如何完成一篇高質量的GRE作文

如何完成一篇高質量的GRE作文?快來學習學習吧，下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。

如何完成一篇高質量的GRE作文

1.必須研究新GRE寫作范文，尤其是5分和6分的范文，他們真的非常重要，因為那是最權威的輔導資料。不是簡單的熟讀和背誦，而是逐字逐句的體會作者的意思及修辭。還有提醒一點，ETS對范文的評論也都非常精彩，建議大家參考!這會非常有利于理解考試所考的重點。

2.必須要熟練，重要的是形成慣性思維。GRE考試時間真的是太緊張了，要想現場思考每句話的調理性真的是太難了，遠遠超過了大腦運轉的速度，只有有充分思維準備的人，才能駕輕就熟，運用自如。

3.必須多修改，如果不勤修改自己的新GRE作文，就不知道自己原來的漏洞和不足在哪，悶頭寫，只能導致lose the stake! 當認真學習一段時間寫作之后，再回頭改第一篇習作，肯定會發(fā)現自己很多毛病，這說明： 我們在進步!

4.必須學習別人的文章，多看參考資料?？吹絼e人的文章和新GRE寫作思路，是提高自己水平的有效途徑!建議大家看看其他考生原來寫的習作，真的會受益匪淺。

5.必須多思考，多寫不如多改，多改不如多想，當然這種想不是fantasy and daydream。還要針對寫作思路和自我總結。

6.必須看全部題庫，不要抱僥幸心理，在考試之前找到文章中出現的邏輯錯誤，遠比在30min中為它而浪費時間值得的多。

7.必須多交流，聽聽大家的意見，有益無害。

8.必須要有自己的例子，沒有哪個考官會喜歡幾百號人都說一件事吧!

GRE作文可能用到的金句名言

KNOWLEDGE 知識篇

Activity is the only road to knowledge .

(George Bernard Shaw , British dramatist)

行動是通往知識的唯一道路 。 (英國劇作家 肖伯納。 G.)

A free man obtains knowledge from many sources 1 besides books .

(Thomas Jefferson , American president)

一個自由的人除了從書本上獲取知識外，還可以從許多別的來源獲得知識。

(美國總統 杰斐遜 。 T.)

A great part to the information I have was acquired by looking up something and finding something else on the way 。(Adams Franklin , American humorist )

我的大部分知識都是這樣獲得的：在尋找某個資料時意外的發(fā)現了另上的資料。

(美國幽默作家 富蘭克林。 A.)

If a man empties his purse into his head , no man can take it away from him , an investment in knowledge always pays the best interest .

(Benjamin Franklin , American president )

傾已所有追求知識，沒有人能奪走它;向知識投資，收益最佳。(美國總統 富蘭克林。 B.)

Imagination is more important than knowledge .(Albert Einstein , American scientist )

想象力比知識更為重要。 (美國科學家 愛因斯坦 A. )

Knowledge is power. (Francis Bacon , British philosopher )

知識就是力量。 英國哲學家 培根。 F.

The empty vessels make the greatest sound . (William Shakespeare , British dramatist )

滿瓶不響，半瓶咣當。 (英國劇作家 莎士比亞。 W.)

EDUCATION 教育篇

And gladly would learn , and gladly teach .( Chaucer , British poet)

勤于學習的人才能樂意施教。(英國詩人，喬叟)

Better be unborn than untaught , for ignorance is the root of misfortune 。(Plato , Ancient Greek philosopher)

與其不受教育，不如不生，因為無知是不幸的根源。(古希臘哲學家 柏拉圖)

Genius17 without education is like silver in the mine. (Benjamin Franklin , American president )

未受教育的天才，猶如礦中之銀。 (美國總統 富蘭克。 B.)

The roots of education are bitter , but the fruit is sweet .(Aristotle , Ancient Greek philosopher )

GRE寫作官方題庫高頻ARGUMENT題目滿分范文分享：charge people for using beach

GRE作文官方題庫ARGUMENT題目：

The following is a letter to the head of the tourism bureau on the island of Tria:

"Erosion of beach sand along the shores of Tria Island is a serious threat to our island and our tourist industry. In order to stop the erosion, we should charge people for using the beaches. Although this solution may annoy a few tourists in the short term, it will reduce the number of people using the beaches and will raise money for replenishing the sand. Replenishing the sand, as was done to protect buildings on the nearby island of Batia, will help protect buildings along our shores, thereby reducing these buildings' risk of additional damage from severe storms. And since the areas along the shore will be more attractive as a result, the beaches will be preserved and the area's tourist industry will improve over the long term."

【滿分范文賞析】

This letter's author recommends charging fees for public access to Tria's beaches as means of raising funds for the purpose of saving Tria's tourist industry. The author reasons that while beach-access fees would reduce the number of beachgoers, it would provide revenue for replenishing beach sand needed to protect nearby buildings. The measures would thereby enhance the area's attractiveness lending to long-term improvement. To support the argument the author indicates that on a nearby island, beach sand was replenished thereby reducing the risk of storm damage to buildings. The argument is not entirely convincing for the following reasons.

【本段結構】

本文采用了標準的Argument開頭段結構，即C—A—F的開頭結構。本段首先概括原文的Conclusion，之后簡要提及原文為支持其結論所引用的一系列Assumption及細節(jié)，最后給出開頭段到正文段的過渡句，指出原文的Flaw，即這些Assumption無法讓原文的結論具有說服力。

【本段功能】

作為Argument開頭段，本段具體功能就在于發(fā)起攻擊并概括原文的結論，即為了保護Tria城市的旅游業(yè)，需要對使用Tria沙灘的游客采取收費政策。本段接下來提到了原文中為支持之前的Conclusion所提供的證據，盡管收費政策會是當地的游客減少，但是收集來的資金能夠填補當地的用于保護臨近建筑物的沙灘。此外，臨近的島嶼在采取了相同的政策后，當地的沙灘得到了填補因此減少了暴風雨對建筑物的破壞。文章提及這些信息，為是在正文段中對這些Assumption即將進行的

First of all, the assumptions regarding the effects of the proposed beach-access fees weaken the argument. The author ignores the possibility that charging fees might deter so many tourists that Tria would be worse off overall or that the vast majority of Tria's tourists and residents alike would happily pay for beach access. In either case, adopting the author's proposal might harm, rather than benefit, Tria's tourist industry in the long run.

【本段結構】

本段采用了標準的Argument正文段結構，即先是提及原文的第一個邏輯錯誤，之后分析該邏輯錯誤的原因，接下來，進一步分析這樣的錯誤為什么讓原文的Conclusion不成立。

【本段功能】

作為正文第一段，本段攻擊原文所犯的第一個重要邏輯錯誤——因果類錯誤。原文假設通過采用收費政策，能夠得到解決沙灘填補問題的資金。但是這樣的因果關系并不一定成立，畢竟這個假設忽視了收費政策帶來的負面影響。因此，原文的結論不成立。

Also consider the case of nearby Batia where replenishing beach sand has served to protect shoreline buildings. Tria may not be able to achieve the same protective measures due to some geographical difference between the two islands. Perhaps Batia is in a far better position than Tria financially to replenish its sand on a continual basis. In short, the argument fails to present any evidence indicating that the islands are, in all practical purposes, the same and that the proposed measures would have the same desired effect.

【本段結構】

本段采用了標準的Argument正文段結構，即先是提及原文的第二個邏輯錯誤，之后分析該邏輯錯誤的原因，接下來，進一步分析這樣的錯誤為什么讓原文的Conclusion不成立。

【本段功能】

作為正文第二段，本段攻擊原文所犯的第二個重要邏輯錯誤——類比類錯誤。原文假設適用于Batia島的政策也能適用于Tria島。但是這樣的類比并不一定成立，因為這兩者之間可能存在很多差異性。因此在沒有考慮到差異性的情況下，原文的這個假設也是不合理的。

Finally, let’s also take into account the fact that even if replenishing Tria's beach sand is financially feasible and would protect nearby buildings, no evidence present indicates that Tria's tourist industry would be saved. Perhaps Tria's tourist appeal has little or nothing to do with the beach and nearby buildings. For that matter, perhaps Tria's tourist appeal would be greater with fewer buildings along the coast. The author’s argument isn’t compelling because there is no link between the wellbeing of the buildings along the coast to the overall health of the tourist industry.

【本段結構】

本段采用了標準的Argument結尾段結構，即C—S的結尾結構。首先再次重申原文Conclusion是站不住腳的，接下來給出可以增強原文說服力的合理的Suggestion，包括原文作者需要進一步提供的證據和細節(jié)信息等。

【本段功能】

段作為結尾段，具體功能即為總結歸納+提出建議。段落首先再次重申強調原文作者的論證不合理，接下來給出合理的建議：作者必須證明對沙灘游客采取收費的這種政策能夠給保護沙灘的資金收集帶來實際的正面效果，同時，沙灘的填補和臨近建筑物的保護的確能夠給當地的旅游業(yè)帶來積極的作用。不難發(fā)現，結尾段總結提出的建議與正文各段中依次攻擊的錯誤遙相呼應，即分別對應了樣本類錯誤和因果類錯誤，這使全篇文章顯得渾然一體。

GRE寫作范文：權威問題

GRE寫作題目：

Much of the information that people assume is ‘factual’ actually turns out to be inaccurate. Thus， any piece of information referred to as a ‘fact’ should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future.

大多數人們認為是事實的信息結果實際上都是不準確的。因此，任何據稱是事實的信息都應該被質疑，因為它在將來很可能會被證明為是錯誤的。

GRE寫作范文：

Should we be doubtful to all the information at hands because the rightness of which is uncertain? The speaker claims so， I concede that people often commit various fallacies in the course of cognizing things， however I fundamentally take exception of the arguer‘s assertion to mistrust every fact we might encounter. And I will substantially discuss my views thereinafter.

To begin with， the speaker seems to implicate that a fact would be proven false in the future under numerous circumstance. Nevertheless I prefer to arguer that facts never change. No matter how did the Medieval Church and Inquisition persecute Bruno， the fact never changes that the earth is far from being the center of the universe as the religious sovereigns had assumed or hoped for， while just a minor particle in it. Equally， no matter how Edison had tried to incite the public fear and distrust to the alternative current electricity， the fact never changes that Teals’ electrical system is vastly superior to his direct current electrical one， and would be accepted and applied in larger range.

However， what do change are the human‘s objective interpretations to facts. One compelling argument to this point is that， due to the limitation of human’s knowledge and comprehensive capability， they tend to make insufficient or even false understanding to the certain fact. An apt illustration is the changes of cognition to disease. While at the ancient time， our progenitors believed the a man becoming a patient for the reason that he had conduct crimes or offended some ghosts or spirits，the contemporary people have well know that the varies of pathogens are the basic causes to our diseases， and the defects of our immune system and so forth are also the factors as well. Another argument for the change of comprehension to fact is that different people always observe and interpret from different perspectives. Though the Relativity theory is not well compliable with the Quantum mechanism， no one call the greatness of both Einstein and Bohr， because their theories are based on distinct views， the former from the macrocosm and the later from the microcosm.

Notwithstanding the foregoing reasons for that human tend to make fallacies during the cause of comprehending and cognizing facts， these reasons should never be the excuses to doubt every conclusion we might draw from facts. Based on certain rational inference and proper knowledge fundament， the conclusions we make might well be justifiable， if not completely right， to certain degree. What we need to do is to promote the enterprise of pursuing the better answer and try to use the result we have get to application， instead of wasting our time to undue doubt and suspicion. Though the medical scientists have not fully understood the mechanism of how the does the implanted organ interact with the wounded body， they are not refrain from using the implanting skill to save patients， of course the precondition or which is that this technology is much well established than the fundamental theory.

To sum up， while I advocate the speaker‘s opinion that it is inevitable for human to comprehend facts inaccurately， for the reason of the limitation of the abilities， I essentially disagree with his assertion that facts will continually alter themselves， as well as his recommendation to discredit any piece of fact. In the final analysis， I would arguer once more that facts never change and although the misunderstanding to them is inevitable， we should not defer ourselves from the pursuit to fully comprehending them.

如何完成一篇高質量的GRE作文相關文章：