雅思寫(xiě)作易犯錯(cuò)誤點(diǎn)
一些“學(xué)霸”的雅思閱讀和聽(tīng)力能上8分，但是寫(xiě)作卻遲遲不上6分，寫(xiě)作成了他們聽(tīng)說(shuō)讀寫(xiě)中的拉分項(xiàng)和申請(qǐng)名校的絆腳石，這讓很多烤鴨“迷惑不解”甚至“灰心喪氣”。下面小編就和大家分享雅思考試經(jīng)驗(yàn)寫(xiě)作突破6.5分技巧，來(lái)欣賞一下吧。
雅思寫(xiě)作避開(kāi)這四項(xiàng)錯(cuò)誤
第一，不要字體潦草。
第二，不要單邊論證。
第三，不要錯(cuò)誤太多。
第四，不要邏輯混亂。
第一點(diǎn)要牢記的是，千萬(wàn)不要字體潦草，難以辨認(rèn)。很多考生認(rèn)為字體不重要，平時(shí)寫(xiě)字就龍飛鳳舞，到了考場(chǎng)時(shí)間緊張，字體更加潦草，難以辨認(rèn)，給考官閱卷帶來(lái)困難。字體不好會(huì)不會(huì)影響分?jǐn)?shù)? 想想看，考官是通過(guò)閱讀你寫(xiě)的文字來(lái)了解你的觀點(diǎn)和思路，判定你的寫(xiě)作水平，而每篇文章通常只有2—3分鐘的閱卷時(shí)間，如果字體潦草，難以辨認(rèn)，影響了考官的閱讀和理解，勢(shì)必會(huì)影響分?jǐn)?shù)，所以親愛(ài)的考生們，一定要字跡工整清晰啊!
第二點(diǎn)要牢記的是，千萬(wàn)不要單邊論證，結(jié)構(gòu)失衡。在雅思大作文題目中，通常都有兩個(gè)對(duì)立面需要去分別闡述和論證，如果你只說(shuō)其一，不說(shuō)其二，片面看待問(wèn)題，很容易造成寫(xiě)作偏題，結(jié)構(gòu)失衡，因此而失分。比如下面這個(gè)題目：
Some people think money which the government spends on art, such as music and painting, would be better spent on things more important. Do you agree or disagree?
該題話題屬于政府支出類，題目中有兩個(gè)對(duì)立面，分別是art和things more important，都需要闡述。而有的同學(xué)只寫(xiě)things more important，比如教育和醫(yī)療，忽略其對(duì)立面art，那么這樣的文章就是偏題，沒(méi)有完全回應(yīng)題目的要求，會(huì)因此而失分?？忌趯忣}的時(shí)候，一定要把握住題目中的對(duì)立面，正方和反方都要有相應(yīng)的主體段落。
第三點(diǎn)要牢記的是，千萬(wàn)不要語(yǔ)法錯(cuò)誤太多、用詞不當(dāng)。6分的作文，是一篇可讀性較強(qiáng)的文章，可以是簡(jiǎn)單句為主，復(fù)合句為輔，語(yǔ)法錯(cuò)誤很少，讀起來(lái)通順流暢。很多考生誤以為“牛”的文章就是大詞長(zhǎng)詞、從句套從句，因此他們過(guò)于追求生僻的詞匯和復(fù)雜的句型，經(jīng)常出現(xiàn)用詞錯(cuò)誤和語(yǔ)法錯(cuò)誤。殊不知這樣錯(cuò)誤百出的文章，在考官眼里只是“小學(xué)生作文”，很難上6分。因此，筆者建議考生盡量選擇有把握的常用詞匯，力求寫(xiě)出符合英語(yǔ)語(yǔ)法的準(zhǔn)確句子，多寫(xiě)多練，提高表達(dá)的準(zhǔn)確性，這樣就離6分越來(lái)越近了。
第四點(diǎn)要牢記的是，千萬(wàn)不要邏輯混亂，思維跳躍。有的考生在論證觀點(diǎn)時(shí)不符合常理和邏輯，比如在論證因果關(guān)系時(shí)，不是從原因到結(jié)果一步一步往下推進(jìn)，而是想到哪說(shuō)到哪，思維跳躍，缺乏邏輯。這樣的文章，考官讀起來(lái)可能感到不知所云。其實(shí)在論證時(shí)，并不需要高深莫測(cè)的思想和標(biāo)新立異的觀點(diǎn)，只要把論點(diǎn)合理展開(kāi)，解釋清楚，符合常理和邏輯就可以了。
雅思寫(xiě)作Task2社會(huì)類考官范文
Write about the following topic:
In most countries multinational companies and their products are becoming more and more important. This trend is seriously damaging our quality of life.
Do you agree or disagree?
Model Answer:
Multinational companies nowadays find it convenient both to market their goods all over the world and set up production facilities wherever they find it convenient. In my opinion this has had an adverse effect on our quality of life in three main areas.
The first area is their products. Supporters of globalization would argue that multinational companies make high-quality goods available to more people. While this may be true to some extent, it also means that we have less choice of products to consume. When powerful multinational companies invade local markets with their goods, they often are obliged local companies with fewer resources to go out of business. In consequence, we are obliged to buy multinational products whether we like them or not.
This brings me to my second point. It is sometimes said that multinational companies and globalisation are making societies more open. This may be true. However, I would point out that as a result the human race is losing its cultural diversity. If we consumed varied products, societieswherever we live would be more varied. This can be seen by the fact that we all shop in identicalmultinational supermarkets and buy identical products wherever we live.
Thirdly, defenders of multinational companies often point out that they provide jobs. Although this is undoubtedly true, it also means that we have become more valnurable on them, which in turn makes us more vulnerable to their decisions. When, for example, a multinational decides to move its production facilities to another country, this has an adverse effect on its workers who lose their jobs.
All in all, I believe that if we as voters pressured our governments to make multinational companies more responsible and to protect local producers from outside competition, we could have the benefits of globalisation without its disadvantages.
雅思寫(xiě)作Task2社會(huì)類考官范文
Write about the following topic:
Modern lifestyles mean that many parents have little time for their children. Many children suffer because they do not get as much attention from their parents as children did in the past.
Do you agree or disagree?
Model Answer:
People who argue that nowadays parents give less attention to their children than in the past are frequently looking back to a brief period of time in the twentieth century when mothers in middle-class families remained at home to look after their children. What these people are suggesting is that women nowadays should not go out to work.
The fact of the matter is that in the majority of families in the past both parents worked much longer hours than they do nowadays. What has changed is that now in most countries their children attend school rather than also working themselves. In that sense they may have less contact with their parents.
Nowadays, as a result of acquiring an education, children come into contact with teachers who naturally have to explain why some of their students are failing. What teachers come up with are frequent stories of parents who are simply too busy for their children. And if children are not supervised by their parents, they will often underperform at school. However, academic failure is nothing new even when one or both parents are at home. If children are neglected by their parents, they will suffer.
In my opinion, children probably suffered more in the past when the whole family was obliged to work long hours just to survive. Nowadays children are protected by the law. Moreover access to education means that they have greater opportunities than ever before.
英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作相關(guān)文章：
★ 2020中考英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作萬(wàn)能句型38句
★ 高考英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作40個(gè)高級(jí)句型整理分享
★ 2020年中考英語(yǔ)作文預(yù)測(cè)及參考范文四篇
