這些GRE寫作誤區(qū)一定要謹慎
在GRE寫過備考過程中相必大家都遇到過一些棘手的問題吧，其中不乏有一些是因為不小心走進GRE寫作誤區(qū)才導(dǎo)致的gre寫作低分，下面小編就和大家分享這些GRE寫作誤區(qū)一定要謹慎,希望能夠幫助到大家，來欣賞一下吧。
這些GRE寫作誤區(qū)一定要謹慎
誤區(qū)一、無意義和功能的“廢話”
考生在GRE寫作中經(jīng)常會寫出這樣一類句子。它不是闡述理由的觀點句，在文章中沒有任何功能性且無意義，只是對自己將要論述的話題做一個宣告。即沒有作者的觀點和態(tài)度，也不知道作者要從哪個方向去寫。比如：“The subject of this essay is purpose of schooling.”或“I would like to write about the causes and solutions of juvenile delinquency.”這類句子不能出現(xiàn)在主體段做論點，也不適合做GRE寫作的話題引入。
誤區(qū)二、觀點過于寬泛
在各類教導(dǎo)寫作的材料中，大家應(yīng)該時常會發(fā)現(xiàn)關(guān)于強調(diào)GRE寫作論點一定要寫的具體，越細越好的指導(dǎo)建議。而考生經(jīng)常出現(xiàn)的問題就是會出現(xiàn)一些很寬泛的論點句，gre寫作能力,gre備考要多久以至于在較短的篇幅里并不能充分展開，甚至有時候會造成觀點重疊。比如：“Mobile phones have changed our life greatly. ”這句只是說手機很大程度上改變了人們的生活，但是并未點明從哪些方面上帶來了改變，因此把這個觀點具化一下：“Mobile phones can serve as a connection to the Internet， which can be extremely convenient for obtaining information wherever you may be.”再比如：“Advertising has bad effects on all of society. ”這一句說廣告有不良影響，我們需要寫出具體的方面“Advertisements which exaggerate the function of the products may mislead the consumers.”
誤區(qū)三、論點狹窄無展開
第三種誤區(qū)，與第二種誤區(qū)相反，有寫考生的GRE寫作論點寫的過于狹窄以至于沒有展開的空間甚至沒有進一步支持的必要。這類句子與其說是觀點，倒不如說是事實的陳述或者只是舉了個例子而已。比如：“There are more local residents engaged in tourism industry. ”這句陳述了一個事實就是在當?shù)卦絹碓蕉嗳碎_始從事旅游業(yè)，并非觀點，可改為：“Tourism brings huge economic benefits to local residents.”再比如：“The consumption of fossil fuels increase in recent years. ”這句說化石燃料的消費近年來有增長，需給出論述重點，假設(shè)我們要論述原因：“The consumption of fossil fuels increasing in recent years results from two factors.”
誤區(qū)四、一個論點句中包含兩個或多個主題
這種現(xiàn)象在讓步段的寫作中尤為明顯，讓步段寫作要求針對反方一個論點進行反駁論述。如果反方觀點或反駁論點出現(xiàn)這種多主題情況，很容易讓文章失去統(tǒng)一性和連貫性，從而導(dǎo)致邏輯不清，扣分嚴重。
GRE寫作高分范文：法律
題目：
It is possible to pass laws that control or place limits on people's behavior, but legislation cannot reform human nature. Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts and minds.
通過法律可以控制或者限制人們的行為，但是立法是無法改變?nèi)祟惐拘缘?。法律無法改變?nèi)藗兊母星楹退枷搿?/p>
GRE寫作范文：
Ever since the Code of Hammurapi comes into being, laws have begun to put restrictions on people's behaviors and have played an important role in the maintenance of social order. But aside from its impact on shaping public deportment, legislation is of no avail to reform human nature as well as mankind thoughts.
Our collective life experience is that we make choices and decisions every day--under a legal system. No one is ever granted the rights to surpass the boundary of laws; otherwise there may be lack of protection for private property and personal right from being violated. Common sense tells us that the laws will punish the wrongdoers severely sometimes so harshly even to sentence the felons to death. It is the awe to controlling authority as well as the fear of castigation that made most of the people away from the illicit behaviors. Laws, for better or worse, have put up a paradigm on which people abide by, for the sake of personal interests and the social stability as well.
Laws can exert their influences on people’s “hands and legs”, but when it comes to man’s hearts and minds, it cannot. In the long history of its development, laws change over time and vary from region to region not to alter human nature but to be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times and places. The end of a legal system impels laws to evolve to keep pace with changing mores, customers, and our collective sense of equity but with little concern for the reconstruction of human thoughts. Bigamy, to be commonly regarded as illegal in most countries, is yet legitimate in some Arabian countries. For Islamic, outlawing bigamy seems an impinge upon their religious freedom of choosing mates. Instead of bringing about a revolution in the conception of marriage among Islamic disciples, laws give way to the entrenched customers. Still more, from the psychotic analysis angle, that laws will change nature is further doubted. Sigmund Freud has divided the individual personality into threefold: the id, the ego and the super ego. The ego, as the surface of the nature and the part you show the world, is governed by the "reality principle," otherwise known as laws.
However, so powerless are laws to extend its impacts on the id and the superego remains below, each has its own significant effects on the personality. A rapist, for example, despite years of imprisonment may still relapse into outrages in that laws fail to civilize the id desires composing of instinctual drives. By no means can laws alone alter our nature. Were laws by itself be able to cause a change in the human nature and exercise a fundamental influence on people's hearts and minds, then it would probably be no need for its existence. People at no time can ever have imagined this.
In fact, to truly change the human nature, it is through the synergic efforts associating the education, moral and ethic social interactions altogether that brought about a reconstruction of human nature.
In conclusion, in spite the fact that we may live in a harmonious society with the implementation of the laws, it seems unthinkable for laws to undertake the role as a reformer in rebuilding man's nature as well as hearts and minds.
GRE寫作高分范文：想法付諸行動的困難
GRE寫作題目：
Practicality is now our great idol, which all powers and talents must serve.Anything that is not obviously practical has little value in today's world.
GRE寫作正文：
In today’s society idealism seems to become an ideology that is marginalized and practicality is our great idol, thus, the speaker asserts that anything that is not practical bears little value. I admit that being practical is the wide-accepted dogma in order to survive in this world, but by going too far to claim that anything that is not practical has little value is against the empirical observation as well as the general stimulus that push the human society forward.
Admittedly, practicality has become a cult in today’s society. Too often do we hear people talk about being practical whenever they come to make important decisions or choose between several alternatives. The deep-rooted cause underlying this phenomenon is that with the development of modern society, the emphasis is placed more on financial gaining, quick fame, sensible choice and so forth. Our society is rather stable compared with that of the last century when war, violence, human right movements has become the symbol of that period. People are enjoying this peaceful environment with less crucial missions rested upon them and as a result, they shift from idealism to struggle for the common well being of mankind to the practical concept of individual achievement.
This ideology has its merits since after all the disaster and upheaval that our human race has undergone, it is judicious to focus on the economic aspect of things in order to tackle the most important social problems such as poverty, hunger and environmental problems which all deserve us to sit down and work out practical solutions. On the personal level, being practical is how a person would possibly succeed in his career or personal life. One is likely to make sensible decisions for his education and job choice on the basis of practical consideration of his own strength and weakness and careful analysis of the prospect of research direction and job market. Even those in power and intellects need to consider practically since hasty decision built upon pure ideal meditation would hardly find its way in the modern society and is doom to failure.
Agreeing with the speaker that practicality has become the great idol in our society, I am strongly against his point that anything that is not practical has little value. Even in today’s society, idealism is by no means relegated to the place of total neglect and disregard. For one thing, in history, so much achievement is the outcome of several generations’ struggle such as fighting for equality for women, human rights movement,etc. In today’s society, practicality is the way we can obtain our goal but idealism offers the philosophical explanation of why we should set this as our goal and the clear the ultimate value of our pursuing. What is more, by totally fixed one's eyes upon the practical aspect of things, we face the danger of neglecting one important part of our pursuit, that is the mental enjoyment brought out by idealism. If we have a clear goal set in mind and put practical endeavor at the same time, the result would be more satisfactory and valuable.
To sum up, I agree with the speaker insofar as the wide acceptance of practicality is considered. Being practical is the tenet of modern society and it does shed light on the wise way of doing things and obtaining goals, no matter in the personal or social level.But the speaker goes too far by claiming that it is the only valuable ideology in society.I am strongly against this idea since in history or at present, we human beings still need the philosophical explanation to clear our goal and to provide motivation. In this aspect, idealism would never be replaced with pure practical consideration. Otherwise,human society will be replete with insensible people directed by economic profit and quick fame and recognition.
這些GRE寫作誤區(qū)一定要謹慎相關(guān)文章：
上一篇：GRE寫作你需要知道這幾點
下一篇：gre寫作細節(jié)要把握好
