高級(jí)口譯考試口試攻略

高級(jí)口譯分筆試成績(jī)的有效期為兩年，兩年中共有四次口試機(jī)會(huì)，若在此階段通過了口試，則能拿到高級(jí)口譯的證書。下面小編就和大家分享　高級(jí)口譯考試口試攻略，希望能夠幫助到大家，來欣賞一下吧。

高級(jí)口譯考試口試攻略

先從口語開始說吧：

口語的要求是語音語調(diào)、篇章結(jié)構(gòu)、內(nèi)容和流利度。其實(shí)一般來說能一直講較為又調(diào)理都能過，畢竟是考口譯的證書。如果大家做好了去考口試的準(zhǔn)備的話，口語一般不需要怎么擔(dān)心。

口試的評(píng)分呢從圖中總結(jié)一下就是：

總共四大段(兩段英翻中、兩端中翻英)中各分兩小段，總共八段，中翻英英翻中各四段。

1) 8段里可以有2段成績(jī)?yōu)椴患案?/p>

2)每段的1/3可以漏譯、錯(cuò)譯

3)數(shù)字和重要細(xì)節(jié)不能漏錯(cuò)譯

注意：高口每段留給你翻譯的時(shí)間很少，英譯漢大約為45-50秒，漢譯英有60-70秒，所以一定要結(jié)束立馬開口+語速快。

考試的時(shí)候我第一段有一句話沒有說完，于是第二段立馬rap

其實(shí)間隔時(shí)間短是高口最難的部分，畢竟每段1/3可以出錯(cuò)，但是時(shí)間短就要求反應(yīng)非常迅速。

考試過程

考點(diǎn)報(bào)到之后要把電子產(chǎn)品都放在一信封里訂起來，然后老師會(huì)叫號(hào)，叫到的到口試的準(zhǔn)備室里。這個(gè)時(shí)候會(huì)發(fā)給你口語的題目，可以在準(zhǔn)考證后面寫，但是之后會(huì)粘起來。等叫到你去考試的時(shí)候，前面一般還有一個(gè)人在里面考，這個(gè)時(shí)候可以繼續(xù)準(zhǔn)備一下口語。一般老師會(huì)在你口語說了一兩分鐘后打斷你，但是我當(dāng)時(shí)老師并沒有打斷我，一直讓我說了五分鐘。這之后就是口譯，就是我前面一直說的，口譯就是一定要快，不然真的說不完…………

幾個(gè)點(diǎn)大家注意

帶好一只水筆，在候考室想口語的時(shí)候沒有筆提供，進(jìn)去考試了才給你筆

考試的時(shí)間可能會(huì)很早或者很遲

我是最后一批進(jìn)考場(chǎng)的，當(dāng)時(shí)因?yàn)樘t還被調(diào)劑去了其他考場(chǎng)。當(dāng)時(shí)有點(diǎn)擔(dān)心會(huì)控制考場(chǎng)的及格率，雖然覺得自己講的不錯(cuò)但是有點(diǎn)慌，事實(shí)告訴我們，只要講的好還是能過的!

還有就是一定要記得遲早飯，我當(dāng)初覺得早上吃不進(jìn)東西然后沒吃早飯。最后等的快哭了

帶一些平時(shí)的口譯資料

在候考室是可以看自己帶的資料的，我個(gè)人覺得在進(jìn)去之前做一些視譯練練嘴找找感覺還是挺好的

03

如何準(zhǔn)備高級(jí)口譯考試

首先就來說說教材：

我其實(shí)沒有完全在準(zhǔn)備高口，因?yàn)橛袇⒓颖荣惗冶緛硎窍肴タ级诘模愿呖诘臅鴽]有怎么刷，但是還是把我用過的推薦給大家

1. 口試官方教材

官方教材在準(zhǔn)備筆試的時(shí)候就全套買來了，但是因?yàn)檫@本書很小很厚，沒有辦法完全壓下去，導(dǎo)致我沒有耐心看?。但是有些時(shí)候高口會(huì)考里面的原文。(我當(dāng)時(shí)考試中好像有一篇，當(dāng)然我沒有刷過)所以還是建議大家看一下。

2. 真題

我是大概考試前三天還是很認(rèn)真的刷了一遍真題，可以很好了解難度大概怎么樣，練練口。

大家有時(shí)間的話真題可以多刷幾遍，自己計(jì)個(gè)時(shí)間看看來不來得及。

3. 新東方口試備考精要(紫皮書)

這本書我在大一的時(shí)候有刷過一遍，但是這次考試前沒有怎么刷過。這本書是模仿高口考試，比較有代入感。

大家有空刷一遍高口部分也是極好的

4. 二口實(shí)務(wù)

因?yàn)楸緛砥鋵?shí)是想去考二口的，但是由于一些原因沒有報(bào)名。但是之前一直都在刷二口的書。在考高口前我差不多已經(jīng)吧二口實(shí)務(wù)的教材和配套練習(xí)兩本刷完了。在這些練習(xí)中，很明顯的看出筆記和口譯都有很大的進(jìn)步，所以材料其實(shí)沒有特別的重要!多練才是硬道理!!!

最后來一點(diǎn)我的tips：

1. 建議大家練習(xí)的時(shí)候錄音。這點(diǎn)真的超重要，不聽錄音你永遠(yuǎn)不知道自己翻的有多么糟糕。很多人在翻譯的時(shí)候會(huì)有emm a之類的停頓，錄音之后會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)自己的不好習(xí)慣進(jìn)行改正。同時(shí)可以控制自己的時(shí)間，畢竟高口真的有點(diǎn)坑…語速需要很快。

2. 平時(shí)多去比賽+public speaking

心態(tài)真的特別重要!假如特別緊張的話其實(shí)非常不利發(fā)揮。比賽參加多了可以鍛煉心態(tài)。還可以見識(shí)到很多大神，更有動(dòng)力。以及認(rèn)識(shí)很多志同道合的朋友。都很棒!

答疑

這邊我搜集了一些在微博私信/評(píng)論的問題和大家分享

問：聽的懂文章但是記不下來怎么辦?聽完文章之后不記得剛剛放了什么

答：以我個(gè)人的經(jīng)驗(yàn)來看過于注重筆記就很容易導(dǎo)致記不得文章內(nèi)容，而且還看不懂自己的筆記。假如文章比較難，聽第一遍的時(shí)候沒有聽懂，那么第二遍就干脆不要做筆記直接聽懂反而效果比較好。

假如筆記來不及記的話呢還是要多練習(xí)筆記法，建立自己的筆記體系。也可以多用復(fù)述等等方法來提高自己的記憶力。

問：有什么辦法可以聽英文的時(shí)候又做筆記又理清邏輯的呢

答：當(dāng)然是要多練了!剛開始假如沒有形成自己的筆記體系再加聽力不好的話，當(dāng)然會(huì)出現(xiàn)筆記記不下來又聽不懂的情況了。

問：看了你的微博之后發(fā)現(xiàn)你從大一就開始看口譯的書了，我大三了來得及嗎?

答：假如下定決心做一件事，無論早還是遲，只要努力就一定會(huì)有結(jié)果。假如你從大一開始三天打魚兩天曬網(wǎng)的話不太可能會(huì)能真的拿到證，如果下定決心了的話，從今天開始學(xué)起吧!

問：距離口試考試還有兩個(gè)月時(shí)間，現(xiàn)在開始準(zhǔn)備來得及嗎?

答：其實(shí)來得及來不及自己心里肯定是有數(shù)的。還是和前一個(gè)問題一樣，假如你能做到一天7個(gè)小時(shí)完全浸泡式學(xué)習(xí)+原來就很好的基礎(chǔ)，那么考試肯定沒有問題。但是我不知道每個(gè)人的基礎(chǔ)到底怎么樣，是不是每天堅(jiān)持學(xué)習(xí)，所以不能下定論。

問：有沒有口譯的培訓(xùn)班?

答：新東方應(yīng)該有開設(shè)培訓(xùn)班，但是我是自學(xué)的口譯，沒有上過新東方的班。不過我在之前暑假有去北京的一個(gè)培訓(xùn)機(jī)構(gòu)培訓(xùn)過一個(gè)月時(shí)間，個(gè)人認(rèn)為還是不錯(cuò)的。杭州的培訓(xùn)班比較少而且和我學(xué)校很遠(yuǎn)，所以平時(shí)沒有報(bào)，大家如果有條件的話報(bào)一個(gè)也是不錯(cuò)的，最好報(bào)名之前看一下師資。

高級(jí)口譯閱讀第一篇原文

Great to see the article I’d written on the role of charities in health published this morning. It reads well (he says modestly!). Here it is in case you missed it;

Charities can offer better service than the NHS

Stop arguing over private or public delivery on health and choose what is best for patients

St John’s Hospital in Bath was established in 1180 to provide healing and homes by the bubbling spa springs for the poor and infirm. The charity is still there 830 years later: a much valued health and care service for the elderly.

This demonstrates our country’s great charitable tradition in health. The Government’s desire to put citizens and patients first is both core to the current health reforms and a guiding mission for the country’s great charities and social enterprises. The words of the Health Secretary, Andrew Lansley, “no decision about me, without me”, are our driving passion.

We have a dual role: to deliver health services, undertake research and provide care and compassion to those most in need; and to act as an advocate and adviser. We are sometimes a challenger of the health establishment and always a doughty champion for patients.

For these reforms to be a success we must ensure a much stronger role for the third sector. That is why we strongly support the policy of “any willing provider”. The previous Government was profoundly mistaken in pursuing a policy of the NHS as “preferred provider”, which implied that services from our sector were less valued than the State’s. In fact, through a big expansion of the role of charities and social enterprises in providing care, we can provide more cost-effective and citizen-focused services.

This is not about privatisation. What matters is what is delivered, not who delivers it. This must be at the heart of health service reform.

Charities can offer a better deal in so many ways. In 2008 the NHS spent just over 0.05 per cent of its healthcare budget through charities. In other words this is a virtually untapped resource waiting to be used.

To me, competition in the NHS means British Red Cross volunteers being able to help more people to adapt to life at home after a lengthy spell in hospital, so preventing the need for readmission. Those who get this support are often aged over 65 and have experienced a fall. Volunteers bring them home, settle them in, advise neighbours or relatives of their return, check on pets, help to prepare a meal and make a further visit to ensure that they are safe and well. Such schemes can save the typical NHS commissioner up to ￡1 million a year.

Competition in the NHS would also mean an environmental charity such as BTCV running more “green gyms”, which give people a physical workout while taking part in environmental projects. So far, more than 10,000 people ― often referred by GPs ― have taken part. An evaluation found that the positive impact on mental and physical health, not to mention the acquisition of new skills, means that the State saves ￡153 for every ￡100 it invests. On top of that, it has a positive impact on local communities and the environment. Do we want less of this or more? I suspect that for most of us the answer is obvious.

Those who rely most on the NHS are the vulnerable, the very people charities were set up to help, precisely because they were being let down by the status quo. If groups such as the Red Cross and BTCV can do a better job than the NHS, we should let them.

Promoting wellbeing and preventing ill health have for too long been neglected aspects of the NHS’s role. These reforms rightly put emphasis on public health. Giving a role in health back to local councils is long overdue. The new health and wellbeing boards may provide the opportunity to get more resources behind public health as well as, for the first time, giving elected councillors the chance to scrutinise NHS resources. Preventing diabetes through better education, diet and exercise is always a better approach than picking up the costs of a growing number of people with diabetes. Charities such as Diabetes UK, working with councils and GPs, are critical to achieving that.

Of course there are challenges in introducing reforms. Of course proper funding is crucial. We want to ensure that there is a strategic approach to commissioning, including national guidelines. We want the new GP consortia to take full advantage of the opportunity to expand their work with our sector.

The challenge we face as a country is to build on the sure foundations of our NHS to provide service that recognises and expands the work of charities, promotes partnerships between State, third and private sectors and moves on from arcane arguments over privatisation.

And The Times also had a brilliant summary of the problems of Big Society and how to solve them by Phil Collins and a great letter from my Chair in response to the Francis Maude MP article.

I’m blogging from H M Treasury where the Prime Minister has been announcing new procurement and commissioning arrangements to free up the process for SMEs and charities and social enterprises. He was clear that we are part of the SME community and contracting has to be changed so that we can bid easier and better. He must have mentioned charities some 10 times in his speech and even referred to me directly. Then shook my hand on the way out! I made the point to him that we welcome the initiatives and I referred to Chris White MP’s Social Clause Bill and how important that is.

And now the weekend beckons. Though I’m spending Sunday morning on Sky News. There you go; no rest for the wicked!

高級(jí)口譯閱讀第三篇原文

John Lewis: never knowingly undersold?

It is possibly the most famous promise in British retailing: "Never knowingly undersold" has been at the heart of John Lewis’s business since 1925. But a quietly introduced change has infuriated loyal customers, who claim the price-match promise is now slipping away.

For many years John Lewis customers have been safe in the knowledge that if they found their purchase for a lower price elsewhere the company would refund the difference. Carrier bags and marketing campaigns have proudly proclaimed to the world that John Lewis won’t be beaten on price.

Yet since September some customers who have asked John Lewis to match the price of goods found cheaper elsewhere on the high street have been turned away.

A Guardian Money reader from Roydon, Essex, contacted us after he bought a Hotpoint washing machine in John Lewis’s Welwyn store for ￡279. A few days later he saw the same model in Argos for ￡219 ? ￡60 cheaper. John Lewis turned down his claim made under the never knowingly undersold policy, because it said it guaranteed the washing machines for two years, while Argos offered only one year.

The customer complained ? unsuccessfully ? that the store wasn’t being fair as this was not made clear in the literature.

When Money investigated, we found that John Lewis had made a fundamental change to its policy.

In a statement in September, which at the time drew positive headlines, it said it would for the first time match online prices from other retailers as long as they also had a physical high street presence. What was made less clear was that the store would no longer match a price unless its rival offers the exact same warranty.

The policy change might not sound much, but it in effect allows the store to avoid almost all price matching of electrical items ? because John Lewis has adopted a policy of offering two-year warranties on almost every such item. Most stores in the UK offer just one year.

When we first raised the reader’s complaint with John Lewis it told us: "As part of our commitment to be never knowingly undersold, we match prices based on the combined cost of the product plus charges the competitor may make for a comparable warranty or guarantee. We evaluate price-match claims on a like-for-like basis, and breakdown cover is a crucial part of our proposition to our customers."

What it failed to mention was that prior to the September policy rewrite, it would have paid the complainant the ￡60 difference between the John Lewis and Argos washing machines.

Interestingly, the store confirmed it would not price match the cost of buying a product plus a warranty from a third party company, but would consider a claim if the cheaper retailer offered the chance to buy both together.

David Suddock, head of buying support at John Lewis, who revised the policy, says: "As a result of our commitment to expand our never knowingly undersold policy to include other retailers with online presences we now put a great deal of resources into checking the prices charged by our rivals and lowering ours where appropriate. Our customers are benefiting through significantly reduced prices. They tell us they value the extra warranty periods we offer, and we think it is only fair we should include that in our price match scheme. The terms of the never knowingly undersold policy are clearly presented in both our stores and on the website."

But if the Money postbag is to be believed, most John Lewis customers were unaware of the change. And Martyn Hocking, editor of Which? says: "John Lewis is known for its great customer service, so the change to its never knowingly undersold policy is very disappointing. Customers would naturally expect any price matching policy to relate to the up-front cost of a product, excluding the value of added extras such as warranties and guarantees. As such, we feel that the amended policy is misleading and will lead to frustration for many shoppers."

But Natalie Berg, research director at retail analysts Planet Retail, says John Lewis’s move was perhaps inevitable: "The internet has put the power to compare prices in the hands of all of us; some shoppers now use smart phones to check prices as they walk around a store. John Lewis has realised that while price is important, it’s not the factor in where to buy. The fact that John Lewis has been one of the winners on the high street in recent months suggests consumers are not just looking for the lowest prices, but they want value ? and the perception is that John Lewis delivers this."

高級(jí)口譯考試口試攻略相關(guān)文章：

★ 英語翻譯