GRE寫作如何正確表達(dá)論述觀點(diǎn)

GRE寫作如何正確表達(dá)論述觀點(diǎn)?這些常用句式你要了解，快來一起學(xué)習(xí)吧，分享下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。

GRE寫作如何正確表達(dá)論述觀點(diǎn)?這些常用句式你要了解

新GRE寫作表達(dá)技巧1

counterproductive adj.產(chǎn)生相反效果(結(jié)果)的

e.g. It is counterproductive to be too tough: it just makes the staff resentful.

e.g. Although the speaker overlooks certain circumstances in which undueskepticism might be counterproductive, and even harmful, on balance I agree thatwe should not passively accept whatever is passed off as fact; otherwise, human knowledge would never advance.

新GRE寫作表達(dá)技巧2

seminal adj.萌芽的，潛在的;開創(chuàng)性的;有重大影響的

e.g. in the seminal state (在萌芽狀態(tài)) seminal thoughts / seminal principle(基本原則)

e.g. a seminal book/poet / This experiment was to have a seminal influence on his own political development.

新GRE寫作表達(dá)技巧3

forgo v.放棄 (The choice to forgo his security is always available, although it might carry unpleasant consequence)

新GRE寫作表達(dá)技巧4

intuition n.直覺 (I will trust my strong intuition that free will is an essential part of our being as humans.)

新GRE寫作表達(dá)技巧5

satisfy v.證明是正當(dāng)?shù)?，公證的;為…尋找正當(dāng)理由

e.g. Such action can be justified on the grounds of greater efficiency.

e.g. In the final analysis, government cannot philosophically justify assisting large cities for the purpose of either promoting or preserving the nation's cultural traditions; nor is government assistance necessary toward these ends.

新GRE寫作表達(dá)技巧6

resort to … 訴諸…

e.g. no necessity to resort to violent actions such as demonstration, riot or rebel.

新GRE寫作表達(dá)技巧7

hinge on … 以…為轉(zhuǎn)移，靠…轉(zhuǎn)動

e.g. The claim that society’s destiny hinges on how children are socialized, while appealing in some respects, is an over-statement at best.

新GRE寫作表達(dá)技巧8

at best 最多，充其量;以最樂觀的觀點(diǎn)來看

新GRE寫作表達(dá)技巧9

collaborate to …

e.g. For example, scientists, researchers, and even computer programmers must collaborate to establish common goals, coordinate efforts, and meet time lines.

新GRE寫作表達(dá)技巧10

lend some credence to … 提供支持

e.g. While our everyday experience might lend credence to this assertion.

e.g. Recent advances in molecular biology and genetics lend some credence to this position, by suggesting that these determining physical forces include our own inpidual genetic makeup.

新版GRE寫作新題庫：Argument

題目：

The president of Grove College has recommended that the college abandon its century-old tradition of all-female education and begin admitting men. Pointing to other all-female colleges that experienced an increase in applications after adopting coeducation, the president argues that coeducation would lead to a significant increase in applications and enrollment. However, the director of the alumnae association opposes the plan. Arguing that all-female education is essential to the very identity of the college, the director cites annual surveys of incoming students in which these students say that the school's all-female status was the primary reason they selected Grove. The director also points to a survey of Grove alumnae in which a majority of respondents strongly favored keeping the college all female.

Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.

中文翻譯：

G學(xué)院院長建議Grove學(xué)院放棄其已有百年歷史的女校傳統(tǒng)，允許錄取男性。鑒于其他女校在實(shí)行男女同校后，學(xué)生申請數(shù)量增加。院長認(rèn)為G實(shí)行男女同校一定會在申請和入學(xué)人數(shù)上都有大幅提升。但校友會的主席卻反對該提議，并認(rèn)為G的女校形式已經(jīng)成為深入人心。在每年一度的新生調(diào)查中顯示女校的性質(zhì)是她們報考G的主要原因。另外在G校友中的調(diào)查顯示絕大多數(shù)的回訪者強(qiáng)烈建議保留女校傳統(tǒng)。

寫一篇回應(yīng)，在其中討論還有哪些問題需要被回答才能決定文中的推薦是否能得到預(yù)期結(jié)果，并務(wù)請解釋對這些問題的回答是如何幫助更好的評估文中的建議的。

新GRE寫作官方優(yōu)秀范文精選

GRE寫作題目：

Although innovations such as video，computers，and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students，these technologies all too often distract from real learning.

盡管諸如電視、電腦和互聯(lián)網(wǎng)這樣的發(fā)明似乎給學(xué)校教育提供了進(jìn)步的手段，但是所有這些技術(shù)往往也是在偏離真正的學(xué)習(xí)。

GRE寫作范文：

Nowadays there is a growing concern about the role that innovations have played in the field of learning. While most people think that innovations benefit learning process in various ways，different opinions arise that these technology advancements actually distract students from real learning. On balance，according to my personal observation，whether innovations can be beneficial or detrimental to real learning depends on the students and the teachers，not on these innovations themselves.

To begin with，technological innovations do help teaching and learning in various ways.With the aid of these technologies，the process of teaching and learning can be shorter and easier than before. For instance，if a student want certain published papers of an academic discipline，he/she may look through considerable catalogs to find the ones he/she needs. However，with the help of Internet innovation，at present most of these papers are published online. Consequently，to find certain paper the procedure is much easier and shorter， the students just type the key words and other information of the paper，and then the system will search the database，and the papers are there waiting for them. As this new approach can save a lot of time for the students，he/she could have more time reading the papers and absorbing the knowledge rather than checking and looking for the papers that could be a waste of his/her time. This example aptly illustrates how technology advancement benefited the students and their learning process.

Secondly，while innovations can help learning in various ways，it is more important that the central role of the pursuit for knowledge and wisdoms are maintained. What real matters is not the approach but the purpose of learning. In India，where modern technologies are less applied to the learning process than in the US and other developed countries，still a lot of distinguished students achieved their academic goal with their hard work and desires to knowledge. In the US，where the software engineering students are given the most advanced facilities and apparatus for their learning and research，however，it is wildly accepted that they are far less outstanding compared to the Indian students of software，who may share computers in groups. From this comparison we can see that the real and core push of learning is the desire for knowledge，not the help of innovations.

In addition，if not guided properly，the technology advancement might inhibit learning.In other words，innovation can distract the students from real learning than helping them. It is obvious that a computer can help students of science to calculate mathematical equations but can also be used for recreation such as net surfing or computer games. It is highly possible that these students can spend more time and energy on recreations rather than learning when using a computer. Thus，learning is inhibited. Under this circumstance，guidance and restrictions are needed to ensure the right use of innovations for learning，or the consequence may be on the contrary to the students and teachers‘ desire.

To conclude，technological innovations are beneficial to learning in many ways，but when using these technologies，one should not forget the real purpose of learning and remember not to be distracted for other usages of these innovations that are irrelevant or detrimental to learning. On balance，innovation here serves as a double-edges sword，and its right use is dependent on the students and the teachers.

GRE寫作如何正確表達(dá)論述觀點(diǎn)相關(guān)文章：