托福寫(xiě)作字?jǐn)?shù)合適的范圍

托福寫(xiě)作字?jǐn)?shù)合適的范圍是多少呢?今天小編給大家?guī)?lái)了托福寫(xiě)作字?jǐn)?shù)合適的范圍，希望能夠幫助到大家，下面小編就和大家分享，來(lái)欣賞一下吧。

托福寫(xiě)作字?jǐn)?shù)合適的范圍

對(duì)于托福獨(dú)立寫(xiě)作來(lái)說(shuō)，考官考察文章的原則是：“Readers should focus on what the examinee does well?！睆倪@里我們可以看出，整個(gè)過(guò)程不是考察考生表現(xiàn)出的優(yōu)點(diǎn)過(guò)程，這里要求我們需要寫(xiě)出足夠的字?jǐn)?shù)。那么我們應(yīng)該把作文字?jǐn)?shù)控制在多少合適呢?還是字?jǐn)?shù)越多高分呢?

在托福寫(xiě)作考試中，特別是獨(dú)立寫(xiě)作中，對(duì)于文章要寫(xiě)多少字讓很多考生十分的頭疼，寫(xiě)少了肯定是不行的，寫(xiě)多了又怕時(shí)間不夠，那么到底是越多越好，還是只寫(xiě)出那個(gè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)就好了。下面小編為大家?guī)?lái)的是托福寫(xiě)作字?jǐn)?shù)越多分越高嗎?希望對(duì)大家托福獨(dú)立寫(xiě)作有幫助。

ETS對(duì)于托福獨(dú)立寫(xiě)作的評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)OG上是這么說(shuō)的：“An effective response is typically about 300 words long。 If you write fewer than 300 words，you may still receive a top score，but experience has shown that shorter responses typically do not demonstrate the development of ideas needed to earn a score of 5?！边@個(gè)很明顯的讓考生看到，一篇的作文，考生是要將文章寫(xiě)到300字以上。當(dāng)然了，有些文章的字?jǐn)?shù)沒(méi)有達(dá)到300，但依然是滿(mǎn)分，這種情況畢竟是少數(shù)。對(duì)于托福寫(xiě)作滿(mǎn)分作文，按照評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)里的要求是：它肯定是對(duì)于考題充分的展開(kāi)了論述，有利的支持文章的觀點(diǎn)，還有就是充足的字?jǐn)?shù)。

對(duì)于托福獨(dú)立寫(xiě)作，評(píng)分分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)里給出的字?jǐn)?shù)下限是不能低于180字，但如果你所要表達(dá)的觀點(diǎn)都表達(dá)到了，字?jǐn)?shù)也不能少于180字。因此，對(duì)于寫(xiě)作文章的字?jǐn)?shù)是關(guān)鍵，且字?jǐn)?shù)超過(guò)了標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，并不影響得分的。

對(duì)于OG里的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，作文中如果字?jǐn)?shù)超了，那么是不會(huì)扣分的，但是也不要指望用堆字的方式來(lái)為你的作文加分。在寫(xiě)作考試中，如果讓考官看到你的文章字?jǐn)?shù)很多，給他的印象是你在規(guī)定時(shí)間里很能寫(xiě)，有了這個(gè)印象，在評(píng)分上的印象也就好了，但并不會(huì)給你在字?jǐn)?shù)上有加分的，畢竟主要看的還是寫(xiě)作內(nèi)容。

這個(gè)和綜合寫(xiě)作的批改還有點(diǎn)區(qū)別，這個(gè)可能是評(píng)分機(jī)制的不同而已。所以大家在寫(xiě)作的時(shí)候，首先要寫(xiě)出要求的下降，如果連這個(gè)還達(dá)不到，那么你的文章一定評(píng)不了高分了，再有就是如果時(shí)間充裕，你的表達(dá)的內(nèi)容比較豐富，可以盡量的多寫(xiě)，這樣是不會(huì)被扣分的。除了寫(xiě)作的字?jǐn)?shù)要求之后，考生只要牢記托福寫(xiě)作的要點(diǎn)，要觀點(diǎn)明確 ，邏輯清晰，內(nèi)容表達(dá)出來(lái)就可以了。

大家在備考的時(shí)候，多多對(duì)于這方面的練習(xí)，還有一個(gè)很重要的就是練習(xí)一下打字速度，有些考生，不是因?yàn)槲恼聦?xiě)的不好，是因?yàn)闀r(shí)間不夠;不是因?yàn)樽謹(jǐn)?shù)不夠，同樣是因?yàn)闀r(shí)間不夠，而讓文章沒(méi)有完成，這種情況就讓你在托福寫(xiě)作這一塊失分太不劃算了。

托福寫(xiě)作文章是不是字?jǐn)?shù)越多越高分?以上就給大家做了詳細(xì)的解讀，大家在備考時(shí)就要更加清晰的制定出符合自己本身的托福寫(xiě)作備考計(jì)劃后，小編預(yù)祝大家托?？荚嚹苋〉美硐氲某煽?jī)。

托福寫(xiě)作高分滿(mǎn)分范文點(diǎn)評(píng)和思路解析：是否應(yīng)該要求學(xué)生穿校服?

托福寫(xiě)作難點(diǎn)話題一覽

Should high schools require students to wear school uniforms or permit them to decide what to wear to school?

Some high schools require all students to wear school uniforms. Other high schools permit students to decide what to wear to school. Which of these two school policies do you think is better? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.

寫(xiě)作思路展開(kāi)結(jié)構(gòu)分析

這個(gè)話題相信中國(guó)考生應(yīng)該是比較能感同身受的，畢竟大部分中小學(xué)的校服在審美上往往都是比較讓人一言難盡的。從好處上來(lái)說(shuō)穿校服便于統(tǒng)一管理，培養(yǎng)學(xué)生的紀(jì)律性，避免攀比等等，從壞處上說(shuō)校服難看缺乏個(gè)性不利于學(xué)生自由發(fā)展和培養(yǎng)審美也都可以說(shuō)，總之可以說(shuō)的點(diǎn)還是很多的。

本話題高分范文賞析

While in most present day high schools it is controversial that whether students should wear uniforms, most elementary schools have adopted uniform policy with wide support. Uniforms serve students benefits in several ways. First of all, uniforms act as social equalizers. Children often feel less social pressure when everyone in the school dresses the same way. Students who can not be fashionable due to limited family finances are made to feel more comfortable among their peers. Moreover, the wearing of uniforms influences students' perceptions of school climate. Students are made to feel as if they are a part of a team by wearing a uniform. School climate is improved considerably because kids perceive that they fit in because they look like everybody else. In addition, school uniforms would assist students and parents in other ways. Students would learn to appreciate the elimination of so many choices when getting dressed for a school day. Students would not be tardy for school as often because of the indecision about what to wear in the mornings. However, when the issue comes to high school situation, further details should be carefully examined. Students in high schools are in a much different situation from students in elementary schools. High school students are sometimes called young adults, by which people are expecting their maturity, at least to some extent. It's moderate that schools are expected to operate a well-disciplined, structured environment that is conducive to learning. But uniform is not the right answer to various difficulties and problems that the high school education is confronting. For example, while proponents address the safety that uniform policy would bring, opponents are aware of the fact that campus violence would not be reduced because of uniforms. Having grown up already, most students no longer feel that uniforms help them become a part of the school. Furthermore, uniforms may not save parents as much money as many people would like to believe. Uniforms do not eliminate the need for clothing needed for outside school. Students many times don't wear their school clothing the rest of the day once they are out of school. Sneakers, jackets, boots, casual clothing, and more will still be needed. What may first appear to be economical may not be accurate in reality. It has been said that a controversy can not exist without a fundamental dispute, and it seems that the answer to the school uniform debate is not a simple yes or no. There is no clear consensus as to the benefits of school uniforms. However, as to high schools, uniform policy should eventually be reconsidered as many other regulations which have already been eliminated including "Boys' hair should not touch collar," or "Girls' skirts must be longer than knees."

托福寫(xiě)作高分滿(mǎn)分范文點(diǎn)評(píng)和思路解析：憑第一印象判斷他人的對(duì)錯(cuò)

托福寫(xiě)作難點(diǎn)話題一覽

Judge people by first impressions: right or wrong?

Some people trust their first impressions about a person's character because they believe these judgments are generally correct. Other people do not judge a person's character quickly because they believe first impressions are often wrong. Compare these two attitudes. Which attitude do you agree with? Support your choice with specific examples.

寫(xiě)作思路展開(kāi)結(jié)構(gòu)分析

第一印象的對(duì)錯(cuò)可以算是比較經(jīng)典的一個(gè)話題了，無(wú)論是寫(xiě)作文還是辯論這個(gè)話題都是比較能引發(fā)不同觀點(diǎn)的，當(dāng)然從客觀角度來(lái)說(shuō)反對(duì)第一印象其實(shí)比較好寫(xiě)，因?yàn)閖udge by first impression從美式政治正確的角度來(lái)說(shuō)一般都是要被反對(duì)的，反對(duì)的理由也會(huì)相對(duì)好找一些。

本話題高分范文賞析

Some people judge a person's character by first impressions simply because they believe these judgments are, for the most part, correct. Other people are warier about making judgments quickly because they believe their original impressions could be faulty. However, it's a common pattern: if someone makes a good first impression, people will be inclined to believe it, and make a judgment based on that; if the person makes a poor first impression, people will usually hold off judgment until a second or third meeting, to ensure that the original assessment was correct. My personal philosophy for meeting new people is to give them the benefit of the doubt. If someone makes a very good first impression, I am likely to believe that that is his/her character unless, on future encounters, he/she proves it to be otherwise. I believe that this is a fair, beneficial way of making judgments. I do not think there is any reason to be suspicious of someone's character unless he/she has given me a reason to think so. It is even possible that I will make a bad first impression on someone if I am too suspicious of his/her character. However, I also believe it is important to hold off judgment if someone makes a bad first impression. There are a multitude of reasons why someone might be in a bad mood, and therefore make a poor impression. For example, perhaps I am meeting a man who just had something bad happen to him. Perhaps his bag was stolen, and it had some important documents in it. If this happened to me, I would surely be in a bad mood, and not make a good impression on any new people I met. Therefore, I think it is important to wait until a second, or even third meeting before passing judgment.