GRE寫作你需要知道這幾點

陳鈴1147由分享時間：2020-09-02 18:16:54

如果你想在新的GRE寫作中取得一些成績，你需要努力學習?？荚嚽?，我們需要制定一個可靠的計劃，有針對性地進行練習。下面小編就和大家分享GRE寫作你需要知道這幾點,希望能夠幫助到大家，來欣賞一下吧。

GRE寫作你需要知道這幾點

制定一種新的GRE作文備考方法，發(fā)現了自己的不足，集中突破

每個GRE作文考生都有不同的專業(yè)背景、準備時間和英語基礎，作文中的問題當然是不同的：有的是優(yōu)秀的語言和思想，有的是深思熟慮的，有的是表達不好的，有的是英語好的，有的是開不開主意的。一個作文組只有幾十個人能看出區(qū)別。統(tǒng)一的準備方法并不一定意味著對每個人都有高效率。在互相幫助的同時，也要注意對方最需要改進的方面。你不需要很全面。

提高寫作效率的GRE作文準備新方法

很多GRE作文考生精力充沛，一天一題或一場爭論，但如果基本問題得不到解決，沉迷于題海戰(zhàn)術，往往是半途而廢。在網上玩圍棋時，經常會看到仍處于入門水平的棋手有上千甚至上萬人(如果一天有三局，那就快10年了)，這意味著基本的建筑都建得不好。盡管GRE作文考官可以幫助你很好地修改它，但你不能完全理解你在語法或思維方式上錯誤的根源。你只能希望背誦每一篇修改過的文章，然后在考試中遇到它。

如果你記不太清楚或者根本就沒見過，那是個大問題。我喜歡實踐理論實踐的螺旋式發(fā)展方法。首先，我發(fā)現問題，gre寫作方法, gre備考要多久然后我系統(tǒng)地研究奠定了良好的基礎。當我覺得自己進步了，我就練習，然后發(fā)現問題，然后再進步。

基于作文大綱選擇性的gre作文寫作新方法

這是第二點。這一策略存在兩個問題：一是根本問題沒有解決;二是機會成本過高。所謂機會成本，就是你花太多的時間，可以用來做更有意義的事情，比如背單詞、學習語法或者閱讀來開拓思路。想象一下你的英語很差，但是你的寫作很難。在考試中，你碰到了筆試題。你的作文得了5分以上，但口頭作文只有300分以上。人們一眼就能看出你的真實水平。所以我認為在奠基的時候，gre寫作方法, gre備考要多久我們應該集中精力準備提綱，也就是思考。

論點可能不需要為每一篇文章準備提綱，但問題是最好仔細考慮如何寫每一篇文章。好好想想。如果你在考試中遇到一個問題，最可能讓你驚慌的是什么?可能你以前沒見過這個問題，也不知道從哪里開始。如果你想一想，即使你還沒寫，也不會太緊張。準備考試時，我只寫了兩個問題和兩個論點。我大部分時間都在熟悉這個話題。我一點也沒讀這些論點。這期約讀了一半。有點小看了。如果我把它們都讀了，我會更冷靜。

考試中，一道題是關于具體問題、關于兒童教育的問題;另一道題是關于抽象問題，藝術家或評論家為人們帶來永恒的價值。第一個問題比較容易發(fā)展，但我不準備當場就提出;第二個問題有提綱，但我還沒有寫出來。猶豫了三分鐘后，我選擇了第二個問題。因此，我的選擇是絕對正確的。雖然具體的題目容易寫，但在這么短的時間內很難組織好。如果中間有一個小小的障礙，心情會受到很大的影響。

GRE寫作高分范文：新創(chuàng)意

GRE寫作題目：

Truly innovative ideas do not arise from groups of people, but from individuals.When groups try to be creative, the members force each other to compromise and, as a result, creative ideas tend to be weakened and made more conventional. Most original ideas arise from individuals working alone.

真正有創(chuàng)意的想法并非來自于群體而是來自于個人。當群體試圖創(chuàng)新的時候，它的成員之間會被迫相互妥協(xié)，結果就是新想法趨于弱化而更接近于傳統(tǒng)。大部分新想法都是來自于獨立工作的個人。

GRE寫作正文：

I agree with the speaker on that truly innovative ideas arise from individuals.Nevertheless, it is unfair to claim unilaterally that the groups tend to weaken creative ideas without thinking of their positive effects on the ideas; it is equally important for groups to examine, modify, or even reject the ideas.

First of all, truly innovative ideas are destined to arise from individuals in that inter-personal thinking process is so far impossible. This is to say, when we sit still and have a cluster of phenomena, theories, statistics and so forth of a certain issue in our mind, we are thinking it over yet with no assistance at all. After all it is impossible for one to intrude into other's mind. Following this principle, innovative ideas spark off during the process of meditation, and they are the produced by one's own effort. It is equally possible, however, for people to be inspired by each other, yet this is by no means assistance in thinking. Clues, hints, inspirations are to remind people of things ignored or taken for granted, but have nothing to do with the process of thinking, that is, to sort out the whole vision and draw conclusion. In one word, innovative ideas arise from meditation, which is solely limited within one body, one brain. Therefore innovative ideas are always the product of individual's work.

Nevertheless, it does not suggest that innovative ideas then have nothing to do with group work, and actually it is just the opposite. When a novel thought is brought up, it is of great importance to fully evaluate its validity, feasibility, and consequences if carried out. This point need no further illustration if we think of a father who resolutely stops his 6-year-old son from playing matches. The kid might have intended to try something new, driven by an innovative idea, yet the whole house might have caught fire also since the boy is incapable of dealing with accidents. This is the same case in academic fields. In a chemistry lab for example, a novel route design of synthesizing a new compound is never carried out without further evaluation. Practical conditions such as equipments, reagents, and economic efficiency, namely yield per cost, are always taken into consideration and sometimes restrict the application of those ideas.

This is to say, innovation is usually good but not always practicable. This claim is fully demonstrated in the political field. Governors of all levels must take holistic views of the situation and make balanced decision in order to avoid mistakes; innovative ideas alone cannot justify their practicability and goodwill to others. For instance, when we look back, the development of plastic industry has resulted in great loss in the global ecosystem. Thus we see the disastrous consequences of carrying out such innovative yet premature ideas.

Hence, it is necessary for the groups to assess, remedy, and conclude the value and use of innovative ideas. All innovative ideas should be brought to discussions. With the clash of skeptical attitude of others to the advocating behavior of the thinker, fallacies made in a haste can be easily found and eliminated, which rectifies, sometimes supplements the idea. I don't agree with the speaker on his/her judgment of group work as compromising, weakening and conventionalizing innovation. Group work promotes those justified and useful innovative ideas and rejects those invalid, sometimes dangerous ones, as we see the case between father and son, in a chemistry lab, in all nations around the world. Only after the group censorship can the innovative ideas be carried out and benefit people, and this is the time when its innovativeness is fully appreciated.

In conclusion, I concede that most original ideas arise from individuals, yet I believe the group effort on these ideas should never be downplayed. It is the group that judge,reject or develop these ideas; this process is equally important with the innovative thinking.

GRE寫作：具體分類

1. 只分了大類，可操作性差。比如XDF的分類，總共就只有8個，但是光寫8篇作文又肯定是不夠的。這就需要我們每一類下面還要根據寫法和內容而具體分成各種小類，以達到一個小分類只寫一篇的目的。筆者在手頭資料的基礎上，總結出涵蓋了ISSUE全部題庫的23個小類。在復習的時候，大家最少只要寫20-23篇作文就可以完成ISSUE作文題庫全覆蓋的復習任務了，既放心又省力。

2. 分類中的題目描述過于啰嗦，不便于一眼看出題目的聯(lián)系。市面上GRE的復習材料已經這么多，在復習的時候我們應該更多地做減法。比如作文這里，既然在網上就能很方便地找到翻譯好的題庫，又何苦在每個分類里把雙語題目都打進去?但是只放題目，不放題號的話，又容易漏題出錯，更不利于復習。筆者的解決方案，是在大類上體現出這一類的共性，題號后面則用中文簡練地總結這一道題目的特性。

3. 分類不完整，或者題號有錯誤。這是最致命的錯誤。我最初在練習的時候，就隨便選了一個題庫，開始準備提綱。結果準備到一半，忽然發(fā)現分類題庫里有很重要的幾道高頻沒包括進來，又有幾道題由于題號錯誤而分錯了類。一怒之下，筆者對著ETS官網上的作文題庫編號一道一道地把手里的作文題號和題目對清楚。這絕對是市面上最完整的ISSUE作文分類，沒有之一!

分類開始：

近期長期

A.一舉成名 OR 踏實努力?

年輕人 51、71

先做后想 61

政府 19

研究者 129

B.經濟發(fā)展 VS 環(huán)境/文化藝術

法律保護保護區(qū) 10、125、148

瀕危物種 31、63、67

歷史遺跡 119

教育