1個(gè)月復(fù)習(xí)8分雅思經(jīng)驗(yàn)分享

1月復(fù)習(xí)8分雅思, 你還在等什么!今天小編給大家?guī)砹?月復(fù)習(xí)8分雅思，希望能夠幫助到大家，下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。

【雅思高分經(jīng)驗(yàn)】1月復(fù)習(xí)8分雅思 你還在等什么!

雅思成績(jī)：總分8分 聽力：8.5 閱讀 8 寫作 7 口語(yǔ) 7.5

因?yàn)檫€在念書 備考時(shí)間有限，只準(zhǔn)備了不到一個(gè)月的時(shí)間。但最后的結(jié)果還是比較滿意的，下面我就簡(jiǎn)短說一些每個(gè)部分的準(zhǔn)備工作：

1. 雅思閱讀

開始的時(shí)候每天堅(jiān)持嚴(yán)格按時(shí)間(18分鐘)完成一篇閱讀，自己嘗試了不同的閱讀方法，但最后感覺還是先讀題目再回原文定位的方法比較好用，回原文時(shí)我會(huì)通讀每一段，這樣做下前幾個(gè)題后基本文章也全部讀了一遍了，剩下的題目就會(huì)做得很快。但做題方法因人而異，建議多試試不同的方法，找到最適合自己的。

2. 雅思聽力

因?yàn)橹翱歼^托福，我覺得最好用的提升聽力能力的練習(xí)是聽寫---聽寫段落，可以用老托PART C93篇作為素材來練習(xí)，網(wǎng)上資源很好找。當(dāng)你練夠30篇時(shí)可以明顯感到一個(gè)質(zhì)的飛躍，這是打基礎(chǔ)，不要上來直接就做題。練過聽寫后再開始真正做劍橋雅思真題，一天一套，一定要注意拼寫，不然會(huì)很吃虧。

3. 雅思口語(yǔ)

因?yàn)槠綍r(shí)日常交流一直是英文，所以我沒有準(zhǔn)備口語(yǔ)，直接就去考了。不過如果你想練習(xí)的話，不妨從思維拓展上開始著手，隨便拿一個(gè)topic看看自己可不可以迅速有思路。還可以和烤鴨門組隊(duì)，沒事多講英文，口語(yǔ)就是要多說才會(huì)有感覺。

4. 雅思寫作

我在寫作上下的功夫最多，再加上身邊有寫作8分的朋友幫助，所以利用兩周重點(diǎn)突破。寫作的結(jié)構(gòu)非常重要!寫作不僅僅是在考察你的語(yǔ)言功底，更在考察你的邏輯思維能力，寫文章是否有條理，所以積累一些連詞并運(yùn)用很有必要!文章要經(jīng)得起推敲，是否有條理性，是否有因果關(guān)系，是否每句話都有它存在的道理。

千萬不要廢話，或者重復(fù)表達(dá)，每一個(gè)詞都很珍貴，把它用在解釋說明論證上。不要用中國(guó)人的思路含蓄表達(dá)，老外的思路很直白，開頭第一段就要明確給出寫這篇文章的目的，最好第一段最后一句話可以告訴考官接下來的論證點(diǎn)你具體要講什么。

還有就是一定要多看范文!積累高分范文的詞匯和遣詞造句，消化并變成自己的儲(chǔ)備?？捶段牟⒉皇钦f讀讀就好，而是要真的靜下心來，仔細(xì)研究為什么作者的結(jié)構(gòu)是這樣的，每句話間的邏輯關(guān)系是如何，文章是如何進(jìn)行的。再看多范文后，要好好練習(xí)并模仿，寫作要勤練，才會(huì)有感覺。

雅思寫作解題思路之是否需要學(xué)外語(yǔ)

Some people think all students should learn a foreign language. Others believe students without the talent should not learn. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

支持前者 所有人都應(yīng)該讀滿18 年的書

under the circumstance of globalisation, competition is becoming increasingly intense, and acquiring a foreign language skill help people to edge out, e.g. a Chinese who can speak fluent English is more hopefully to stand out during the recruitment of multinationals & many European people start learning Chinese because of the booming economy in China.

大學(xué)教育是為了就業(yè)還是其它(大學(xué)教育四大功能 ：知識(shí) ，實(shí)踐 ，素質(zhì) ，人際 );

教育應(yīng)該泛還是專

a good many societies have become diverse in culture, e.g. cosmopolitan cities, and learning other people’s language is beneficial to communication and achieving social harmony, e.g. a big proportion of American people choose to learn Spanish, especially in southwestern states. 大學(xué)教育是為了就業(yè)還是其它(大學(xué)教育四大功能：知識(shí)，實(shí)踐，素質(zhì)， 人際); 教育應(yīng)該泛還是專

mastering foreign languages enables people to deeply understand and truly appreciate different cultures, e.g. read Dream of the Red Mansion in Chinese and watching Shakespeare dramas. 大學(xué)教育是為了就業(yè)還是其它(大學(xué)教育四大功能：知識(shí)，實(shí)踐，素質(zhì)，人際); 教育應(yīng)該泛還是專

支持后者

to those who think people without such talent should not learn foreign languages, learning does not mean getting sophisticated in linguistics, obtaining the basic communication skills is widely adequate for most students. 教育應(yīng)該泛還是專(其他基礎(chǔ)學(xué)科也一樣，只是要求具備基本知識(shí)，沒說要很精通)

On the other hand, being capable of speaking and writing in other languages makes people more eloquent, and they will find making friends a lot easier, e.g. facebook. 大學(xué)教育是 為了就業(yè)還是其它(大學(xué)教育四大功能：知識(shí)，實(shí)踐，素質(zhì)，人際 ); 教育應(yīng)該 泛還是專

論據(jù)共享題

大學(xué)教育是為了就業(yè)還是其它

University should prepare students for employ or have other functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

所有人都應(yīng)該讀滿18年的書

Everybody should stay in school until 18. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

教育應(yīng)該泛還是專

Some people believe teenagers should concentrate on all school subjects. But, others believe they should focus on the subject that they are best at or that they find the most interesting. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

雅思寫作滿分范文之高學(xué)歷收入高

雅思寫作滿分范文：高學(xué)歷收入高

It is right that college graduates earn higher salaries than the less well-educated in the community. But they should also pay the full cost of their study. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Some conclude that college students should bear Idontknowl expenses for their higher learning on the generalization that college graduates usually receive higher salaries for similar jobs than those without a college degree. We can not deny that higher level of education, indeed, do associate with better income. Still, build on such fact alone, the conclusion remains questionable when more aspects are taken into consideration.

The whole argument in question rests on an assumption that it is always the case that people with higher education make more money than those less well-educated. But salary or income is, in most cases, based on contributions made by employees to companies or organizations in which they are employed. Statistics in the labor market indicate that people with professional training tend to find jobs easier than college graduates do and that blue-collar workers who do not hold college degrees are becoming the hotties in the labor market. Employers prefer to hire and pay more to highly skilled and specially trained people rather than fresh college graduates. In the auto industry, for instance, skilled technicians make two or three times more than their college educated counterparts who make the average salaries in other companies. And it is widely accepted that people’s income is determined more by talent, hard work, and willingness to take risks than solely by certain qualifications such as college education. Otherwise, the unemployment rate of college graduates would not be increasing every year and the rule of supply and demand will lose much of power in controlling the labor market. Admittedly in some knowledge extensive field such as research, teaching, and practice of law the labor force are primarily consists of highly educated professionals. But such people make up only a fraction of the labor market and are thus unrepresentative of the whole employment in general.

Considering the goal of education, we find that it is even more problematic for the country to throw all the responsibility of financing college education to college students. The goal of higher education of a nation is to improve and strengthen the general level of intellectual and professional capacity of its labor force, thereby increasing the competency of the nation in the global economy. As tax payers, parents all contributes to the education system and country in various ways. It is only reasonable and necessary that the country gives some forms of financially assistance to students to ease the burden of rising education costs. Such help should go to not only students from needy or impoverished families but also outstanding students from affluent backgrounds. Doing so can significantly boost the motivation of children from millions of families to engage in higher level of study. It is understandable that the general quality of people in a country will improve and its economy will benefit both now and in years to follow.

If the burden of supporting children’s higher education is dumped on parents and students, thousands of brilliant students will be deprived of chances to pursue their academic inspiration. Among those who suffer would definitely be future great scientists, business managers, artists and statesmen. The loss will be disastrous and irreversible.

In conclusion, the idea that students should also pay the full cost of their study is wrong and harmful because it is wrong to assume that higher education necessarily equalize high income. Moreover, it is in the best interest of a nation

to take responsibility in financing college education so that the goal of higher education will be better met.

雅思寫作解題思路之醫(yī)生護(hù)士教師與明星的收入

Sports and entertainment personalities have higher value than professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers in some societies, why this happened in some society and do you think it is a good or bad development.

原因

Psychologically, people, especially youngsters, need role models (榜樣) and sports and entertainment personalities can easily become those that are encouraging to ordinary people, e.g. the Chinese swimmer Sun Yang and famous band, e.g. the Tang Dynasty. 年輕 人崇拜娛樂和體育明星的利弊;體育的作用(體育激勵(lì)人心，提高全民素質(zhì) ); 舉辦奧運(yùn)會(huì)的利弊。

Some societies are highly commercialised and the intrinsic rule (內(nèi)在規(guī)則) of which is that the more distinctive an image becomes, the more irreplaceable value it gains (一個(gè)形象越 獨(dú)特，其不可替代的價(jià)值就越高), hence the high income, e.g. David Beckham, regardless of their actual contribution to the society.

好處

Entertainment stars can benefit the society through productions (作品) which deliver upbeat life attitude. And famous sports players can drive people’s zest for sport games, improving citizens’ overall fitness level. 年輕人崇拜娛樂和體育明星的利弊。

Many of them participate actively in charity works, which raises a positive profile for citizens.

年輕人崇拜娛樂和體育明星的利弊

壞處

Professional workers such as doctors, nurses and teachers have to go through endless tests and exammes to get qualifications, and their works largely benefit the society on people’s education and health. It appears to be unfair when comparing their salaries to the astronomical incomes of sports and entertainment celebrities.

Quite a few sports and entertainment personalities do not have sufficient education, and many of them misbehave, e.g. fight and swear, divorce and luxuriant lifestyle, etc. All of these are magnified (被放大) by the mass media which produces damaging effect to young

people who are vulnerable and imitate blindly. 年輕人崇拜娛樂和體育明星的利弊

論據(jù)共享題

年輕人崇拜娛樂和體育明星的利弊

Nowadays, young people are admiring media and sport stars even though they don’t set a good example. This brings negative effect to the society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

體育的作用

Some people think sports games are important for society, but others believe they should be taken as leisure activities. Discuss both these views and giver your own opinion.

舉辦奧運(yùn)會(huì)的利弊

Holding Olympic Games is an exciting event. Some people think it has positive effects while others argue it is a waste of money. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.