2020GRE寫(xiě)作提升備考效率實(shí)用方法思路講解

GRE寫(xiě)作怎么練才能快速提高，對(duì)于大部分備考時(shí)間并不是特別充裕的考生來(lái)說(shuō)，在較短時(shí)間內(nèi)有效快速提高寫(xiě)作成績(jī)，都是十分需要學(xué)習(xí)掌握的，下面小編就和大家分享GRE寫(xiě)作提升兩篇文章備考效率實(shí)用方法思路講解，來(lái)欣賞一下吧。

GRE寫(xiě)作提升兩篇文章備考效率實(shí)用方法思路講解

根據(jù)備考時(shí)間確定新GRE作文的復(fù)習(xí)重心

對(duì)于時(shí)間不是很充足的同學(xué)們來(lái)說(shuō)，把a(bǔ)rgument放在首位會(huì)是比較有效率的選擇，因?yàn)閍rgument和issue想必更注重思想性,而這恰巧是中國(guó)學(xué)生更擅長(zhǎng)的內(nèi)容,所以也比較容易在短期內(nèi)收到成效。這也就是為何大部分中國(guó)學(xué)生的argument一般也會(huì)比issue高出0.5到1分的原因。所以如果備考時(shí)間不夠，那么這個(gè)時(shí)候的策略就應(yīng)該是保argu爭(zhēng)issue.而對(duì)于時(shí)間比較充裕的考友們,開(kāi)始的時(shí)候可以從issue入手，因?yàn)檫@個(gè)還是比較容易在短期之內(nèi)提高的。而且先解決對(duì)語(yǔ)言較高的issue之后，用issue準(zhǔn)備過(guò)程中積累的詞匯和經(jīng)驗(yàn)來(lái)準(zhǔn)備argue就會(huì)覺(jué)得得心應(yīng)手，更容易言之有物，寫(xiě)出充實(shí)的內(nèi)容。

確定重心之后下面就進(jìn)入較為實(shí)質(zhì)性的練習(xí)GRE作文階段了,要說(shuō)提高寫(xiě)作的途徑是什么,千變?nèi)f變離不開(kāi)的前提就是多讀多寫(xiě),也就是多積累多練習(xí).離開(kāi)了本質(zhì)一切所謂的技巧都只是空中樓閣。

練習(xí)GRE作文前的準(zhǔn)備工作

下筆寫(xiě)作文之前,要解決幾個(gè)問(wèn)題。一個(gè)是了解ETS的作文要求,一個(gè)是語(yǔ)言和例子的積累.還有一個(gè)是熟悉GRE作文題庫(kù)以及分類,關(guān)于作文要求,剖析的其實(shí)已經(jīng)不少了,市面上各種各樣的作文書(shū)也涵蓋的差不多了所以要做的就是上一個(gè)或者是買基本作文書(shū)入門一下。以便于大致了解ETS要考什么內(nèi)容，考試是什么形式，范文是怎么寫(xiě)的。完成了這一步，就算是走過(guò)了寫(xiě)作準(zhǔn)備的第一步。一旦有了進(jìn)攻的方向，所有問(wèn)題便可迎刃而解。所以制定出GRE作文如何入手，是解決GRE作文復(fù)習(xí)問(wèn)題的基礎(chǔ)。無(wú)論是看、背、寫(xiě)哪一樣，都必須從自身問(wèn)題出發(fā)。

如何積累和練習(xí)新GRE作文

雖然GRE的作文題庫(kù)官方一早就全部給了出來(lái)，但一上來(lái)就狂寫(xiě)的做法顯然不夠理智。特別是在下手寫(xiě)第一篇issue和argument的時(shí)候會(huì)覺(jué)得非常不順手。因?yàn)閷?xiě)作備考真正提高的時(shí)間還是在寫(xiě)作的過(guò)程中。不過(guò)在此之前看一定量的書(shū)還是很必要的作為積累還是很有必要的。當(dāng)然，一直積累卻不敢下筆去寫(xiě)，因此消耗掉大量時(shí)間的做法也是矯枉過(guò)正不可取的。

綜合下來(lái)的做法，比較推薦先積累到一定的基礎(chǔ)，感覺(jué)比較有把握之后，就開(kāi)始下筆寫(xiě)幾篇，然后從這幾篇習(xí)作中找出自己的薄弱環(huán)節(jié)進(jìn)行加強(qiáng)，并在最后一個(gè)月左右的時(shí)候做一些?？加?xùn)練。熟悉完GRE作文題庫(kù)和范文及作文要求以后可以嘗試著寫(xiě)一篇然后找一下差距,語(yǔ)言和例子在之前積累了更好,但是如果積累不足的話也可以先寫(xiě)一篇然后跟范文對(duì)照一下找一下不足,然后改進(jìn)，在準(zhǔn)備的過(guò)程中再積累。所以,剛開(kāi)始克服對(duì)于作文的恐懼心理寫(xiě)幾篇還是很重要的。

GRE寫(xiě)作高分范文：北美GRE寫(xiě)作滿分范文

如此說(shuō)來(lái)，Official Guide上的范文就彌足珍貴，無(wú)論6分的還是5分、4分的都要仔細(xì)分析，尤其是其中所給與的分析和評(píng)論更是要細(xì)細(xì)體味，領(lǐng)悟其精神，然后用心實(shí)踐。

GRE寫(xiě)作題庫(kù)范文下面是一篇官方給出滿分的ARGUMENT范文，我們來(lái)一起賞析，看看它為何能scored six (先讀文章，再看我的點(diǎn)評(píng))

The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper:

"Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money."

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

GRE首段

This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. However, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesn't necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree.

GRE中間段1

The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense.

GRE中間段2

This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.

GRE中間段3

Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature.

GRE末端

In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment (i.e。， coal mine)。 Before any decision is made, all this things must be considered, not simply the reduction of payroll expenses.

GRE這篇官方欽定滿分的范文，其最明顯的優(yōu)點(diǎn)在于：

1. 字?jǐn)?shù)高達(dá)599words, GRE充分體現(xiàn)了字?jǐn)?shù)為王的判分傾向。

2. 標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的五段制，首段、GRE末端，中間三段，看上去很美。

3. 沒(méi)有陳詞濫調(diào)、GRE滿篇廢話的模板式語(yǔ)言。

只有以上三點(diǎn)離滿分還是很遠(yuǎn)的，GRE之所以SIX，我看更重要的在于，每段各盡其責(zé)，既獨(dú)立又統(tǒng)一，形成了完整的ARGUMENT，specifically:

1. 首段再現(xiàn)了原TOPIC的推理過(guò)程，GRE并指出其assumptions多有不適;尤其令閱卷人高興的是：首段在最后簡(jiǎn)化羅列了推理中的三個(gè)問(wèn)題。要知道美國(guó)人就喜歡的作文---總分式，在首段就把三個(gè)ideas羅列出來(lái)，然后在中間三段分別展開(kāi)，先總后分，一目了然。

2. 中一的TS -- “The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment.”可謂是一針見(jiàn)血，一劍封喉。對(duì)于這樣嚴(yán)重的推理漏洞，如果不首先指出，其argument必然軟弱乏力。此所謂Topic中的 “必削點(diǎn)”，不可不察。

3. 中二的TS – “This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment.”這可謂是劍走偏鋒，獨(dú)辟蹊徑，出人所料。文章竟然批評(píng)了Topic以錢為本經(jīng)營(yíng)理念，提出了要以人為本，這樣寫(xiě)是有一定風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，畢竟這不是Issue。那本文是如何化險(xiǎn)為夷的呢?且看本段最后一句“this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.”我不由得長(zhǎng)舒一口，人家再次回歸了，又回到了Topic中以“Money”為本的推理。

4. 中三的TS – “Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer.”這充分體現(xiàn)了作者不只是坐而論道的arguer，而是關(guān)心其可行性的現(xiàn)實(shí)主義者，考慮到方案本身的可行性和局限性。

5. 末端不但對(duì)首段提出的論點(diǎn)做出了重復(fù)性的總結(jié)，GRE而且又不厭其煩地把中間三段的ideas一一羅列。如此“啰嗦”估計(jì)令某些同學(xué)略有不齒，但這恰恰是美國(guó)人的最愛(ài)，cultural shock了吧?

本文最令我欣賞的地方，GRE就是對(duì)EXAMPLES的運(yùn)用

1. 中間段一，運(yùn)用了“設(shè)例”GRE(假設(shè)的情況)，$100 million啦、$5,000了，很幼稚是吧?可美國(guó)人喜歡啊;咱中國(guó)的學(xué)生，尤其是理工科的，喜歡用一些相當(dāng)高深的例子，有沒(méi)有想過(guò)那些閱卷老師能看懂嗎?尤其是在極短時(shí)間內(nèi)，他們IQ又不高，知識(shí)又不多，聯(lián)想又不豐富……

2. 中間段二，運(yùn)用了“具例”GRE(具體的例子)，舉一個(gè)婦孺皆知的Toyota例子把想說(shuō)明的問(wèn)題統(tǒng)統(tǒng)道出，再次體現(xiàn)出美國(guó)人喜歡淺顯易懂的事例。

3. 中間段三，運(yùn)用了“泛例”GRE(某一類人、團(tuán)體或組織)，通過(guò)采煤行業(yè)指出了計(jì)劃可行性的所受到的制約，一個(gè)多么質(zhì)樸無(wú)華的泛例，充分地考慮到了閱卷老師的理解能力。

以上這一切怎能不讓美國(guó)閱卷者頻頻頷首，GRE嘖嘖稱善呢?他或她手中的筆在紙上劃出了一條美麗的弧線 —— 6

相反，有些中國(guó)學(xué)生，憑借自己繁密的邏輯、GRE淵深的例子和云霧繚繞的行文，每每令那些閱卷者咬唇咂舌，shrug連連，又怎能獲得一個(gè)理想的分?jǐn)?shù)呢?你挑戰(zhàn)了他的智商，他必然報(bào)復(fù)你的分?jǐn)?shù)。

GRE寫(xiě)作高分范文：冒險(xiǎn)計(jì)劃

Success in any realm of life comes more often from taking chances or risks than from careful and cautious planning.

在生活的所有領(lǐng)域中，成功往往更多的來(lái)自于把握機(jī)會(huì)或者冒險(xiǎn)而不是通過(guò)仔細(xì)謹(jǐn)慎的計(jì)劃。

GRE寫(xiě)作范文：

The speaker asserts people are more likely to attain success when taking chances or risks than planning carefully and cautiously. However, after comparing the characteristics of careful planning and taking chances, I strongly hold that they are of the same importance in the pursuit of success.

In competitive sports, while making appropriate training plans and effective competition strategies constitute necessary conditions of winning the matches, taking risks is almost inevitable when athletes or their coaches confront a sudden matter that might influence the course of a match and that has not been taken into consideration beforehand. In modern competitive sports, it is widely acknowledged that scientific and effective training contributes to athletes’ better performance during matches. Good competition strategies, on the other hand, resulting in the better allocation of physical force, better use of skills or the higher rate in scoring, also play a vital role.

However, when the star players of a soccer team or a basketball team are off the game or fail to implement their chief coach's strategic intention, leaving the whole team in adverseness, the coach faces the choice whether to substitute he/she or not. No doubt substituting a star player with a bench player means taking risk because the bench player may not perform as good as the star player and may make matters worse. If this happens, the substitution will incur discontentment of the players and critique from the team's fans, media and the boss. The capability of the coach may then be suspected and he/she may even be fired. Nevertheless, if the coach dares not to take the risk to substitute a poorly performed star player, his/her team will probably lose the game. Taking chances and risks is reasonable when one is dealing with something that has not been taken into consideration previously. So, in competitive sports, planning and risking are both necessary.

In academic fields, careful and cautious planning is required for large projects and application disciplines while revolutionary scientific breakthroughs are almost impossible without taking chances or risks. Before starting the research project on human genome, scientists had already made plans on the content and method of the research. They did not have to take any chances or risks because all they should do have already been carefully planned. There were no technical obstacles that had not been solved. Therefore, they just followed the plan step by step and accomplished the project in the end. As for significant scientific breakthroughs, they are the important discoveries and theories that disaccord, at least to some extent, with established principles or our intuitions, such as the Theory of Relativity and quantum mechanics. One has no choice but to take chances because established theories may not be applicable on the boundary of what is known and what is unknown. Only after being examined through experiments, practices and observations, can they be confirmed or belied. In a word, planning and taking chances or risks are different means for different levels of academic researches.

In the business world, cautious planning contributes to the long-term development of a company and at the same time, risking is imperative for a company to survive, develop and thrive in the highly competitive society. Planning carefully on inquiring market, training stuff and manufacturing products ensure a company's long-term development by keeping its profit increasing or at least not declining. On the other hand, taking risks, such as incorporating with another company, involving in the market fields that have already been occupied by other enterprises or involving in the market fields that are not considered so profitable, is also necessary because these may save the company from the adversity or help to set foot in new businesses. Clearly,in the business field, planning and risking complement each other.

To conclude, success in any realm of life comes equally from taking chances or risks and from careful and cautious planning. In most cases, they complement each other and pave the way towards success.