GRE作文之老司機(jī)的建議不得不聽(tīng)

GRE作文之老司機(jī)的建議不得不聽(tīng)?快來(lái)一起看看吧，分享下面小編就和大家分享，來(lái)欣賞一下吧。

GRE作文之老司機(jī)的建議不得不聽(tīng)

不要照搬范文

GRE作文寫(xiě)作難度較高，如何寫(xiě)出一篇漂亮的文章是很多考生關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)，不少考生喜歡研究高分滿分，從中學(xué)習(xí)借鑒一些好詞好句和文章結(jié)構(gòu)，這種做法值得推薦。但有些考生對(duì)于范文采取了整篇整段大量背誦的方法，并在考試中直接套用，就十分危險(xiǎn)了。

GRE考試對(duì)于抄襲作弊的判定十分嚴(yán)格，完全照著范文一字不差的背誦默寫(xiě)，很容易被判為雷同而作為抄襲處理，后面將十分嚴(yán)重，建議大家在使用范文時(shí)更多的從參考學(xué)習(xí)的角度出發(fā)，即使要使用一些范文中的好詞妙句，也盡量適當(dāng)做一些變形，用自己的表達(dá)方式來(lái)改寫(xiě)句子，這樣不僅能避免雷同抄襲的問(wèn)題，使用自己的語(yǔ)言也更容易記住。

擴(kuò)充寫(xiě)作詞匯

GRE考生對(duì)詞匯量的要求很高，這中要求也體現(xiàn)在寫(xiě)作部分。想要寫(xiě)出一篇好文章，充足的詞匯量必不可缺，沒(méi)有足夠的詞匯，很多恰當(dāng)?shù)囊馑季蜔o(wú)法得到很好的表達(dá)，用詞也容易出現(xiàn)重復(fù)，這都會(huì)無(wú)形中降低文章的質(zhì)量，影響最后得分，所以GRE寫(xiě)作想要拿到高分，充足的詞匯量必不可少。

文章開(kāi)頭段要寫(xiě)好

GRE寫(xiě)作的開(kāi)頭段主要用于交代討論話題，表明作者觀點(diǎn)。建議考生最好最有效的方法就是開(kāi)門(mén)見(jiàn)山，點(diǎn)到即可。具體的論述可以留在主體段擴(kuò)展，這么做是因?yàn)殚_(kāi)頭段一般來(lái)說(shuō)都是考官必讀段，開(kāi)頭段的寫(xiě)作水平會(huì)直接決定文章給考官留下的第一印象，如果這個(gè)段落寫(xiě)得好，之后往往會(huì)得到比較高的評(píng)價(jià)，因此，考生在開(kāi)頭段上需要多花功夫，觀點(diǎn)要鮮明，遣詞造句要講究，而一些關(guān)于語(yǔ)言正確性的諸如拼寫(xiě)等基本問(wèn)題，更是要特別注意。如果自覺(jué)寫(xiě)作水平足夠，也可以適當(dāng)使用一些比較地道的英語(yǔ)表達(dá)來(lái)加深印象，比如名詞性從句，被動(dòng)語(yǔ)態(tài)等。

準(zhǔn)備恰當(dāng)?shù)睦?/p>

GRE作文在論證過(guò)程中，往往需要使用一些例子來(lái)支持或反駁觀點(diǎn)。考生需要多準(zhǔn)備一些例子，背熟后方便考試時(shí)直接取用。當(dāng)然，準(zhǔn)備例子也要講究技巧，一個(gè)是盡量準(zhǔn)備一些適用范圍比較廣的例子，碰到相似的作文題目都可以套用;另一個(gè)技巧是盡量不要用那些太過(guò)千篇一律的例子，這些例子可以說(shuō)已經(jīng)被用濫了，考官估計(jì)也看了無(wú)數(shù)遍，很容易產(chǎn)生厭煩的情緒，從而降低得分。例子的獲取可以靠自己平時(shí)積累，GRE本身的閱讀題目就是很好的例子來(lái)源，還有高分作文范文，也常常會(huì)有一些很好用的例子。

注意最后結(jié)尾段

由于GRE作文的評(píng)分要求之一就是文章完整性，所以如果考生在寫(xiě)作時(shí)，因?yàn)闀r(shí)間緊張感覺(jué)可能來(lái)不及寫(xiě)完，那么寧可中間段少寫(xiě)一點(diǎn)，也要先把結(jié)尾給完成。有了結(jié)尾就代表了文章的完整性，之后有時(shí)間可以再把中間段的論述加以補(bǔ)充完善。

新GRE寫(xiě)作范文：避免偏激

題目：

Most people often look for similarities, even between very different things, and even when it it is unhelpful or harmful to do so. Instead, a thing should be considered on its own terms: we should avoid the tendency to compare it to something else.

人們總是在尋找相同點(diǎn)，即使是在非常不同的事物間也不例外，甚至有時(shí)候這樣做是無(wú)用乃至有害的。實(shí)際上，我們應(yīng)該具體問(wèn)題具體分析;我們應(yīng)該盡量避免比較的傾向。

正文：

In the age of accelerating changes, the eagerness to understand things in an effective and equally efficient way is more than ever. Although all kinds of complex techniques, skills and equipments helpful for understanding and studying the objects are easily accessible to people, the basic strategies stay the same as before: one is starting from similarities and the other from distinction. From my personal point of view, only by using the two in proper proportion and order can one achieve his/her goal to understand a thing.

Looking for similarities is a proper starting point. When we first meet something new,we need to clarify its basic attributes, finding similarites with other familiar things and classify it according to those attributes. Classification according to similaties is of great assistance to provide us with an outline, basic knowledge which we can base further investigation upon. Although things in contemporary age represent themselves in various forms and styles, similarities exist in any pair as long as certain perspective can be found. For instance, Bookcase and window are so different that at first glance, one may not be able to find the similarities, or even such an effort seems to be meaningless. Yet, they are both part of a house, something that must be taken into consideration when decorating or refurnishing the house. Such a comparison would be helpful for us to realize that “buy” and “sell” are two basic operation we can have upon window even though we have no idea what window is made of, how it is produced or what its function is.What’s more, looking for similarities not only refer to the object itself, but the relationship with others. Similar relationships helps people understand things in groups or pairs using the strategy: analogy. Analogy is especially useful when the charactertistics of a relationship rather than the objects themselves are the focus of understanding and when similar relationships are known and objects unknown. For example, if told that the relationship between window and ASVE is similar to that between book and read, one can safely guess that ASVE is the operation people can take on window although ASVE stays an unknown action.

Definitely, mere similarity usually exclude the distinctive characteristics of a thing. We need to investigate its own terms for deeper understanding. Within the rough outline sketched by similarity, a more detailed and well-articulated picture can be drawn by grasping own terms of a thing. Still take window as an example. From careful observation, we know that it is transparent, it consists of different chemical materials, it performs the function as to protect privacy, to preserve desirable temperature indoor, and sometimes to prevent rains and snows from going inside. Deeper and further understanding of window can only be gained when we take its own terms besides those it shares with bookcase into consideration.

In the newly development software engineering model named Object-oriented model,the strategy “similarity first and differences later” functions as the core and focus of the whole model. Objects sharing common points are put into same “classes” and common points are processed together, later they are defined, discussed and processed respectively according to their own characteristics. This method greatly reduces the repetive time and energy spent over and over again on similar, if not utterly same, terms. Translated into daily life, starting from similarites for a quick outline and transferring to grasp distinctive characteristics for deeper understanding isthe approach we should always bear in mind when hoping to understand a thing with effectiveness and efficiency.

新版GRE寫(xiě)作新題庫(kù)：Argument

題目：

The vice president for human resources at Climpson Industries sent the following recommendation to the company's president.

"In an effort to improve our employees' productivity, we should implement electronic monitoring of employees' Internet use from their workstations. Employees who use the Internet inappropriately from their workstations need to be identified and punished if we are to reduce the number of work hours spent on personal or recreational activities, such as shopping or playing games. Installing software on company computers to detect employees' Internet use is the best way to prevent employees from wasting time on the job. It will foster a better work ethic at Climpson and improve our overall profits."

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

中文翻譯：

為提高我們的員工的生產(chǎn)效率，我們應(yīng)該在員工的電腦上加裝電子監(jiān)控來(lái)監(jiān)視員工對(duì)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的使用。如果我們要減少用于私人以及娛樂(lè)活動(dòng)，比如購(gòu)物或玩游戲的工作時(shí)間，那么在電腦上不正當(dāng)使用互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的員工必須要被確認(rèn)并且受到懲罰。通過(guò)在公司電腦上安裝檢測(cè)員工使用互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的軟件，我們可以防止員工浪費(fèi)時(shí)間，并培養(yǎng)C公司更好的工作氛圍，以及提高我們的整體利潤(rùn)。

寫(xiě)一篇回應(yīng)，討論還需要何種具體的證據(jù)才能更好的評(píng)估上面的論證，并解釋這個(gè)證據(jù)是如何強(qiáng)化/削弱這篇文章的論證的。

新版GRE寫(xiě)作新題庫(kù)：Argument

題目：

The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at Dura-Sock, Inc.

"A recent study of our customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process, which ensures that our socks are strong enough to last for two years. We have always advertised our use of the Endure process, but the new study shows that despite our socks' durability, our average customer actually purchases new Dura-Socks every three months. Furthermore, our customers surveyed in our largest market, northeastern United States cities, say that they most value Dura-Socks' stylish appearance and availability in many colors. These findings suggest that we can increase our profits by discontinuing use of the Endure manufacturing process."

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

中文翻譯：

最近一次對(duì)于Dura-Sock使用者的調(diào)查表明我們公司用于其專利生產(chǎn)方式"Endure"上的錢(qián)是浪費(fèi)的，這種方式使我們生產(chǎn)的襪子足以使用兩年。 Dura-Sock一直在做廣告宣傳它使用"Endure"方式，但這次新調(diào)查顯示盡管我們的襪子十分耐穿，但Dura-Sock的消費(fèi)者每三個(gè)月就買(mǎi)一雙Dura-Sock襪子。而且，在位于美國(guó)北部城市我們最大的商場(chǎng)回應(yīng)調(diào)查的Dura-Sock消費(fèi)者說(shuō)他們最欣賞Dura-Sock時(shí)尚的外觀和眾多顏色的選擇。這些事實(shí)說(shuō)明Dura-Sock可以通過(guò)停止使用"Endure"生產(chǎn)方式來(lái)增加盈利。

寫(xiě)一篇回應(yīng)，討論還需要何種具體的證據(jù)才能更好的評(píng)估上面的論證，并解釋這個(gè)證據(jù)是如何強(qiáng)化/削弱這篇文章的論證的。

GRE作文之老司機(jī)的建議不得不聽(tīng)相關(guān)文章：