GRE寫作怎樣保證原創(chuàng)度

GRE寫作怎樣保證原創(chuàng)度?實(shí)用方法技巧解讀，下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。

GRE寫作怎樣保證原創(chuàng)度?實(shí)用方法技巧解讀

1.GRE作文觀點(diǎn)要有洞察力和原創(chuàng)特色

觀點(diǎn)是GRE作文考試的核心內(nèi)容，考察考生能否對(duì)一個(gè)issue進(jìn)行深入分析與思考并最終提出一個(gè)有層次的觀點(diǎn)。有了原創(chuàng)觀點(diǎn)就不用擔(dān)心雷同。我這樣說也許有有點(diǎn)像讓快餓死的人去吃肉粥。如果真的要借鑒范文觀點(diǎn)，我建議應(yīng)該盡可能做一些調(diào)整，以避免第二個(gè)雷區(qū)?；蛘吒纱嘣谖闹兄v明這個(gè)思路是借鑒了哪一本參考書的。美國(guó)人對(duì)真小人比對(duì)偽君子要寬容。

2.GRE寫作照抄原文是禁止事項(xiàng)

在語言上可以使用一些范文的句式，但是絕對(duì)不能照抄原文，而是要換掉一些關(guān)鍵詞?；蛘呷绻栌藐P(guān)鍵詞，則必須使用別的句式。

3.文章結(jié)構(gòu)可以進(jìn)行借鑒和專用

比如把北美范文用在120題的結(jié)構(gòu)和破題策略用在210題上。

4.范文中的例句仍然可以引用

在例證方面，使用范文用過的例證沒有問題，哪怕用那些被判雷同的例證也沒問題。例證是人類的共同知識(shí)，誰都可以使用，關(guān)鍵是我們不能用和范文作者同樣的思路和語言來詮釋例證并展開類似的論證。

因此，越是耳熟能詳?shù)睦C如牛頓與蘋果樹、愛迪生孵蛋，要寫出原創(chuàng)的內(nèi)容就越困難，雷同的危險(xiǎn)就越大。

綜上，要想根本避免GRE作文雷同情況發(fā)生，我們一方面可以在政策允許的范圍內(nèi)對(duì)范文進(jìn)行合法、合理的使用，另一方面更要積極培養(yǎng)我們自己的獨(dú)立思考能力，從根本上解決雷同問題，避免因雷同而被取消成績(jī)。 這就需要考生有自己的思想、自己的例證和自己的語言，各位考生盡量不要照抄范文，而是自己來寫。

讓你的GRE寫作獨(dú)一無二

首先你要做的是，避免臨陣磨槍。如果到GRE考試在即，再去學(xué)習(xí)GRE寫作范文，這樣做雖然會(huì)使你創(chuàng)作的框架上與范文相似，但僅僅是做到了形似而神不似。這樣的寫作緊緊停留在臨摹而不是創(chuàng)作階段，這樣創(chuàng)作的文章只是表面唬人，但實(shí)際只是“紙老虎”，沒有自己的中心思想，也抓不住題目的意義以及對(duì)考題透徹的分析。所以，應(yīng)該在學(xué)習(xí)模板的同時(shí)創(chuàng)造出屬于自己的寫作模板。

其次你要做到提高自己的詞匯量。不同的英語詞匯有時(shí)會(huì)表達(dá)相同的意思，但是在文章中起的作用大不相同，一篇文章中你使用的是否是高階詞匯，是不是句型多變都決定了你作文的得分。你創(chuàng)作文章使用的詞匯不一定要多華麗，重在變幻，讀你的作文要像坐過山車，柳暗花明又一村。

最后善用模板，不斷練習(xí)。模板的使用，可以使你在GRE作文考試中，迅速了解考題，并且根據(jù)自己的模板，構(gòu)建自己的作文結(jié)構(gòu)，但是這種結(jié)構(gòu)并不是適用于任何文章。這是需要你去合理調(diào)配。有了作文的結(jié)構(gòu)，僅僅只是框架，你需要填充自己的靈魂，即自己的中心思想，而中心思想是靠自己不斷的總結(jié)，各種知識(shí)在你腦海的沉淀，只有有閱歷的人才可以寫出內(nèi)涵豐富的文章。

新GRE考試issue寫作范文：權(quán)威問題

新GRE考試issue寫作范文：權(quán)威問題

Much of the information that people assume is‘factual’actually turns out to be inaccurate. Thus，any piece of information referred to as a‘fact’should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future.

大多數(shù)人們認(rèn)為是事實(shí)的信息結(jié)果實(shí)際上都是不準(zhǔn)確的。因此，任何據(jù)稱是事實(shí)的信息都應(yīng)該被質(zhì)疑，因?yàn)樗趯砗芸赡軙?huì)被證明為是錯(cuò)誤的。中華考試網(wǎng)(www.Examw。com)

GRE寫作范文：

Should we be doubtful to all the information at hands because the rightness of which is uncertain? The speaker claims so，I concede that people often commit various fallacies in the course of cognizing things，however I fundamentally take exception of the arguer's assertion to mistrust every fact we might encounter. And I will substantially discuss my views thereinafter.

To begin with，the speaker seems to implicate that a fact would be proven false in the future under numerous circumstance. Nevertheless I prefer to arguer that facts never change. No matter how did the Medieval Church and Inquisition persecute Bruno，the fact never changes that the earth is far from being the center of the universe as the religious sovereigns had assumed or hoped for，while just a minor particle in it. Equally，no matter how Edison had tried to incite the public fear and distrust to the alternative current electricity，the fact never changes that Teals’ electrical system is vastly superior to his direct current electrical one，and would be accepted and applied in larger range.

However，what do change are the human's objective interpretations to facts. One compelling argument to this point is that，due to the limitation of human’s knowledge and comprehensive capability，they tend to make insufficient or even false understanding to the certain fact. An apt illustration is the changes of cognition to disease. While at the ancient time，our progenitors believed the a man becoming a patient for the reason that he had conduct crimes or offended some ghosts or spirits，the contemporary people have well know that the varies of pathogens are the basic causes to our diseases，and the defects of our immune system and so forth are also the factors as well. Another argument for the change of comprehension to fact is that different people always observe and interpret from different perspectives. Though the Relativity theory is not well compliable with the Quantum mechanism，no one call the greatness of both Einstein and Bohr，because their theories are based on distinct views，the former from the macrocosm and the later from the microcosm.

Notwithstanding the foregoing reasons for that human tend to make fallacies during the cause of comprehending and cognizing facts，these reasons should never be the excuses to doubt every conclusion we might draw from facts. Based on certain rational inference and proper knowledge fundament，the conclusions we make might well be justifiable，if not completely right，to certain degree. What we need to do is to promote the enterprise of pursuing the better answer and try to use the result we have get to application，instead of wasting our time to undue doubt and suspicion. Though the medical scientists have not fully understood the mechanism of how the does the implanted organ interact with the wounded body，they are not refrain from using the implanting skill to save patients，of course the precondition or which is that this technology is much well established than the fundamental theory.

To sum up，while I advocate the speaker's opinion that it is inevitable for human to comprehend facts inaccurately，for the reason of the limitation of the abilities，I essentially disagree with his assertion that facts will continually alter themselves，as well as his recommendation to discredit any piece of fact. In the final analysis，I would arguer once more that facts never change and although the misunderstanding to them is inevitable，we should not defer ourselves from the pursuit to fully comprehending them.

GRE寫作怎樣保證原創(chuàng)度相關(guān)文章：