雅思考試真的存在壓分嗎
談論到雅思壓分，雅思口語寫作壓分大約是雅思江湖里盛傳的傳說Number1。今天小編給大家?guī)硌潘伎荚囌娴拇嬖趬悍謫?，希望能夠幫助到大家，下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。
雅思考試真的存在壓分嗎?
關于雅思考試壓分的官方版解釋：
全球的雅思考的甄選培訓都是遵循統(tǒng)一的標準，他們的評分尺度也是按照相同的標準。
而每一場考試，每一個同學的答分，無論是寫作，還是口語，都是由至少兩名以上的考官進行不同的審閱，比如說寫作的話，會有兩個考官在這里進行打分。
口語也是一樣，會有考官，當天的主考官給你進行打分，你的錄音錄完以后，也會有另外一位考官進行聽音，進行判分。所以不存在壓分情況。
雅思考試地點的影響
1. 那么考試所在國家對給分有影響嗎?
答：這里沒有找到特別官方的統(tǒng)計(也很難有)，但是根據大家普遍反映的實際情況是英國，港澳臺，日本等給分都普遍高于大陸。這里的分數差異就是在主觀分：口語和寫作了。特別英國口語都會給得比較高，一般來說國內6分在英國可以拿到7分左右，但寫作不一定，分差有一分左右。
2. 在大陸考，考場所在的城市對給分有影響嗎?
答：很多同學都覺得一些二三線城市的給分會比較高，因為當地考生的英語水平可能相對比較差。
我當時也這么想的，特地去了安徽合肥考的。但是后來發(fā)現(xiàn)大家都是這么想的，當時同個考場的幾個同學互相一問，全是從江浙滬來的。所以其實區(qū)別不大。
3. 傳說中4分南海神尼，5分笑面虎老頭等考官真的存在嗎?
答：傳說只是傳說 。咱付這么多錢去考，這個服務還是不能太坑的。成績只會上下波動1分之內，畢竟存在考官，題目和學生的個體差異性。
我們的建議
無論是在哪里考試，無論是在國內還是國外，最重要的是提高自己的基本功底，扎扎實實自己的詞匯量，豐富我的詞匯表達，鍛煉我的流利度，避免很多語法、發(fā)音錯誤，只有把自己的基本功給它練就扎實了，你才能夠所向披靡，無論在哪一個考場。
另外，如果覺得雅思成績被壓分了，可以考慮考后復議：
當覺得自己成績和想象出入比較大，或者整體分數較高某一門就差0.5不妨試試申訴。
每次考試只能申訴一下，需要1200左右RMB。 申訴成功能全額退款，申訴失敗能不退。所以建議對自己的發(fā)揮有信心而且就差一點點的同學申訴一下。
雅思成績復議常見疑問
1.要不要寫一封洋洋灑灑讓人看了淚流滿面的申訴信?
答：不需要，寫了也不會被重新審核的考官看到。你的錄音和作文是被送到英國雅思中心由資深專家重新審核的。
2. 申訴會降分嗎?
答：不會，申訴結果要么是原分不動，錢沒了，要么是分提高，錢退回。
3. 申訴要花多久?
答：一般是在官網提交申訴請求后一個月內通知結果。
4.申訴能提高多少分?
答：一般單科0.5或者1分。 提高之前改的考官比較離譜。
雅思閱讀全真練習系列：Next Year Marks the EU's 50th Anniversary of the Treaty
Next Year Marks the EU's 50th Anniversary of the Treaty
A. After a period of introversion and stunned self-disbelief, continental European governments will recover their enthusiasm for pan-European institution-building in 2007. Whether the European public will welcome a return to what voters in two countries had rejected so short a time before is another matter.
B. There are several reasons for Europe’s recovering self-confidence. For years European economies had been lagging dismally behind America (to say nothing of Asia), but in 2006 the large continental economies had one of their best years for a decade, briefly outstripping America in terms of growth. Since politics often reacts to economic change with a lag, 2006’s improvement in economic growth will have its impact in 2007, though the recovery may be ebbing by then.
C. The coming year also marks a particular point in a political cycle so regular that it almost seems to amount to a natural law. Every four or five years, European countries take a large stride towards further integration by signing a new treaty: the Maastricht treaty in 1992, the Treaty of Amsterdam in 1997, the Treaty of Nice in 2001. And in 2005 they were supposed to ratify a European constitution, laying the ground for yet more integration—until the calm rhythm was rudely shattered by French and Dutch voters. But the political impetus to sign something every four or five years has only been interrupted, not immobilised, by this setback.
D. In 2007 the European Union marks the 50th anniversary of another treaty—the Treaty of Rome, its founding charter. Government leaders have already agreed to celebrate it ceremoniously, restating their commitment to “ever closer union” and the basic ideals of European unity. By itself, and in normal circumstances, the EU’s 50th-birthday greeting to itself would be fairly meaningless, a routine expression of European good fellowship. But it does not take a Machiavelli to spot that once governments have signed the declaration (and it seems unlikely anyone would be so uncollegiate as to veto it) they will already be halfway towards committing themselves to a new treaty. All that will be necessary will be to incorporate the 50th-anniversary declaration into a new treaty containing a number of institutional and other reforms extracted from the failed attempt at constitution-building and—hey presto—a new quasi-constitution will be ready.
E. According to the German government—which holds the EU’s agenda-setting presidency during the first half of 2007—there will be a new draft of a slimmed-down constitution ready by the middle of the year, perhaps to put to voters, perhaps not. There would then be a couple of years in which it will be discussed, approved by parliaments and, perhaps, put to voters if that is deemed unavoidable. Then, according to bureaucratic planners in Brussels and Berlin, blithely ignoring the possibility of public rejection, the whole thing will be signed, sealed and a new constitution delivered in 2009-10. Europe will be nicely back on schedule. Its four-to-five-year cycle of integration will have missed only one beat.
F. The resurrection of the European constitution will be made more likely in 2007 because of what is happening in national capitals. The European Union is not really an autonomous organisation. If it functions, it is because the leaders of the big continental countries want it to, reckoning that an active European policy will help them get done what they want to do in their own countries.
G. That did not happen in 2005-06. Defensive, cynical and self-destructive, the leaders of the three largest euro-zone countries—France, Italy and Germany—were stumbling towards their unlamented ends. They saw no reason to pursue any sort of European policy and the EU, as a result, barely functioned. But by the middle of 2007 all three will have gone, and this fact alone will transform the European political landscape.
H. The upshot is that the politics of the three large continental countries, bureaucratic momentum and the economics of recovery will all be aligned to give a push towards integration in 2007. That does not mean the momentum will be irresistible or even popular. The British government, for one, will almost certainly not want to go with the flow, beginning yet another chapter in the long history of confrontation between Britain and the rest of Europe. More important, the voters will want a say. They rejected the constitution in 2005. It would be foolish to assume they will accept it after 2007 just as a result of an artful bit of tinkering.
Questions 1-6 Do the following statemets reflect the claims of the writer in Reading Passage 1?
Write your answer in Boxes 1-6 on your answer sheet.
TRUE if the statemenht reflets the claims of the writer
FALSE if the statement contradicts the claims of the writer
NOT GIVEN if it is possbile to say what the writer thinks about this
1.After years’ introspection and mistrust, continental European governments will resurrect their enthusiasm for more integration in 2007.
2. The European consitution was officially approved in 2005 in spite of the oppositon of French and Dutch voters.
3. The Treaty of Rome , which is considered as the fundamental charter of the European Union, was signed in 1957.
4.It is very unlikely that European countries will sign the declaration at the 50th anniversary of the Treaty of Rome.
5.French government will hold the EU’s presidency and lay down the agenda during the first half of 2008.
6.For a long time in hisotry, there has been confrontation between Britain and the rest of European countries.
Questions 7-10 Complet the following sentencces.
Choose NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS from Reading Passage 1 for each answer.
Write your answer in Boxes 7-10 on your answer sheet.
7. Every four or five years, European countries tend to make a rapid progress towards ___________________by signing a new treaty.
8. The European constitution is supposed to ______________________for yet more integration of European Union member countries.
9. The bureaucratic planners in Brussels and Berlin rashly ignore the possibility of __________________and think the new consitution will be delivered in 2009-10.
10. The politics of the three large continental countries, __________________ and the economic recovery will join together to urge the integration in 2007.
Questions 11-14 Choose the appropriate letters A-D and write them in boxes 11-14 on your answer sheet.
11. Which of the following statemnts is true of Euopean economic development.
A. The economy of Europe developed much faster than that of Asia before 2006.
B. The growth of European economy was slightly slower than that of America in 2006.
C. The development of European economy are likely to slow down by 2007.
D. The recovery of European economy may be considerably accelerated by 2007.
12. The word “immobilised” in the last line of Section C means ___________.
A. stopped completely.
B. pushed strongly.
C. motivated wholely.
D. impeded totally.
13. Which of the following statements about the treaties in European countries is NOT TRUE.
A. The Maastricht Treaty was signed in 1992.
B. The Treaty of Amsterdan was signed in 1997.
C. The Treaty of Nice was signed in 2001.
D. The Treaty of Rome was signed in 2007.
14. The European constitution failed to be ratified in 2005--2006, because
A. The leaders of France, Italy and Germany were defensive, cynical and self-destructuve..
B. The voters in two countries of the Union --France and Holland rejected the constitution.
C. The leaders of the EU thought that it was unneccessary to pursue any European policy.
D. France, Italy and Germany are the three largest and most influential euro-zone countries.
Notes to the Reading Passage
1. pan-Enropean
pan-: 前綴：全，總，泛
pan-African 全/泛非洲的(運動)
pan-Enropean全/泛歐的(機構建設)
2. outstrip
超越，勝過，超過，優(yōu)于
Material development outstripped human development”“物質的發(fā)展超過了人類的進步”
3. ebb
回落跌落;衰退或消減
The tide is on the ebb.正在退潮。
4. Machiavelli
馬基雅維利，尼克爾1469-1527意大利政治理論家，他的著作君主論(1513年)闡述了一個意志堅定的統(tǒng)治者不顧道德觀念的約束如何獲得并保持其權力。
文章中意為“任何一個人都可以看到，顯而易見。。?！薄?/p>
5. hey presto
突然地;立即(魔術師用語)您看，變!
6. upshot
結果;結局
雅思考試真的存在壓分嗎相關文章：