GRE寫作AW3種高分寫法講解
2020GRE寫作AW3種高分寫法講解
GRE作文中ISSUE在許多考生看來是比較有難度的作文。這是因?yàn)槠湫枰孕姓順?gòu)建出一個(gè)完整合理的邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)框架。今天小編給大家?guī)砹薌RE寫作AW3種高分寫法講解 ,希望能夠幫助到大家，一起來學(xué)習(xí)吧。
GRE寫作AW3種高分寫法講解
GRE作文ISSUE展開方法：前提論證
即對(duì)題目中某個(gè)特殊的單詞進(jìn)行前提式討論，作為全文展開討論的基礎(chǔ)。
可以用作前提論證的素材單詞往往包括：
A、帶有主觀感情色彩的判斷詞，比如Just，Correct，Effective，Reasonable等等。
在討論這些觀點(diǎn)詞時(shí)就必須確立一個(gè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，進(jìn)而為全文的討論確定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，常見的比如“對(duì)社會(huì)中大部分人有利”“對(duì)社會(huì)穩(wěn)定有利”“能使資源有效分配，最低投入最高產(chǎn)出”等等。
B、作用、意義、任務(wù)等值得討論的名詞關(guān)鍵詞，比如Education，Government，Law，Teacher等等。
這些詞其實(shí)在間接討論A類判斷詞，即“B類詞干什么才是A類詞(教育干什么才是對(duì)的，法律干什么才是有效的……)”，由此確定判別一個(gè)事物該做什么的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，才能在全文中討論題目說的此事物做的東西是否正確。
前提論證的好處是從字面出發(fā)，確定主基調(diào)，可以防止全文的發(fā)展出現(xiàn)價(jià)值觀的自我矛盾導(dǎo)致的中心論點(diǎn)混亂，從而將文章后面的各段拉到一起。換句話說，就是我們討論什么問題時(shí)，需要先把什么別的一個(gè)小問題說清楚。前提論證法可以有效保證后文段落的邏輯有效聯(lián)系。
GRE作文ISSUE展開方法：升華論證
前提論證屬于前提層面，后面自然有更高階的層面，之前提到的學(xué)術(shù)、社會(huì)、個(gè)人就是這種層面層次。
其實(shí)我們寫ISSUE在組織分論點(diǎn)無外乎就兩種，一種同層面展開，一種層面升華式展開。同層面展開可以有辨證法、分領(lǐng)域討論，而不同層面的升華則包括了不同的哲學(xué)層次。這二者都屬于ISSUE題目要求中的“perspectives”。
而大家最喜歡用的保留式同意/反對(duì)，那個(gè)保留論點(diǎn)通常就是站在不同的層面上來看待問題，從而得出的不同結(jié)論。
一方面，層面升華可以使你的論證涵蓋不同的邏輯深度，從而保證對(duì)問題看法的全面性，另一方面，層面升華也能使文章的整體組織層層遞進(jìn)，做到結(jié)構(gòu)嚴(yán)密。
具體來說，常見的層面包括：
A、字面意義。見前提論證
B、學(xué)術(shù)層面。學(xué)習(xí)知識(shí)的有效性、合理性等等。這個(gè)層面比較淺，原因在于我們還要追問學(xué)習(xí)的目的是什么?接下來可以引出社會(huì)層面和個(gè)人層面。
C、社會(huì)層面。一個(gè)論點(diǎn)可能本身沒什么錯(cuò)誤，但一旦承認(rèn)它的正確性，就會(huì)導(dǎo)致種.種不堪設(shè)想的后果，比如過分強(qiáng)調(diào)有的法律不公正而造成犯罪分子有自己的道理，或者過分強(qiáng)調(diào)社會(huì)秩序的重要性造成獨(dú)裁當(dāng)?shù)烂癫涣纳?/p>
D、個(gè)人層面。之所以把這個(gè)放到最高層面是因?yàn)樯鐣?huì)效應(yīng)最終是作用于個(gè)人的。升華到最后往往是人類幸福、身心愉悅這種目的。個(gè)人層面的評(píng)論標(biāo)準(zhǔn)有很多，比如人本主義、弗洛伊德精神分析學(xué)說、唯物論、社會(huì)道德、先驗(yàn)主義等等。具體的可以查閱相關(guān)資料。
層面升華的好處是可以讓文章環(huán)環(huán)相扣，步步深入，最后的論證深度恰倒好處，而結(jié)構(gòu)也嚴(yán)密可靠。
GRE作文ISSUE展開方法：對(duì)比論證
正反論證就是說先說明了一個(gè)事物的必要性，然后說明缺乏它以后的后果。表面上看這象是廢話，但其實(shí)正反論證能讓你說的問題更加明白有有力，而且由于邏輯轉(zhuǎn)折簡(jiǎn)單，非常好把握。對(duì)于打字速度快的同學(xué)正反論證其實(shí)十分好用。
正反論證的好處很明顯，正反段相互依存，互為解釋，因此兩段之間的邏輯完全咬合。如果全文都以這種手法組織，結(jié)構(gòu)組織就會(huì)變得的非常輕松。官方范文就是個(gè)很好的例子：說明專家的必要性后先說正“反”，再說反“反”，整個(gè)文章兩頭照顧，內(nèi)容嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)。
在具體的操作上，正反論證往往是用反去證明正缺失(或過分)的后果，借以說明論證“正”的過程的合理性。
嚴(yán)格來講對(duì)于過度的所生的“反”應(yīng)該另立名詞，我這里為了方便就把二者放到一起說了。因?yàn)闆]有正確性就沒有過分的可能，這一點(diǎn)上過度所產(chǎn)生的“反”與“正”的“反”是相同的。物極必反也可以說是辯證法的一個(gè)角度，當(dāng)然與層面升華后產(chǎn)生的反面評(píng)價(jià)是不同的。
假如大家還在為了GRE作文提分而努力，那么本文中介紹的這三種論述方法，應(yīng)該能夠給大家?guī)硪欢◣椭?。而如果考生能夠熟練掌握這些實(shí)用的論證方法，那么想要在GRE ISSUE作文中拿到更為理想的成績(jī)就不會(huì)太過困難了。
GRE寫作高分范文：丑聞
Scandals-whether in politics, academia, or other areas-can be useful.They focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
丑聞――無論是政治、學(xué)術(shù)還是其他領(lǐng)域――可能會(huì)是有用的。丑聞可以用演說家或者改革家無法使用的手段讓我們注意到某些問題。
GRE寫作范文：
Scandals occur in nearly every field that human set foot in, both revealed and incubative.Once people recognize that the person they adored yesterday is actually a liar by the exposednesses of his scandal, the first reaction may be anger, sorrow and depression.However, if rational rethinking and remediation have been taken after the reports of scandals, actually greater progresses can always be achieved compared with the efforts made by the daily boring speeches made by speakers and reformers.
Scandals can clearly show us the hidden unreasonable and unjust regulations, therefore administers or the public can adjust or even correct those errors. After the Watergate Event, not only President Nixon lost his job, but further influence was conducted by the public and medium. They realized that the problem of the abuse of power which was neglected in the past. As a result, a closer scrutiny upon the high officials of government prevents them from abusing their power any longer. Recently, the filthy relationship between Juventus Club and several references was publicized by medium, which shocked the football circle by those large holes in the institutions of football league and thus forced the Italia Football Association to take actions towards Juventus, references and the ill institutions. While Juventus has been deprived the former championship, a series of more appropriate regulations have at last been added into the football systems. There is no denying that those scandals indeed prohibit the daily operations and developments of certain fields to some extent, but these deleterious effects can be temporary, if proper measures have been done immediately. In this case, scandals may become stimulations that can provoke the awareness of the emergency of the scandals, which is necessary for establishment of an ultimate solutions to the present problems.
Furthermore, compared with the accomplishments endowed by the professional speakers and reformers, the progresses made by the aftereffects of scandals are often more significant and fast. A scandal maker usually has his position in high status, which grants him power great enough to make his underground and illegal behavior so harmful and astonishing that it can be called a scandal. Before their scandals have been known to the public, they are generally admired and trusted by their superiors and inferiors, as well as the medium and public. Therefore, it is difficult or even impossible for speakers and reformers to win the battle against those scandal makers and their inequitable laws or regulations without the support of anyone. No one believes or even pays attention on whatever the speakers and reformers assert, if the scandal makers are trying to cover up those events by their power and trust they gained at the same time. Consequently those errors remain forever. Once the secrets of the scandal makers give away, however, their aura fades, legends evaporate, so does the trust and power endued. Under such circumstances that all sides feel unsatisfied and disappointed, it is much easier for reformers to draw the focus on their ameliorative allegations towards the long existed problems, and thus, the improvements can be made. Perhaps it may be strange to accept the ironic conclusion that scandals do play a more vital role in healing the morbid system of a certain realm than those reformers do sometimes, but oftentimes it is scandal that helps the reformers a lot to strike their targets, which leads to a future primary achievements for society.
Despite the forgoing contributions of scandals, they are not without its apparent problems. Hypersensitive worries may lead serious disorders or even disasters. A threshold trouble is about the excessive revealment of privacies of the officials, stars, or other persons who were doubted to have scandals. This was often done by some so-called responsible mediums in the name of observation the social problems. As a result, the bothered officials or the stars can hardly utilize their full abilities to fulfill their tasks or jobs. Just to meet the curiosity of the public so that they can bolster their sales and profits, these mediums' detective behaviors will inevitably bring about disorders to those who in charge in some areas. Secondly, overstatements of the grave effects of scandals may shadow the contributions of the scandal makers unfairly. Although Clinton was accused by his rose event, his dedication towards the resuscitation and prosperity of America's economy during his term of office cannot be denied. If his fault was overemphasized present, he may have to resign immediately, and his economic ability can no longer serve the society,which is an obvious loss of the society.
To be just, I acknowledge that most people hate to witness scandals happening around them. What is more, recessions and the private violations always come along with scandals.Nevertheless, seeing from another angle, if the scandals are in fact ineluctable, it may be wiser to bravely face with the extant problems. We should find them out and then correct them rather than simply denying their existence.
GRE寫作高分范文：道德與法律
Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system because moral behavior cannot be legislated.
現(xiàn)代社會(huì)的很多問題是法律和立法系統(tǒng)無法解決的，因?yàn)榈赖滦袨槭菬o法用法律約束的。
GRE寫作范文：
The proposition asserts that the laws and the legal system cannot resolve many problems problem of the modern society since moral behavior cannot be legislated. In my point of view, I fundamentally agree with the speaker, as discussed below.
First of all, I concede that the laws and the legal system are essential to the modern society and they can resolve many problems. Common sense tells us that everyone has his own position and behavior, depending on their beliefs, experiences, knowledge, professions and emotional concern.However, we cannot simply let everyone do everything that he or she wants, since this will lead to mess and may harm the stability of the society. Thus, the government has to announce the laws and build a just legal system to restrict the citizens. Only by doing this, can the society get to a balance and harmonious status? For instance, the industrial factories want to expel the polluted water into the river without making it clean. If there is not a law or a legal system to restrict the factories from expelling the polluted water, the poisoned water may get into the river, even the sea. This will be really harmful. It may firstly kill the animals living in the river, it may also further harm the human beings if they have drunk the water or eaten the polluted fish. It may bring damage to the environment as well. Considering this, we have to establish laws to prevent the factories from expelling polluted water and other detriments. From this case, we can see how important laws and legal systems are.
However, we have to admit that the laws and the legal systems cannot resolve many problems in the modern society as well, such as the usage of euthanasia, the homosexual marriage. When the Watson and Crick found the double-helix structure of the gene and the scientists further found the way to clone. It brings many social problems that the laws and legal systems cannot resolve. Should the scientists clone human beings? If yes, then what is the relationship between the two? Do the cloned people have the same right with the other human being or even whether they are human beings or not? Though the legal systems in many countries ban the scientists from cloning people, some scientists still do this secretly. All these questions cannot simply be resolved by the laws as it is related to the morality.
Additionally, the laws can not involve the moral behavior. If the laws consider the moral behaviors too much, it will lose justice. Nevertheless, only considering the laws without morals may cause mistake. For instance, in India, their law is statutes given by the government and the judge can only his judges on the bases of the existing laws. Once, a mother in India killed her son,who is a murderer and did lots of bad things. The police in India tried to catch him for years without any result. He committed so many crimes that even death cannot atone for the offence.His mother knows that her son will kill many more people if she does not kill him. Thus, when her son came back to see her one day, she killed him with the poison. In this case, to kill the mother is probably not the best choice, since this may make people think that being just is wrong. But according to the present law, the judger had to sentenced the mother to death, and this brought a widely debate thought out the country.
Further, only the morality can make people to understand what is right and what is wrong, and to restrict people with morality will be a good way. Under the pressure of laws and legal systems,many people just do the bad thing secretly because they do not know that they are wrong. And many people may even think that the laws are wrong and disobey or even resist the law. They may commit crimes again after they are punished. Only when a people have known the morality and find the right measurement to distinguish right and wrong, they can find their mistakes and become a better person. A statistics involving many prisons in China find that the prisoners who learn morality and know their mistakes have a much lower rate of committing crime again.
In the final analysis, we can see that the laws and legal system cannot resolve all the problems in the society and therefore we should agree with the author.
GRE寫作相關(guān)文章：