托福寫作分?jǐn)?shù)總是很低怎么辦

托福寫作備考中，很多同學(xué)感覺作文分?jǐn)?shù)一直不理想，但是也不知道該如何提升。其實(shí)托福寫作低分原因有很多，下面小編就和大家分托福寫作分?jǐn)?shù)總是很低怎么辦，希望能夠幫助到大家，來欣賞一下吧。

托福寫作分?jǐn)?shù)總是很低怎么辦?找到低分原因再根治

托福寫作低分原因分析一 基礎(chǔ)差

在托福寫作中，考卷中聽力和閱讀理解提供的內(nèi)容并不能為考生帶來靈感和詞匯補(bǔ)充。考生需要運(yùn)用自己平時(shí)積累下來的英語基本功來應(yīng)對(duì)。很多考生因?yàn)樵~匯語法的不熟悉，不能流暢并恰當(dāng)?shù)乇磉_(dá)自己的觀點(diǎn)，文章句子之間邏輯也堪稱混亂，更不談段落之間的銜接了。

解決方案：考生在備考托福寫作期間，首先要重視詞匯的積累，對(duì)于基礎(chǔ)薄弱的同學(xué)，建議從四級(jí)詞匯開始背誦記憶，然后逐步過渡到六級(jí)詞匯以及托福詞匯。在背誦詞匯的時(shí)候，大家一定要嚴(yán)格制定計(jì)劃表，有計(jì)劃有步驟完成分階段目標(biāo)。其實(shí)，考生要積累語法知識(shí)，比如被動(dòng)語態(tài)，非謂語動(dòng)詞，強(qiáng)調(diào)句型，從句等使用方法。

托福寫作低分原因分析二 思維習(xí)慣

因?yàn)橹形氖悄刚Z而非英語的原因，大多考生在學(xué)習(xí)英語時(shí)會(huì)不自覺運(yùn)用中式思維來表達(dá)自己的觀念，但批卷的并非中國(guó)人，考官其實(shí)并不明白考生實(shí)際要表達(dá)的含義。在這種情況下，考生很容易出現(xiàn)低分現(xiàn)象。

解決方案：這種情況下，朗閣托福老師建議，一定平時(shí)要多聽多看，不一定是教科書或者機(jī)經(jīng)。更可以參加經(jīng)典英美劇。比如《生活大爆炸》，《老友記》等，或者一些美國(guó)好萊塢電影來增強(qiáng)自己對(duì)純英語語境的熟悉和感知能力，提升自己的英式英文的語感。

托福寫作低分原因分析三 寫作套路

很多考生在備考期間，學(xué)習(xí)和背誦模板。在考試時(shí)，會(huì)嘗試生搬硬套來嵌入模板套路。不可否認(rèn)模板很經(jīng)典和實(shí)用，但正是如此，很多考生都在學(xué)習(xí)，結(jié)果就是考官會(huì)看到千篇一律的句式以及邏輯，極大降低了自己作文的閃光點(diǎn)和突出性。

解決方案：建議考生在備考托福階段，每天自行用英語寫作，可以針對(duì)某事某人寫作，也可以直接每天寫日記，在日常的寫作中，要有意識(shí)運(yùn)用自己學(xué)到的新句式和自己摘抄收集的美麗句式。

托?？荚囎魑莫?dú)立寫作范文：假期少但是有趣有挑戰(zhàn)性的工作的利

Which do you prefer with the same rate of pay, an interesting and challenging job with less vacation or a job with more vacation time but less fun? 2016.5.7 ML

An interesting and challenging job with less vacation or a boring job with more vacation, which one is better.

點(diǎn)睛

題目大意：一個(gè)假期少但是有趣有挑戰(zhàn)性的工作和一個(gè)假期多無聊的工作，哪個(gè)更好。 此題是一道比較類的題目，而且發(fā)現(xiàn)兩個(gè)種工作各有利弊，所以波波建議，用取決于的觀點(diǎn)來寫，即認(rèn)為那種工作好取決于人們的年齡，對(duì)于年齡大的人來說后者好，對(duì)于年輕人來說，前者好。

托福寫作模板及參考答案：

寫作參考一:

The next two months will witness the graduation of a huge number of college students in China, triggering an urgent issue whether it is better to seek an interesting and challenging job with less vacation than finding those jobs with more vacation but less fun. From my perspective, a challenging and interesting job matters more.

For one thing, mentally challenging jobs can keep employees’ mind sharp even long after retirement. To put it more specific, even a mentally demanding job may stress workers out today; it can provide important benefits after retirement. “Based on data spanning 18 years, a study suggests certain kinds of challenging jobs have the potential to enhance and protect workers’ mental functioning in later life,” said by Gwenith Fisher, a faculty associate at the University of Michigan Institute for Social Research. The research analyzed data on 4,182 participants in the U-M Health and Retirement Study, which surveys a representative sample of more than 20,000 older Americans every two years and the final result reveals people who had worked in jobs with greater mental demands were more likely to have better memories before they retired and more likely to have slower declines in memory after retiring than people who had worked in jobs with fewer mental demands. Accordingly, being engaged in a challenging and interesting job will benefit employees’ mental functioning.

For another thing, the more challenging the job is, the higher salaries employees will be paid with. Generally speaking, a challenging job will require employees to master multiple capabilities and techniques and to undertake more responsibilities. Thus, they will be paid with high salaries, making it possible for them to do whatever stirs up their interest. For instance, one of my friends named Jason works as a top software engineer in a renewed IT company in China and he is well paid. Besides, his hobby is photography and travel in foreign countries. On weekends or public holidays he often chooses to take photographs in different places of historic interest and scenic beauty or travel abroad. In the near two years, he has traveled in many countries in Europe and Southeast Asia and take a lot of beautiful pictures. Obviously, compared with average citizens in big cities who are busy in dealing with a variety of problems in daily lives, Jason’s life experience can tell us that his high-paid job gives him chances to live a more leisure life during vacation.

Admittedly, if people choose to take a less-fun job with more vacation, they can spend more time with their families and doing what they like. In this way, they will live a less-pressure life. However, from what I believe, people should try their best to play to their strengths and talents on the career path especially when they are young and a challenging job will require employees to be fully devoted.

To conclude, a challenging job with less vacation is superior to a job with more vacation but less fun.

寫作參考二:

In the current society full of fierce competition, we can readily observe that landing an ideal job has become increasingly difficult, which forces us to a concession in the requirement of the job we want. When it comes to which is more appealing, an interesting job with less holiday or the boring one with more vacation, people varying in backgrounds and personalities may view the same issue from different angles. From my perspective, the issue should be analyzed case by case.

On the one hand, choosing a challenging job with less vacation is a wise move for the young. As we know, the defining characteristic of young adults is the degree to which they are endowed with lofty ambition and never fear any challenges. As a result, challenges accompanying the work will help young people to tap their potential capability and thus achieve greater success. For another, less spare time is not a big deal for the young, because they are so energetic and vigorous that a sound sleep can help them to restore their vitality. A good case in point is the experience my friend, Andy. As a broker in an Stock Exchange Company in Beijing, he has to deal with large quantities of data and keep close track of any events which may cause the fluctuation of stock price. Although the heavy pressure brought by his job often require him to work overtime and even around the clock, he never makes complaints because the exciting and adventurous experience from selling or buying stocks appeals him a lot.

On the other hand, older people prefer to select the relatively boring job with more leisure time. For one thing, boring jobs means that employees have to accomplish the same tasks again and again so that there is less pressure and stress, which is very important to the health of older people. As is common sense, the senior are more susceptible to various diseases such as hypertension and heart attack due to the weakening immune system. Consequently, any additional stress from work may pose a serious threat to their physical well-being. Also, older people are usually those who have got married or even have children, so spending more time accompanying their family members is of great significance. Undoubtedly, the job with more vacation can better satisfy the need of staying longer with their kids or spouse. During the stay, the emotional bond between them will become closer and more intimate.

Judging from what has been discussed above, we can draw the conclusion that it depends on the age group of people whether the interesting job with less vacation is better than the monotonous one with more holiday.

寫作參考三:

Should people choose to do challenging jobs with less vacation? Or should they get involved in tedious jobs that offer more off days? I lean towards the latter choice.

Indeed, challenging jobs seem good for modern people, since the essence of those jobs can motivate employees and make them feel they are valued and respected. Is it really worth it, however, to put what other people think of them in priority at the expense of a more comfortable work style and more vacation? Drinking a Margarita on the beach in Hawaii or feeling the breeze on the Seine is all it takes for one to choose a job with longer vacation but less fun.

Longer vacation provides people with unparalleled relaxation. Modern people are tortured by heavy workload in all walks of life, ranging from common office workers to corporate bosses. What they need is nothing but a long vacation far away from daily chores. When seeing sun rising from the horizon, appreciating the grandness of pyramids, or smelling the fragrance of lavender in Provence, one would definitely take his minds off whatever bothers him in work. Some people will say that shorter vacation can serve the same purpose in terms of relaxation. But shorter vacation like a day or two days off is far from enough for employees to get a thorough refreshment. Without enough relaxation, employees are less likely to feel satisfied towards their life, let alone be concentrated on work itself.

Challenging jobs are not wise choices not only because they offer less vacation but also because such jobs tend to make employees overexert themselves. Interesting as it may seem, a challenging job put workers in a situation where they have to fight for their career security considering the myriad competitors. In sales field, which is commonly considered as quite challenging, it is not rare to work extended hours or even on weekends to follow potential customers. Thus they are often haunted by endless mental stress. In contrast, a job that is less fun may give people a monotonous life, but they are less susceptible to unexpected employment and less pressure, which compromises the monotony thing after all.

All in all, people should try to take various factors into consideration when choosing their jobs. When a job’s entertaining and challenging nature conflicts with vacation it could offer, I go with the latter.

托?？荚囎魑莫?dú)立寫作范文：政府保護(hù)自然環(huán)境應(yīng)采取什么措施

What is the most important action for the government to take for the protection of environmental problems? Fund researches on new energy sources such as solar and wind power? Protect forests and natural wildlife species? Pass and enforce laws to reduce the pollution.

三選一類題目會(huì)給出三個(gè)選項(xiàng)A, B, C讓學(xué)生去選擇一個(gè)。這種題的答題方法為開頭段-正文段第一段B好-正文段第二段B的另一個(gè)優(yōu)點(diǎn)-正文段第三段B比A好/A的缺點(diǎn)和B比C好/C的缺點(diǎn)-結(jié)尾段。

What one of the following is the most important action for the government to take for the protection of natural environment?

(1)fund research on new energy sources such as solar and wind power;

(2)preserve natural places such as forests and natural wildlife species.

(3)pass and enforce laws to reduce the pollution produced by companies and industries

點(diǎn)睛：

題目大意：對(duì)政府來說，要想保護(hù)自然環(huán)境，政府最應(yīng)該采取哪項(xiàng)措施：資助研究新能源，保護(hù)棲息地和動(dòng)物，制定法規(guī)來減少公司的污染排放。 此題目為三選一的題目，波波提醒各位小伙伴，對(duì)于這樣的題目，我們有兩點(diǎn)要做到：1.必須要清楚選出一個(gè)選項(xiàng)，2.三個(gè)選項(xiàng)在整篇文章論述中務(wù)必都要提到。只要能做到上述兩點(diǎn)即可，所以三選一題目的寫作結(jié)構(gòu)非常靈活，下面是波波選擇的一種寫法，僅供參考。

范文參考一:

Taking a panoromic view of human history, we can readily find that the natural environment plays an enormously important role in determing the future of each and every country. Given the great significance of clean environment, the general public as well as the governors begin to wonder which is the most essential action to protect the environment, among funding new energy research, preserving natural habitat or enacting strict laws. Towards such a long-running tug-of-war, I am inclined to argue that national governments should invest financial support in developing new energy sources.

Initially, spending more money in discovering new energy can radically solve the various environmental problems. As is common sense, the deteriorating environment is the result of the overexploitation of fossil fuels, including coal, oil and natural gas. To be specific, numerous chemical plants usually burn the coal to provide power for manufacturing all kinds of goods designed to satisfy the basic needs of the general public. As a result, a large amounts of industrial wastes are discharged to take a toll on the natural environment. Also, an increasing number of petrol-powered automobiles will definitely emit car exhause(e.g. fumes and toxic gas), which can increase the likelihood of the public suffering from respiratory diseases. All the above problems related to environment can be resolved by find new and clean energy like solar energy, wind power and tidal power. Undoubtedly, replacing the traditional energy with the new ones can dramatically decrease the pollution and contamination, thus leading to a better living environment. For example, once the cars uses the electricity instead of petrol, the air quality will improve to a large extent.

Secondly, there are conspicuous limitation of the other two options. As for preserving natural places, the effect of this practice is relatively restricted. To illustrate, the traditional energy sources are usually exploited and discovered in the natural places. Consequently, the preservation of natural places will hinder the access to various energy and thus impede the progress of the whole society. Also, the same logic applies to passing laws to reduce pollution. It is an indisputable fact that across the globe, many countries now are heaviely dependent on the industries and factories which produce pollutions. In other words, once the law of punishing these companies is enforced, these corporation may have to cut down their output and make less profits, even ending up going bankcrupt. Accordingly, the national economy and the living standard of the public will suffer too.

Factoring what has been discussed above, we can conclude that funding research of environmental friendly energy will be more preferable, because finding proper alternative energy is the key to solving the environmental problems comprehensively.

寫作參考二:

The statement above attempts to assert whether funding on environmental friendly resources, preserving wildlife species, or enforcing laws to be the most crucial way to protect the environment has long been centered in dispute. Too often people hold the idea inventing new energy resources and passing laws could be effective ways to eradicate environmental related issues. However, as far as I am concerned protecting plants and animals would be a much more direct and sufficient solution.

To the extent that species extinction is the result of anthropogenic events such as direct or indirect human activities and further threaten the delicate balance which all animal including human beings depend upon. Thus protecting the forests and natural wildlife species has the priority to be dealt with. For example, the extinction of the dodo, a flightless bird endemic to the Indian Ocean island of Mauritius, was directly attributable to human activity. As the nature is an intricate matrix of interdependent relationships, in which each species depends on many others for its survival, the dying out of Dodo caused a certain native tree whose seeds dispersed by Dodo, extinct either. Nowadays, many species face the similar circumstance either and it greatly results in human being’s greedy. To make mechanic profit, the underground dealers trade the skin of the Siberian Tiger, and horn of the Tibetan Antelope and the African Elephant, making those animals hardly ensure the preservation. For protecting the balanced ecosystem, human beings should place a very high affirmative duty to protect wildlife species.

In addition, many species possess great values to human race, some of which are not realized by human yet, requiring people to protect them without any effort. Thermal insulation and conductive resistance enables latex, extracting from the rubber tree, to be the essential component of industrial products for daily uses, such as rubber gloves and rubber sheath. Not only plants play an important role in industrial field, but works for medical perspective as well, especially function as Chinese herbal medicine. For instance, marijuana provides relief from pain and Lianqiao helps with heat removing. If cutting down most of the rubber trees and herbal species, we will leave limited resources for our future generation. For the reason above, it is essential for human beings contribute more on wildlife species protection to handle environmental resources shortage problems.

Admittedly, allocate money on new energy and pass laws to reduce pollution have the merit, however, they are impractical. Take spending on natural energy as an example. On the one threshold, with the technology we have now, the energy sources are not stable and even costly. Wind and solar energy cannot be obtained on a calm and cloudy day. On the other one, they cost the country a lot. I do not deny that wind and solar energy, cleaner energy as they are, would be a wiser choice for developed counties who have money and resources to solve the carbine dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and toxic gases relevant problems and to a great extend release environmental pressure, such as global warming jeopardy. However, when it comes to developing countries, poverty, higher unemployment rate, and high inflation are all problems that developing countries need to worry about. The better solution is to encourage factories to produce more goods and services. To cut down the costs, it is inevitable to produce air and water pollutions. Passing laws and inventing impede the economic growth on a large scale.

In sum, considering the financial and practical analyzing, it is safe to conclude that preserve wildlife species is the most important action to protect the natural environment rather than creating new energy and enforcing laws.

托福寫作分?jǐn)?shù)總是很低怎么辦相關(guān)文章：

★ 雅思成績(jī)?cè)趪?guó)內(nèi)有什么作用