GRE作文開頭段寫法要點
一篇優(yōu)秀的GRE高分作文從頭開始就能給考官留下好印象。而一直以來作文開頭段的重要性也向來備受強調(diào)。今天小編給大家?guī)砹薌RE作文開頭段寫法要點 ,希望能夠幫助到大家，一起來學習吧。
GRE作文開頭段寫法要點
開門見山是開頭段寫法核心思路
開頭段的長度是考生首先要考慮好的一點。對于一篇GRE文章來說，開頭段應注意開門見山簡單扼要，通過短短幾句話把觀點表達清楚即可，一般建議以三句話為標準。過長的開頭段會給人頭重腳輕的感覺，從而導致文章整體失衡，是GRE寫作的大忌。有些考生過度強調(diào)開頭段的寫作，搜腸刮肚地把好詞妙句堆砌到開頭部分，其實這么做反而是大忌，很容易引起考官的反感導致意外扣分。
高分開頭段從引用原文入手
這是很多考生都容易忽略的一點。開頭段的第一句話，要先引用作文題目的內(nèi)容，通過引用自然過渡到論述當中。沒頭沒腦的直接開始論述，會讓人產(chǎn)生突兀的感覺，對于一篇以論述為主的文章來說是十分不利的。有些同學甚至老師生怕文章字數(shù)不夠，在開頭的引用部分對原文題目進行大量的PARAPHRASE改寫，想要多湊字數(shù)，這種投機取巧的方法一眼就會被考官發(fā)現(xiàn)，反而會讓開頭變得累贅，模糊掉考生自己的觀點，也是經(jīng)常造成扣分的原因之一。
ISSUE和ARGUMENT開頭段寫法有區(qū)別
GRE作文ISSUE的開頭段不必多說，直接闡明觀點就好。而駁論文ARGUMENT的開頭段，考生則需要做好兩件事。一是簡要說明論述的觀點，二是指出觀點的漏洞。只要做到這兩點，開頭段的作用就達到了。需要注意的是，在簡要說明觀點時，不要原句照抄題目中的觀點，適當變換一下表達方法是必要措施。另外，不要在開頭段中具體展開觀點的漏洞，簡單點出問題在哪里即可。把詳細展開部分留到正文當中。
GRE作文AW優(yōu)秀開頭段分享
因為開頭段需要簡潔，因此適當套用一些常用句式模式是不錯的做法。考生可以提前做一些模板的準備，盡量使用自己的語言來進行講述和整理，在寫開頭段時直接套用即可。下面是一些常用的開頭段句式：
“This plan is likely to fail due to flaws in the reasoning and logic of the editorial.”
“This remedy is unlikely to be successful due to flaws in reasoning.”
“This argument contains some egregious flaws in reasoning making the conclusion doubtful.”
“The success of this recommendation is doubtful considering the logical flaws and faulty assumptions on which it is based.”
總而言之，開頭段的好壞關(guān)于整篇文章給考官留下的第一印象，就好比面試時著裝是否得體一樣，這種印象將在很大程度上影響考官之后的判斷和打分，因此小編希望大家重視GRE作文開頭段的寫作，爭取寫出能夠第一時間征服考官的優(yōu)秀開頭段。
GRE寫作高分范文：新創(chuàng)意
GRE寫作題目：
Truly innovative ideas do not arise from groups of people, but from individuals.When groups try to be creative, the members force each other to compromise and, as a result, creative ideas tend to be weakened and made more conventional. Most original ideas arise from individuals working alone.
真正有創(chuàng)意的想法并非來自于群體而是來自于個人。當群體試圖創(chuàng)新的時候，它的成員之間會被迫相互妥協(xié)，結(jié)果就是新想法趨于弱化而更接近于傳統(tǒng)。大部分新想法都是來自于獨立工作的個人。
GRE寫作正文：
I agree with the speaker on that truly innovative ideas arise from individuals.Nevertheless, it is unfair to claim unilaterally that the groups tend to weaken creative ideas without thinking of their positive effects on the ideas; it is equally important for groups to examine, modify, or even reject the ideas.
First of all, truly innovative ideas are destined to arise from individuals in that inter-personal thinking process is so far impossible. This is to say, when we sit still and have a cluster of phenomena, theories, statistics and so forth of a certain issue in our mind, we are thinking it over yet with no assistance at all. After all it is impossible for one to intrude into other's mind. Following this principle, innovative ideas spark off during the process of meditation, and they are the produced by one's own effort. It is equally possible, however, for people to be inspired by each other, yet this is by no means assistance in thinking. Clues, hints, inspirations are to remind people of things ignored or taken for granted, but have nothing to do with the process of thinking, that is, to sort out the whole vision and draw conclusion. In one word, innovative ideas arise from meditation, which is solely limited within one body, one brain. Therefore innovative ideas are always the product of individual's work.
Nevertheless, it does not suggest that innovative ideas then have nothing to do with group work, and actually it is just the opposite. When a novel thought is brought up, it is of great importance to fully evaluate its validity, feasibility, and consequences if carried out. This point need no further illustration if we think of a father who resolutely stops his 6-year-old son from playing matches. The kid might have intended to try something new, driven by an innovative idea, yet the whole house might have caught fire also since the boy is incapable of dealing with accidents. This is the same case in academic fields. In a chemistry lab for example, a novel route design of synthesizing a new compound is never carried out without further evaluation. Practical conditions such as equipments, reagents, and economic efficiency, namely yield per cost, are always taken into consideration and sometimes restrict the application of those ideas.
This is to say, innovation is usually good but not always practicable. This claim is fully demonstrated in the political field. Governors of all levels must take holistic views of the situation and make balanced decision in order to avoid mistakes; innovative ideas alone cannot justify their practicability and goodwill to others. For instance, when we look back, the development of plastic industry has resulted in great loss in the global ecosystem. Thus we see the disastrous consequences of carrying out such innovative yet premature ideas.
Hence, it is necessary for the groups to assess, remedy, and conclude the value and use of innovative ideas. All innovative ideas should be brought to discussions. With the clash of skeptical attitude of others to the advocating behavior of the thinker, fallacies made in a haste can be easily found and eliminated, which rectifies, sometimes supplements the idea. I don't agree with the speaker on his/her judgment of group work as compromising, weakening and conventionalizing innovation. Group work promotes those justified and useful innovative ideas and rejects those invalid, sometimes dangerous ones, as we see the case between father and son, in a chemistry lab, in all nations around the world. Only after the group censorship can the innovative ideas be carried out and benefit people, and this is the time when its innovativeness is fully appreciated.
In conclusion, I concede that most original ideas arise from individuals, yet I believe the group effort on these ideas should never be downplayed. It is the group that judge,reject or develop these ideas; this process is equally important with the innovative thinking.
GRE寫作高分范文：政治領(lǐng)袖
Unlike great thinkers and great artists, the most effective political leaders must often yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise.
不同于偉大的思想家和藝術(shù)家，最杰出的政治領(lǐng)袖通常都必須為了妥協(xié)而屈從于大眾的意見并且放棄原則。
GRE寫作范文：
With the respect of history, today’s democratic structure of politic roots deeply in ancient Greek philosophers’ advocation for the respect of public and individual beings,their admiration of the egalitarian, and the eagerness for justice as well as the electoral system specially devised to surpvise those in power. The Renaissance taking place in Europe and the democratic Revolution booted up by Napoleon in France both have produced great thinkers who demand the restriction of the politicians’ power and authority, labeling the end of an era in which politicians could lay their hands on almost every objects of demand. Driven by this trend, the contemporary politicians ostensibly deprived of certain freedom enjoyed by most artists and scientists could no longer behave in the way they would like to. These people, taking the responsibility of the democratic government, are restrained from several aspects. These restriction mainly comes from the public’s desire and different groups’ attitudes.
Although being neglected sometimes, the artists and the scientists still adhere to their own responsibilities, appear undisturbed and display astonishing indifference to the public. Such right is deserved as to artists and scientists, since their insightful thoughts and complicated feeling about life far go beyond what normal people may achieve.Frustrated and deterred by these maestros, publics turn to the other extreme―ignoring these great thinkers and even cursing them as heretics that destroy the current harmony. Again, scientists and artists enjoy the freedom to obliterate the influence laid on them by the mundane world since their interests are just focused on the exploration of the purity of the truth and reciprocating the perfect memory of the past or wonderful visions about future, rather than caring for the public’s benefits.
During such process, they just jump out of the world and objectively describe it, any scorns or restrictions are treated as part of the object they are proceeding, and this is just the hits of their successes. Sometimes, certain behavior that even force the community members away from communicating with these elites are taken as pride in that artists and scientists could employ their free time to continue their interest.
On the other hand, never would the politician own such comparatively broad freedom. As for a politician, the key to success in politics is to gain and maintain political power.Such power comes from certain identification of the public morality with the politician’s private one and the balance of different groups’ benefits and demands. Consequently,the politician’s attitudes, behavior and even the life style are tightly restricted for fear that any diversion from public’s taste may conduce to losing authority which is a real tragedy for a politician. To be an effective political leader excludes the opportunity that a politician may taste the freedom of the same merits as that enjoyed by artists and scientists, the freedom characterd by consciously seperating oneself from commentary and neglecting the demands made by majority. The successful leadership could be achieved by submerging oneself into the public and being sufficiently prepared for sacrificing some freedom for the majority’s benefits.
It is always funny to imagine what will happen to a special politician who could share a scientist or an artist’s freedom. When this politician is bored at the legitimate meeting that is being broadcast by media agencies, he escape to have a chess with his child.Subsequently, critics begin to accumulate the dissatisfaction of the public to attack this leader’s lacking responsibility of the public affairs. Moreover, he may again utilize the freedom to isolate himself from the public pressure by flying out to have a summer holiday. Then, only one thing can be assured, our special politician is deprived of the right to initiate his power which is a symbol of the end of his political life.
The development of technology and recognition of our society require both politicians and insightful thinkers. However, the democratic system of our contemporary world fixes two distinct sets of freedom that could enjoyed by them. While we agree that artists and scientists enjoy the comparatively broad one, we can not expect the political leaders to have opportunity to taste it.
GRE作文相關(guān)文章：
★ 學習資料庫
★ 高三英語單詞匯總