GRE寫作：列提綱的注意事項(xiàng)
GRE寫作如何列提綱，列提綱又有怎樣的注意事項(xiàng)呢?今天小編給大家?guī)鞧RE寫作：列提綱的注意事項(xiàng)，希望能夠幫助到大家，下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。
GRE寫作：列提綱的注意事項(xiàng)
第一，穩(wěn)定軍心。
第二，層次清晰。
如果碰到了以前有過提綱的那最好了，如果沒有，現(xiàn)場(chǎng)列了總歸比沒有的要好吧。列出了提綱，無論怎么樣，都要讓文章看起來有個(gè)系統(tǒng)，有個(gè)層次，有個(gè)邏輯順序。主要的作用就是以上兩點(diǎn)。所以我以為給作文列提綱是非常必要和值得的。所謂的四兩拔千金，可以很好的解釋這個(gè)原理。
再討論到如何實(shí)踐的問題。有人會(huì)說自己連文章都寫不完，哪來多余的寫提綱?
1、什么時(shí)候開始練習(xí)在模考時(shí)加入提綱?
比較適合的是在最后10天到一周的樣子。因?yàn)檫@首先需要在一定高強(qiáng)度的寫作練習(xí)之后，再者，需要對(duì)題目已經(jīng)有了一定的把握。很多的提綱在之前都大體列過。然后在限時(shí)中加入提綱的寫作。
2、用多長(zhǎng)時(shí)間列提綱?
我的經(jīng)驗(yàn)是ISSUE總體比ARGU短。ISSUE大體要2-3分鐘，ARGU怎么都要3分鐘?？赡芤?分鐘。
3、提綱里都要包含些什么?
對(duì)ISSUE來說，讀第一遍題目時(shí)把關(guān)鍵詞提出來，接著將核心話題列出來，根據(jù)這個(gè)話題開始一條一條列出你要寫的東西;ARGU來說，因?yàn)轭}目比較長(zhǎng)，所以讀題的時(shí)間就要比前者長(zhǎng)。
第一遍建議先把每一個(gè)意群講的是什么簡(jiǎn)要提出來，排上序號(hào);第二從這些小短句分析其文章結(jié)構(gòu)和主要錯(cuò)誤;第三把自己對(duì)錯(cuò)誤的闡述順序列出來。這樣差不多是可以的了。
4、列提綱的一些技巧
需要在練習(xí)中找到自己的記錄法，哪種縮寫是自己看得明了的。要記出來的摘要最后自己還要辨析幾分鐘。建議在平時(shí)列提綱的時(shí)候就有意識(shí)的做一下限定時(shí)間練習(xí)，看2-3分鐘能不能把大體的框架列出來。
其他：我覺得如果正確掌握提綱的寫法和時(shí)間分配問題，將是對(duì)于AW的核心實(shí)力的一種提高。對(duì)比于其他人，無論如何都是要略勝一籌的。
GRE寫作滿分范文賞析
"Our declining environment may bring the people of the world together as no politician, philosopher, or war ever could. Environmental problems are global in scope and respect no nation's boundaries. Therefore, people are faced with the choice of unity and cooperation on the one hand or disunity and a common tragedy on the other."
At no other time then in our present time has the need for unity and togetherness been more necessary to the inhabitants on our planet. For many decades the motto has been one of waste and denial. The world is in a race - racing to become number one - racing to destroy the earth. Traditions of protecting the earth have been abandoned as the need to satisfy infantile needs and desires wins out over the more philosophical desires of thought and meaning. Unfortunately many do not see the need for reforms in actions and thought; people are living for today and not tomorrow. Those that can believe in a future, and exhibit a desire to make a difference in this future must find a way to influence the remaining masses, and often it seems that the world simply refused to listen or learn from its past mistakes.
Those that answer this calling will not do so for notiority, but instead for their beliefs that they can make a difference. They will need to be of strong heart, body, soul, and beliefs. Understanding the need for an overhaul in our system in the rampant abuses is the first step to obtaining advancement in the struggle to bring the world together in a way that will benefit mankind today and tomorrow.
For too many years American's have persuaded themselves that the envirnoment was in no danger. Every year laws have been passed to protect our land, animals, and even our people. More often than not there are loopholes in these laws, allowing the environment to remain in peril. It seems that we often forget that we are not the only ones on earth. We are only a small percentage, and much too often our actions have a great effect on those that must subsist on this earth as well. One threatening example of this is the depletion of the rain forests in the Central and South Americas. It seems difficult for Americans to understand how these people can destroy their natural landscapes. Not only is the landscaped destroyed and the invaluable plants and animal life are also destroyed, and these can never be recovered. Americans express their annoyance at such practices, failing to see that we as consumers are one of the main causes of such actions. As a consumer society we depend on wood and other materials from these areas. Unfortunately these areas are nothing like what we see at home, instead it is a world of unimaginable poverty and harshness. In these areas where poverty is so prevalent often the only means of survival is found through the clearing of the precious rain forest for farm land. Certainly the fact that these people are farming in order to maintain their survival is important and can not be over looked. Yet, in most cases the farming is not done as a means of raising food and livestock for their own uses. This land is usually used to grow food for other countries such as America. This scenario depicts the wickedness that has become of our world. The first world nations are destroying the second and third world nations in order to fuel our excessive desires.
The world must find a way to come together so that there will be a tomorrow for everyone. New legislation must be passed that protects not only the environment of America, but the environments of other countries. Big business must also realize that they can no longer use dirty legislation and kickbacks to continue to pollute the earth.
Another important aspect that people must learn is that if we cannot learn to recycle and reduce waste, one day we will run out of dumping ground. It is frightening to think that this is what it will to take to make most people realize that actions must be taken to clean up our earth. It seems that we will only be able to come together when there is not other alternative. Perhaps the must unfathomable thought is, what happens if people do not unite together now to protect our environment. It can only seem that we will once again be threatened with war as we fight each other to death over the last precious miles of land and food. Civilization will have come full circle; all of our technological and scientific advances will mean nothing if the earth is destroyed and mankind subsequently wiped out with it
Comments:
This is a generally well-developed response in which the writer examines the complexities of the issue and explains ideas clearly through good control of the elements of effective writing.
The writer strongly agrees with the topic's claim and uses the first paragraph to expand on the idea that environmental problems imperil the earth. These problems, according to the writer, derive from people's lack of maturity ("infantile needs and desires") and lack of foresight ("people are living for today and not tomorrow.")
The third paragraph provides a highly relevant example of the complexities involved in the issue, showing how damage to the rainforest can be attributed both to poverty in Latin America and to the voracious appetite of the wealthy North American "consumer society." From here the writer returns to the focus on planning for "tomorrow" and proposes a specific remedy ("New legislation must be passed?") The discussion closes with a passionate description of a negative scenario for the future.
The response is well organized but, unlike a 6 paper, does not sustain a tight focus. Although the example of the rain forest degradation is highly relevant and fully developed, many of the reasons and assertions receive only cursory development or explanation ("new legislation must be passed? It can only seem that we will once again be threatened with war?").
The sentence structure in the essay is often nicely varied but at other times is choppy ("This land is?" "This scenario depicts?" "The first world nations?") Thus, the connection between ideas is also choppy at times.
The vocabulary is generally well chosen, with words such as "depletion," "unfathomable," and "subsequently." However, the phrasing is at times imprecise, as in these examples: "We are only a small percentage," and "At no other time then in our present time has the need??? been more necessary?" Although these problems keep the paper out of the 6 category, it is nevertheless a strong response to the topic.
GRE寫作滿分范文賞析
"Our declining environment may bring the people of the world together as no politician, philosopher, or war ever could. Environmental problems are global in scope and respect no nation's boundaries. Therefore, people are faced with the choice of unity and cooperation on the one hand or disunity and a common tragedy on the other."
Cooperation---or Tragedy?
The solution to the world's growing environmental problems may have to wait awhile. It has been said that "environmental problems are global and respect no nation's boundaries." Unfortunately, pollution and its consequences still fall to large measure on those least likely to do anything about it: poor countries willing to sacrifice anything in order to sit at the table with the world's wealthy.
As far as the industrialized nations of the world are concerned, the world is a big place. Environmental destruction taking place outside their borders may sometimes be fodder for government pronouncements of concern, but few concrete actions. Deforestation of the Amazon, for instance, is of vital concern to all those who wish to continue breathing. But the only effective deterrent to this activity, the restriction of international aid money to those countries showing net deforestation, has been stalled in the United Nations by those unwilling to "interfere" in the internal politics of other nations.
Because of the differential impact of polluting activities around the world, and even in different regions of a single country, many governments will undoubtedly continue to promulgate only modest environmental regulations. Costs to polluting companies will continue to carry as much weight as the benefit of a pollution-free environment. Particularly in the current political climate of the United States, the well-documented expense of today's pollution-control measures will be stacked against the unknown long-term effects of polluting actitivities. "Why should I spend millions of dollars a year, which causes me to have to raise the cost of my goods or eliminate jobs, if no one really knows if air pollution is all that harmful? Show me the proof, " an air polluting company may demand.
Realistically, it won't be until critical mass is achieved that the hoped for "choice of unity and cooperation" will be a viable one. Only when the earth as a whole is so polluted that life itself becomes increasingly difficult for a majority of the world's people will there likely be the political will to force global environmental laws on governments worldwide. But the optimists (read: environmental activists) among us continue to believe that the world can be shown the error of its ways. They continue to point out that the sky is probably falling--or at least developing a big hole. The world, as a whole, ignores them.
One would hope, however, that governments, perhaps through a strengthened U.N., could somehow be forced to realize that when the Earth reaches the critical mass of pollution, it may be too late to do anything about it. That would be a "common tragedy" indeed.
Comments:
This excellent response displays an in-depth analysis of the issue, conveyed through the skillful use of language.
While acknowledging that environmental problems are serious and of global dimensions, the discussion explores the complexity of international cooperation. Such cooperation, the paper argues, runs into a variety of problems, and the writer offers persuasive examples to support that point:
-- the unwillingness of nations to "interfere" with other nations through
political measures such as restriction of foreign aid
-- inadequate environmental regulations, which are caused both by "the
differential impact of polluting activities" between countries and
regions and by the difficulty of comparing the "long-term effects of
polluting actitivities" with the more easily documented, short-term
costs of reducing pollution.
The paper distinguishes itself in part by its excellent organization. The first paragraph analyzes the claim and announces the writer's position; the second and third paragraphs provide clear examples supporting that position. The skillful use of a quotation from a business person vividly illustrates the economic impact of pollution controls. The last two paragraphs bring a sense of closure to the essay by continuing the theme announced in the first paragraph -- that cooperation must wait until more dire circumstances produce the political will necessary to reduce pollution.
Transitional phrases -- "because," "however," "for instance" -- help guide the reader through the argument. Also, effective sentence variety and the use of precise vocabulary help clarify meaning and confirm the score of 6.
GRE寫作：列提綱的注意事項(xiàng)相關(guān)文章：