文小秘 > 英語資料 > 英語寫作 > 寫作方法 > GRE寫作高分具體方法心得講解

GRE寫作高分具體方法心得講解

陳鈴1147 分享 時(shí)間:

GRE作文一直都是中國考生比較難以保證得分的一個(gè)項(xiàng)目。而許多同學(xué)為了應(yīng)對(duì)GRE作文常會(huì)使用的方法就模仿高分范文。下面小編就和大家分享GRE高分作文標(biāo)準(zhǔn)提示詞,來欣賞一下吧。

GRE寫作高分具體方法心得講解

GRE作文模仿準(zhǔn)備工作介紹

1.要有可以模仿的文章(最好是帶有說理性的文章)。

2.你要理解這個(gè)文章,理解它的用詞、句子結(jié)構(gòu)、段落結(jié)構(gòu)。

3.這些文章都有正確的中文翻譯。同時(shí),文章的長(zhǎng)度不能超過500字。

怎么模仿?舉個(gè)例子:首先要分析文章,分析每一句和上一句是什么關(guān)系。美國人寫作文的一個(gè)特點(diǎn)是,通常每段的第一句都包含了整段文字的內(nèi)容,也就是我們常說的topicsentence。另一個(gè)特點(diǎn)是當(dāng)你寫完一個(gè)句子后,你要問WHY。你提出一個(gè)問題,然后給出一個(gè)圓滿的回答,這就是一篇優(yōu)秀的作文。

GRE寫作模仿訓(xùn)練要做到這兩點(diǎn)

1.抽象的能力(abstract);

2.具體的能力(details/examples)。

具體化并不代表要寫一個(gè)完整的故事。但是任何一篇文章都要給人一個(gè)具體的意向。通過具體的東西來描述才能給人塌實(shí)的感覺。具體化只要舉出幾個(gè)地方、幾個(gè)名字、幾件小事就可以了。

為什么好多同學(xué)作文中分?jǐn)?shù)很低呢,就是因?yàn)?,他提出了問題卻沒有回答。

通過不斷的模仿寫作,就可以不斷的糾正語法和詞組錯(cuò)誤。如何把抽象和具體結(jié)合起來是一個(gè)重點(diǎn),如何在一個(gè)段落中只表達(dá)一個(gè)思想,這是另一個(gè)重點(diǎn)。美國人的判分特點(diǎn)是,如果你在一段中表達(dá)了一個(gè)以上的思想,那你的分?jǐn)?shù)就不會(huì)高了。

分析完一篇文章后,怎么模仿著寫呢?就是看著中文的翻譯,把上面的英文一字不落的寫下來,當(dāng)你實(shí)在想不起來的時(shí)候,再看原文。等到寫完之后,和原文對(duì)照一下,看看是誰寫的漂亮。我剛剛開始模仿寫作的時(shí)候,發(fā)現(xiàn),模仿了幾天后,寫作水平的確提高了。因?yàn)楦鶕?jù)記憶學(xué)原則,這個(gè)單詞你背過、讀過,它都不能寫在你的文章中間。如果一個(gè)單詞可以經(jīng)常出現(xiàn)在你的腦子和文章中間,那這只證明了一件事,就是你寫過這個(gè)字。但是你自己寫作你不可能用到這個(gè)字,那就只有一個(gè)可能,就是你在模仿文章時(shí)寫過這個(gè)字。如果一個(gè)結(jié)構(gòu)別人寫不出來,你能寫出來,那你的分?jǐn)?shù)就會(huì)高。

GRE寫作模仿訓(xùn)練有哪些好處?

1.你的語法錯(cuò)誤會(huì)越來越少;

2.句子結(jié)構(gòu)能力越來越強(qiáng);

3.用詞能力大大增加。

GRE寫作滿分范文

"Both the development of technological tools and the uses to which humanity has put them have created modern civilizations in which loneliness is ever increasing."

Looking at the above statement, I see a lot of truth to the statement . There are many ways that society has used the advanced technology in order to isolate themselves. It may or may not be a consious move, but the results are all the same. The isolation occurs in a variety of ways and in all different areas. By computerizing factories, there are more and more people working long hours by themselves, with there only companion as a computer monitor. Although the company may be getting better production, the question that needs to be ask is at what cost to their employees.

It is not only the management of big factories that are responsible for this isolation. This lonliness can be seen in many other settings. With the growing popularity of the television, the nation is seeing a decline in families talking and an increase in watching the television. Not only can this result in a generation of "coach potatoes", it is also causes less communication and a feeling of isolation from everyone that a person cares about.

So far technology has entered the work place and the home, it has also entered the social relm. When you go to order food in the drive-thru, who is or better yet what is it that you talk to? It is a machine, although there is a person on the other end, you are still reciting your order to a machine. If it is ten o'clock at night and you need money, there are ATM's. All of these gadgets may be very nice and convient, but they result in lack of human contact.

Although it might be easy to blame technolgy for our feelings of loneliness, it is just a cop out. By looking at all the ways technology causes isolation, it is still people who choose to use these convenient methods. If a person wants to have human contact, all they have to do is go inside to the bank or go inside the resturaunt to order. What it basically boils down to, is that it is our choice whether or not we use technology. It is a scary thought to think maybe one day we might live in a society where you will never have to leave your house. That by using FAX machines, computers, modems, and the telephone a person would never have to have human contact to get their job done. The thing is that if that is not what we as a society wants, we are the ones to speak out and change the outcome.

Comments:

This is a competent discussion of the issue. The position presented in the first paragraph -- that "there are many ways that society has used the advanced technology in order to isolate themselves" -- is adequately sustained, but the examples are not always clearly relevant (e.g., in the case of paragraph one's "computerizing" of factories, the decision to use the technology is not made by the individual worker.) Also, the reasoning is not developed as fully as it would be in a response at the score level of 6 or 5.

While organization is adequate, the response lacks the organized coherence of ideas that exemplify a 5 essay. Transitions, within and between paragraphs, are not always logical. The last paragraph could be much more clearly focused: since several sentences repeat the same idea -- that "it is our choice whether or not we use technology" -- and the purpose or meaning of others (e.g., the last) is not immediately clear.

In general, ideas are presented clearly, although awkward phrasing sometimes contributes to vagueness (e.g., "By looking at all the ways technology causes isolation, it is still people who choose to use these convenient methods"). Lack of sentence variety seems to inhibit the communication of ideas (e.g., many short sentences are often used where one or two compound ones could make the points more effectively). Overall, however, this is an adequate response to the topic.

GRE寫作滿分范文

"Both the development of technological tools and the uses to which humanity has put them have created modern civilizations in which loneliness is ever increasing."

Technology, broadly defined as the use of tools, has a long history. Ever since Erg the caveman first conked an animal with a rock, people have been using technology. For thousands of years, the use of tools allowed people to move ever closer together. Because fields could be cultivated and the technology to store food existed, people would live in cities rather than in small nomadic tribes. Only very lately have Erg's descendants come to question the benefits of technology. The Industrial Revolution introduced and spread technologies that mechanized many tasks. As a result of the drive toward more efficient production and distribution (so the ever larger cities would be supported), people began to act as cogs in the technological machine. Clothing was no longer produced by groups of women sewing and gossiping together, but by down-trodden automation's operating machinery in grim factories.

The benefits of the new technology of today, computers and the internet, are particularly ambiguous. They have made work ever more efficient and knit the world together in a web of information and phone lines. Some visionaries speak of a world in which Erg need not check in to his office; he can just dial in from home. He won't need to go to a bar to pick up women because there are all those chat rooms. Hungry? Erg orders his groceries from an online delivery service. Bored? Download a new game. And yet...

Many people, myself included, are a little queasy about that vision. Erg may be doing work, but is it real work? Are his online friends real friends? Does anything count in a spiritual way if it's just digital? Since the Industrial Revolution, we have been haunted by the prospect that we are turning into our machines: efficient, productive, souless. The newest technologies, we fear, are making us flat as our screens, turning us into streams of bits of interchangable data. We may know a lot of people, but we have few real friends. We have a lot of things to do, but no reason to do them. In short, the new technology emphasizes a spiritual crisis that has been building for quite some time.

As I try to unravel which I believe about the relative merits of technology, I think it is instructive to remember technology's original result. A better plow meant easier farming, more food, longer lives, and more free time to pursue other things such as art. Our newest technology does not give us more free time; it consumes our free time. We are terminally distracted from confronting ourselves or each other. We stay safe, and lonely, in our homes and offices rather than taking the risk of meeting real people or trying new things.

While I am certainly not a Luddite, I do believe we need to look for a bit more balance between technology and life. We have to tear ourselves away from the fatal distractions and go out into the world. Technology has given us long lives and endless supplies of information. Now we need to apply that information, use the time we're not spending conking our dinner with a club, and find our reasons for living.

Comments:

This outstanding response displays cogent reasoning, insightful, persuasive analysis, and superior control of language. The response immediately identifies the complexities of the issue and then playfully explores both the benefits and the drawbacks of technological developments over the course of human history. The writer maintains that a "balance between technology and life" is necessary if humans are going to abate the loneliness that is part of modern existence.

In contrasting the intended purpose of technology at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution with the end result of the use of today's technology, the writer skillfully expands the initial position and makes a sound point: "While technological developments have helped society in a practical way, they have contributed to a spiritual crisis that has been building for quite some time."

The analysis is tightly organized. With well-chosen examples and a character called Erg, the response moves well beyond a listing of examples, developing the analysis over five focused paragraphs, each building on the previous one. The conclusion -- that as a result of technology the individual begins to lose sight of the need to connect with fellow citizens in a meaningful way -- follows directly from the preceding paragraphs, while adding substantive analysis.

This writer is clearly in command of language and syntax, varying the sentence structure to express concepts succinctly. Word choice is generally precise and often highly effective, as in the following examples: "down-trodden automation," and "haunted by the prospect that we are turning into our machines: efficient, productive, soulless."


GRE寫作相關(guān)文章:

GRE寫作:高分沖刺

GRE寫作:怎樣準(zhǔn)備提綱

GRE寫作:寫作論據(jù)的技巧

GRE背單詞記不住怎么辦

GRE寫作:怎樣緩解緊張

組織主題夏令營(yíng)活動(dòng)策劃方案2020

夏令營(yíng)特色活動(dòng)策劃方案

夏令營(yíng)實(shí)踐主題活動(dòng)策劃方案范文

有關(guān)金字塔原理讀后感范文

2020年開學(xué)第一課演講稿800大學(xué)

477324