gre考試寫作方式哪些值得借鑒
gre考試令很多學(xué)子發(fā)愁，到底gre寫作考試該如何提分呢?哪些gre寫作考試方法值得借鑒呢?下面小編就和大家分享gre考試寫作方式哪些值得借鑒，希望能夠幫助到大家，來(lái)欣賞一下吧。
gre考試寫作方式哪些值得借鑒?
四種gre寫作考試方法
1。GRE寫作考試有練習(xí)題：
為了達(dá)到公平，在考試中公布所有的寫作試題，以達(dá)到能力和本土。
演講者互相競(jìng)爭(zhēng)。考生應(yīng)在考試前預(yù)習(xí)所有試題(節(jié)省考試時(shí)間)，通過(guò)撰寫100-150篇大綱了解GRE寫作的總體結(jié)構(gòu)，通過(guò)撰寫30-50篇文章練習(xí)寫作思路和表達(dá)方式。練習(xí)題里的試題越熟練，考試就越好。
2。gre寫作考試以計(jì)件方式進(jìn)行評(píng)估：
每個(gè)評(píng)論員都很快地評(píng)論你的文章。不可能把每一個(gè)細(xì)節(jié)都看得很仔細(xì)?？忌祥喚砣说拈喚硭季S，用最規(guī)范的結(jié)構(gòu)和最清晰的表達(dá)方式來(lái)反映自己的思維：第一段要明確提出自己的觀點(diǎn)，第二段要開放，每段的開頭應(yīng)該是該段的主題句。
三。gre考試寫作得分是整體得分：
首先，根據(jù)公布的各評(píng)分部分的評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，評(píng)分主要集中在以下三個(gè)方面：1)邏輯分析能力(洞察力要求);2)條理清晰的要求;3)語(yǔ)言能力(標(biāo)準(zhǔn)書面英語(yǔ);簡(jiǎn)明要求;可變結(jié)構(gòu)要求)。
但也強(qiáng)調(diào)，評(píng)級(jí)是整體性的，而不是從各個(gè)角度分別打分。這表明，雖然中國(guó)考生的語(yǔ)言能力很弱，但他們可以得到6分，,gre寫作方法,gre寫作怎么練只要他們能給評(píng)論者留下深刻印象的其他兩個(gè)角度。因此，當(dāng)我們?cè)诙唐趦?nèi)盡最大努力提高語(yǔ)言能力(語(yǔ)言能力的培養(yǎng)不能在一兩天內(nèi)完成)時(shí)，我們應(yīng)該在復(fù)習(xí)時(shí)盡可能深入地分析這個(gè)話題。學(xué)習(xí)高分作文的結(jié)構(gòu)，通過(guò)這兩方面的突破，迅速提高作文的總分。
4。GRE寫作的兩部分在總分中的權(quán)重相同：
由于aa的寫作不涉及自身觀點(diǎn)的發(fā)展，只需要指出作者的邏輯漏洞，因此經(jīng)過(guò)訓(xùn)練后寫作并不困難;而ai的寫作需要發(fā)展自己的思想，不僅需要邏輯洞察力的能力，同時(shí)也具備一定的論證能力和語(yǔ)言組織能力。中國(guó)考生很難在短時(shí)間內(nèi)提高。但是，這兩部分在總分中的權(quán)重是一樣的，所以考生的策略應(yīng)該是盡量提高人工智能部分的寫作能力，盡量保持人工智能部分的滿分(或高分)。
因?yàn)槿绻鸄A部分滿分，AI部分只需爭(zhēng)取4分以上，就能保證作文總分在5分以上。其次，評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和作文評(píng)分的計(jì)算參照了過(guò)度評(píng)價(jià)模型。我們可以很容易地發(fā)現(xiàn)，評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中的問(wèn)題和論點(diǎn)都有共同點(diǎn)：第一，觀點(diǎn)要深刻，論證要有說(shuō)服力;第二，組織要有條理，表達(dá)要清晰準(zhǔn)確;第三、語(yǔ)言要流利;句型復(fù)雜，詞匯豐富。這三者分別是關(guān)于文本的“思想性”、“結(jié)構(gòu)性”和“表現(xiàn)性”。大多數(shù)高分考生在這三個(gè)方面表現(xiàn)都很好。從這里入手，采用“各個(gè)擊破”的方法，剖析GRE作文的精髓，從而得到一個(gè)理想的分?jǐn)?shù)，這是很自然的。
如何練習(xí)GRE寫作
瘋狂的作家一開始總是不理智的，特別是當(dāng)他們寫第一期和第一次辯論的時(shí)候。aw的真正提高是在寫作的過(guò)程中，但在這之前一定要讀一定數(shù)量的書。
我個(gè)人的觀點(diǎn)是，在積累一定量后，我可以寫幾篇文章，找出最弱的部分，最需要從文章中加強(qiáng)部分，然后找到解決的辦法。在最近一個(gè)月左右的時(shí)間里，我將進(jìn)行一次模型考試培訓(xùn)。在熟悉GRE作文練習(xí)題和模型文本和作文要求后，我可以試著寫一篇，然后找出差距。語(yǔ)言和例子如下：最好是積累之前，但如果積累不夠，你也可以先寫一篇文章，然后比較。
GRE寫作高分范文：現(xiàn)代攝像機(jī)和印刷術(shù)
“The video camera provides such an accurate and convincing record of contemporary life that it has become a more important form of documentation than written records.”
攝像機(jī)可以通過(guò)如此精確而有力的記錄手段來(lái)再現(xiàn)當(dāng)代生活，因此它已經(jīng)代替書面記錄成為了一種更重要的記錄手段。
GRE寫作范文：
“The video camera provides such an accurate and convincing record of contemporary life that it has become a more important form of documentation than written records.”There have been many methods of documenting in the history of human， from carved ancient pottery to sheepskin documents， of which the video camera may be the newest form with certain superiorities and inferiorities to written records. The advantages of video camera certainly make it an important form of documentation， but not to the extent of being more essential than written records due to its disadvantages.
To begin with， video can be interpreted as a series of pictures associated along the time， while written records can be considered as the descriptions of these pictures.Therefore， it is undoubtedly that video contains much more information than that of written records. From a video， we can clearly know what happened with subtle details.Merely with a television set， we can easily watch the happenings at home， such as the Olympic Games， comfortably sitting on the sofa， needless to be present on the spot.
And more excitedly， certain close-up enables us to scrutinize our favorable athletes. If there isn‘t video camera， we may be unable to enjoy such activities unless we can afford time and expense to be on the spot. While it is true that we can also be acquainted with the circumstances through newspaper or other media， however， the written record may be unable to present them as accurate as video. The imagination from the reports， however detailed， dooms to be imaginary， by all means different from the real circumstance， which video can represent. Moreover， the written records may contain some mistakes due to the carelessness or injustice of its reporters， while the video may be more accurate and convincing.
Another strongpoint of video is that it can be perceived simply by visual signals， from which people mainly get information in their daily lives， and therefore this method is more natural than written records. Everyone， ranging from a babbling child to an old grandpa， is able to get some information from the video just as they do during their daily lives， regardless of their literate ability. While the written record， no matter how easily it is represented， requires literacy of its readers， and a newspaper or book means nothing to an illiterate person. In addition， video is much easier to comprehend for people all over the world. For instance， an American can grasp nothing about a story written in Chinese unless s/he has learnt such a foreign language. However， s/he can absolutely understand something about a video recorded in China， although s/he may be confused with the language spoken in the video.
While video is certainly not superior to written recorders in all aspects， its limitations determine that the written record will not be replaced at least at present. The first disadvantage of video is that it is much more inconvenient and expensive. Video must be recorded on the spot， namely， when an event happens to you， you cannot record it unless you have a camera at hand. However， even though you haven’t paper and pencil either， you are still able to recall it to record based on your remembrance.
Therefore， for those who can’t afford a handy camera or who are unwilling to bring it anytime anywhere， the written records may be the easiest form available. Further， another weakness of video is that its cost is too high and its correspondingly high-quality record may be beyond people‘s requirement. The cost of making a written report is much less than that of manipulating a video. Also， every morning we may browse a newspaper to know what happened throughout the world， and the simple report， which may only consume us a few seconds， meets our needs of curiosity; we needn’t the accuracy and vividness of video， which may be more time-consuming.
GRE寫作高分范文：技術(shù)與學(xué)習(xí)的矛盾
Although innovations such as video，computers，and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students，these technologies all too often distract from real learning.
盡管諸如電視、電腦和互聯(lián)網(wǎng)這樣的發(fā)明似乎給學(xué)校教育提供了進(jìn)步的手段，但是所有這些技術(shù)往往也是在偏離真正的學(xué)習(xí)。
GRE寫作題庫(kù)范文：
Nowadays there is a growing concern about the role that innovations have played in the field of learning. While most people think that innovations benefit learning process in various ways，different opinions arise that these technology advancements actually distract students from real learning. On balance，according to my personal observation,whether innovations can be beneficial or detrimental to real learning depends on the students and the teachers，not on these innovations themselves.
To begin with，technological innovations do help teaching and learning in various ways.With the aid of these technologies，the process of teaching and learning can be shorter and easier than before. For instance，if a student want certain published papers of an academic discipline，he/she may look through considerable catalogs to find the ones he/she needs. However，with the help of Internet innovation，at present most of these papers are published online. Consequently，to find certain paper the procedure is much easier and shorter，the students just type the key words and other information of the paper，and then the system will search the database，and the papers are there waiting for them. As this new approach can save a lot of time for the students，he/she could have more time reading the papers and absorbing the knowledge rather than checking and looking for the papers that could be a waste of his/her time. This example aptly illustrates how technology advancement benefited the students and their learning process.
Secondly，while innovations can help learning in various ways，it is more important that the central role of the pursuit for knowledge and wisdoms are maintained. What real matters is not the approach but the purpose of learning. In India，where modern technologies are less applied to the learning process than in the US and other developed countries，still a lot of distinguished students achieved their academic goal with their hard work and desires to knowledge. In the US，where the software engineering students are given the most advanced facilities and apparatus for their learning and research，however，it is wildly accepted that they are far less outstanding compared to the Indian students of software，who may share computers in groups. From this comparison we can see that the real and core push of learning is the desire for knowledge，not the help of innovations.
In addition，if not guided properly，the technology advancement might inhibit learning.In other words，innovation can distract the students from real learning than helping them. It is obvious that a computer can help students of science to calculate mathematical equations but can also be used for recreation such as net surfing or computer games. It is highly possible that these students can spend more time and energy on recreations rather than learning when using a computer. Thus，learning is inhibited. Under this circumstance，guidance and restrictions are needed to ensure the right use of innovations for learning，or the consequence may be on the contrary to the students and teachers' desire.
gre考試寫作方式哪些值得借鑒相關(guān)文章：