our own. We need to cooperate with other individuals for our survival. Thus, a conflict ensues, between our innate competitiveness, and our need to cooperate. There are pros and cons associated with both. However, it is my belief that overall, competition, is more detrimental than beneficial to human society.
First, let us try to identify why there is competition in the first place. In an environment abundant with resources, where supply outstrips demand, there is very little need for the inhabitants to fight with each other over them. This is not the case on planet earth. Resources are limited, and there is constant jostling to get to the front of the queue to get acquire them. For example, thousands of prospective students apply to gain entrance to top universities around the world, but there are only a handful of places in those universities. Thus, there is competition to get into to these hallowed institutions of higher learning.From a utilitarian perspective, competition is a good thing. In evolution it is responsible for the elimination of "weak" genes. In the business environment, it gets rid of the weaker players. In politics, it weeds out unpopular candidates. In academia, it gets rid of weak students.
Furthermore, competition leads to self improvement. Businesses will strive to offer better products and services at lesser prices. The consumer reaps rich rewards from this competitive spirit. Politicians strive to do the utmost for the people, so they would get reelected. Students excel in there studies, trying to outdo each other.
Thus, ostensibly, competition is responsible for the betterment of the society as a whole. However, this is just the superficial view. Underneath the surface, competition, in every aspect, is slowly eating away at the very fabric of the society.
While it is true to say that competition in corporate world has brought great benefits to the consumer, the society as "Missed A here"whole is playing a great price for it. Most businesses are exploiting cheap labour in the third world to maximise their profits. There are thousands of sweatshops run by well known western corporations in countries like Indonesia, Bangladesh and China. People are forced to work in squalid conditions, often 16 hours a day. They are lucky to receive a dollar a day for there labours. The moment a government in any of these countries try to improve the working conditions of the employees, these multinational giants flee the country, often leaving whole communities facing financial ruin. The corporations are aware that there are plenty of other labour markets that could be exploited with gay abandon.
That is just the human cost. What about the environmental costs? Competition has forced many corporations to "stream line" their operations. Environmental standards are normally the first victims of this "stream line" process. A significant amount of environmental pollution and land degradation has been blamed on industry, yet the factories keep producing more and more. Thousands of items go unsold each year due to competition. Only a fraction of this merchandise is recycled. The rest goes to the already overflowing landfills.
In politics, the detrimental effects of competition are blatant. Politicians often resort to popular yet socially damaging policies to gain votes. These measures include imprudent spending to rabble rousing. The current volatility in Israel and Palestine, the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka, and the famine in Zimbabwe are all, at least partially, problems created by politicians to get elected.
It has been said that education is one sphere where competition has always had a beneficial influence. Even this claim is dubious. Due to competition students are less likely to exchange ideas with one another, thus enriching the student population as whole. Furthermore, competition drives students to study well to pass exams, but not to gain wisdom. Students spend many hours preparing for standardised tests; tests which many believe are inherently flawed. Thus, it is often not the most intellectual student who succeeds, but the most competitive.
Competition is an inborn human trait. It has some positive qualities, but overall, it does far more harm than help to the society. As intelligent beings, humans can transcend their evolutionary weaknesses. Thus, humans should rely less competition and more cooperation for the sake of the society.
新版GRE寫(xiě)作新題庫(kù)：Argument
題目：
The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at Dura-Sock, Inc.
"A recent study of our customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process, which ensures that our socks are strong enough to last for two years. We have always advertised our use of the Endure process, but the new study shows that despite our socks' durability, our average customer actually purchases new Dura-Socks every three months. Furthermore, our customers surveyed in our largest market, northeastern United States cities, say that they most value Dura-Socks' stylish appearance and availability in many colors. These findings suggest that we can increase our profits by discontinuing use of the Endure manufacturing process."
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
中文翻譯：
最近一次對(duì)于Dura-Sock使用者的調(diào)查表明我們公司用于其專(zhuān)利生產(chǎn)方式"Endure"上的錢(qián)是浪費(fèi)的，這種方式使我們生產(chǎn)的襪子足以使用兩年。 Dura-Sock一直在做廣告宣傳它使用"Endure"方式，但這次新調(diào)查顯示盡管我們的襪子十分耐穿，但Dura-Sock的消費(fèi)者每三個(gè)月就買(mǎi)一雙Dura-Sock襪子。而且，在位于美國(guó)北部城市我們最大的商場(chǎng)回應(yīng)調(diào)查的Dura-Sock消費(fèi)者說(shuō)他們最欣賞Dura-Sock時(shí)尚的外觀和眾多顏色的選擇。這些事實(shí)說(shuō)明Dura-Sock可以通過(guò)停止使用"Endure"生產(chǎn)方式來(lái)增加盈利。
寫(xiě)一篇回應(yīng)，在其中檢視文章的論證中述及和/或未明確述及的假設(shè)，務(wù)請(qǐng)解釋文章的論證是如何依賴于這些假設(shè)的，并指出如果這些假設(shè)不成立會(huì)對(duì)文章的論證帶來(lái)何種影響。
GRE作文之寫(xiě)作原則不能丟相關(guān)文章：
